From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Hailiang Zhang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>,
zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: xuquan8@huawei.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] colo-compare: reconstruct the mutex lock usage
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 11:16:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c2a355a3-74ed-4503-9a8d-c606af2c7d6e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58A2B2D5.4060902@huawei.com>
On 2017年02月14日 15:33, Hailiang Zhang wrote:
> On 2017/2/14 12:08, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2017年02月14日 10:32, Hailiang Zhang wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Jason,
>>>
>>>> I think the better way is notify the comparing thread and let it do
>>>> the
>>>> releasing. You probably need similar mechanism to notify from
>>>> comparing
>>>> thread to checkpoint thread.
>>>>
>>>
>>> It seems that there is no available APIs in glib to notify a thread
>>> which
>>> are run coroutine to do something (idle source ?). What about using
>>> anonymous pipe
>>> as the GPollFD to communicate between colo comparing thread and colo
>>> thread ?
>>>
>>> Any ideas ?
>>>
>>> Hailiang
>>
>> Haven't thought this deeply. But I think you can try event notifier
>> first which was designed for such kind of notification.
>>
>
> Hmm, It is quite same with what i said above except it uses the
> return value of eventfd as the GPollFD.
> The things here are more complex especially if there are more than
> one vNIC, which each is corresponding to one compare thread.
>
> How about using g_source_attach(), g_source_attach(), g_source_remove(),
> g_source_set_callback() and g_source_set_priority() to control the
> process
> of releasing packets dynamically ? Which we call g_source_attach()
> to add the coroutine of releasing packets when do checkpoint, and remove
> it once finishing the checkpoint process.
I'm not sure I get the idea, maybe you can post patch for early review.
>
> About colo comparing thread notifies colo thread, i think we can use
> qemu_cond_wait(),qemu_cond_broadcast(), just like what we do in
> pause_all_vcpus().
Yes, agree.
Thanks
>
> Thanks.
> Hailiang
>
>> Thanks
>>
>> .
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-15 3:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-24 14:05 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] colo-compare: Preparing work for combining with COLO frame zhanghailiang
2017-01-24 14:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] colo-compare: reconstruct the mutex lock usage zhanghailiang
2017-02-03 3:47 ` Jason Wang
2017-02-06 8:13 ` Hailiang Zhang
2017-02-06 8:30 ` Zhang Chen
2017-02-06 9:35 ` Jason Wang
2017-02-06 11:11 ` Hailiang Zhang
2017-02-06 12:53 ` Jason Wang
2017-02-07 7:54 ` Hailiang Zhang
2017-02-07 7:57 ` Jason Wang
2017-02-07 8:19 ` Hailiang Zhang
2017-02-07 9:21 ` Jason Wang
2017-02-07 9:30 ` Hailiang Zhang
2017-02-14 2:32 ` Hailiang Zhang
2017-02-14 4:08 ` Jason Wang
2017-02-14 7:33 ` Hailiang Zhang
2017-02-15 3:16 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2017-01-24 14:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] colo-compare: add API to flush all queued packets while do checkpoint zhanghailiang
2017-01-24 14:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] colo-compare: use notifier to notify inconsistent packets comparing zhanghailiang
2017-02-03 4:50 ` Jason Wang
2017-02-06 8:44 ` Hailiang Zhang
2017-02-06 9:35 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c2a355a3-74ed-4503-9a8d-c606af2c7d6e@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=xuquan8@huawei.com \
--cc=zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com \
--cc=zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).