qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de>
To: "Jose R. Ziviani" <jziviani@suse.de>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org,
	kraxel@redhat.com, "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] modules: Improve error message when module is not found
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 11:41:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c26fc6f4-341f-c66f-5384-c811e1342891@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210722220952.17444-2-jziviani@suse.de>

On 7/23/21 12:09 AM, Jose R. Ziviani wrote:
> When a module is not found, specially accelerators, QEMU displays
> a error message that not easy to understand[1]. This patch improves
> the readability by offering a user-friendly message[2].
> 
> This patch also moves the accelerator ops check to runtine (instead
> of the original g_assert) because it works better with dynamic
> modules.
> 
> [1] qemu-system-x86_64 -accel tcg
> ERROR:../accel/accel-softmmu.c:82:accel_init_ops_interfaces: assertion failed:
> (ops != NULL)
> Bail out! ERROR:../accel/accel-softmmu.c:82:accel_init_ops_interfaces:
> assertion failed: (ops != NULL)
>     31964 IOT instruction (core dumped)  ./qemu-system-x86_64 ...
> 
> [2] qemu-system-x86_64 -accel tcg
> accel-tcg-x86_64 module is missing, install the package or config the library path correctly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jose R. Ziviani <jziviani@suse.de>
> ---
>  accel/accel-softmmu.c |  5 ++++-
>  util/module.c         | 14 ++++++++------
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/accel/accel-softmmu.c b/accel/accel-softmmu.c
> index 67276e4f52..52449ac2d0 100644
> --- a/accel/accel-softmmu.c
> +++ b/accel/accel-softmmu.c
> @@ -79,7 +79,10 @@ void accel_init_ops_interfaces(AccelClass *ac)
>       * all accelerators need to define ops, providing at least a mandatory
>       * non-NULL create_vcpu_thread operation.
>       */
> -    g_assert(ops != NULL);
> +    if (ops == NULL) {
> +        exit(1);
> +    }
> +


Ah, again, why?
This change looks wrong to me, 

the ops code should be present when ops interfaces are initialized:
it should be a code level assertion, as it has to do with the proper order of initializations in QEMU,

why would we want to do anything else but to assert here?

Am I blind to something obvious?

>      if (ops->ops_init) {
>          ops->ops_init(ops);
>      }
> diff --git a/util/module.c b/util/module.c
> index 6bb4ad915a..268a8563fd 100644
> --- a/util/module.c
> +++ b/util/module.c
> @@ -206,13 +206,10 @@ static int module_load_file(const char *fname, bool mayfail, bool export_symbols
>  out:
>      return ret;
>  }
> -#endif
>  
>  bool module_load_one(const char *prefix, const char *lib_name, bool mayfail)
>  {
>      bool success = false;
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
>      char *fname = NULL;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MODULE_UPGRADES
>      char *version_dir;
> @@ -300,6 +297,9 @@ bool module_load_one(const char *prefix, const char *lib_name, bool mayfail)
>  
>      if (!success) {
>          g_hash_table_remove(loaded_modules, module_name);
> +        fprintf(stderr, "%s module is missing, install the "
> +                        "package or config the library path "
> +                        "correctly.\n", module_name);
>          g_free(module_name);
>      }
>  
> @@ -307,12 +307,9 @@ bool module_load_one(const char *prefix, const char *lib_name, bool mayfail)
>          g_free(dirs[i]);
>      }
>  
> -#endif
>      return success;
>  }
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
> -
>  static bool module_loaded_qom_all;
>  
>  void module_load_qom_one(const char *type)
> @@ -384,4 +381,9 @@ void qemu_load_module_for_opts(const char *group) {}
>  void module_load_qom_one(const char *type) {}
>  void module_load_qom_all(void) {}
>  
> +bool module_load_one(const char *prefix, const char *lib_name, bool mayfail)
> +{
> +    return false;
> +}
> +
>  #endif
> 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-23  9:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-22 22:09 [PATCH v2 0/1] Improve module accelerator error message Jose R. Ziviani
2021-07-22 22:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] modules: Improve error message when module is not found Jose R. Ziviani
2021-07-23  6:25   ` Gerd Hoffmann
2021-07-23  8:04     ` Claudio Fontana
2021-07-23  8:28   ` Markus Armbruster
2021-07-23  8:32     ` Claudio Fontana
2021-07-23  9:41   ` Claudio Fontana [this message]
2021-07-23  9:52     ` Gerd Hoffmann
2021-07-23 11:20       ` Claudio Fontana
2021-07-23 12:20         ` Claudio Fontana
2021-07-23 12:48           ` Gerd Hoffmann
2021-07-29  9:14             ` modular tcg (was: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] modules: Improve error message when module is not) found Gerd Hoffmann
2021-07-29  9:40               ` modular tcg Claudio Fontana
2021-07-29 10:26                 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2021-07-29 10:42                   ` Claudio Fontana
2021-07-29  9:42               ` Claudio Fontana
2021-07-29 10:29                 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2021-07-29 10:44                   ` Claudio Fontana
2021-07-29 11:34                     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-07-29 11:39                       ` Claudio Fontana
2021-07-29 14:22                       ` Claudio Fontana
2021-07-29 14:59                         ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-07-29 16:35                           ` Claudio Fontana
2021-07-29 16:40               ` modular tcg (was: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] modules: Improve error message when module is not) found Paolo Bonzini
2021-07-30  9:05                 ` modular tcg Gerd Hoffmann
2021-07-30 10:02                   ` Claudio Fontana
2022-09-02  9:50               ` modular tcg (was: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] modules: Improve error message when module is not) found Claudio Fontana
2021-07-23 13:50     ` [PATCH v2 1/1] modules: Improve error message when module is not found Jose R. Ziviani
2021-07-23 14:02       ` Claudio Fontana
2021-07-23 14:14         ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-07-23 14:36         ` Jose R. Ziviani
2021-07-23 15:27           ` Claudio Fontana
2021-07-23 15:46             ` Jose R. Ziviani

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c26fc6f4-341f-c66f-5384-c811e1342891@suse.de \
    --to=cfontana@suse.de \
    --cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
    --cc=jziviani@suse.de \
    --cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).