From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
To: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
pasic@linux.ibm.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org,
david@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
mst@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
ehabkost@redhat.com, marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com,
eblake@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, seiden@linux.ibm.com,
nrb@linux.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, berrange@redhat.com,
clg@kaod.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 02/11] s390x/cpu topology: add topology entries on CPU hotplug
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 10:21:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c2c502ca-2a1f-d29f-8931-4be7389557ee@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6345131acfb04e353ca2eba620bf27609bfeb535.camel@linux.ibm.com>
On 2/2/23 17:42, Nina Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-02-01 at 14:20 +0100, Pierre Morel wrote:
>> The topology information are attributes of the CPU and are
>> specified during the CPU device creation.
>>
>> On hot plug we:
>> - calculate the default values for the topology for drawers,
>> books and sockets in the case they are not specified.
>> - verify the CPU attributes
>> - check that we have still room on the desired socket
>>
>> The possibility to insert a CPU in a mask is dependent on the
>> number of cores allowed in a socket, a book or a drawer, the
>> checking is done during the hot plug of the CPU to have an
>> immediate answer.
>>
>> If the complete topology is not specified, the core is added
>> in the physical topology based on its core ID and it gets
>> defaults values for the modifier attributes.
>>
>> This way, starting QEMU without specifying the topology can
>> still get some advantage of the CPU topology.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h | 24 +++
>> hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c | 256 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 23 ++-
>> hw/s390x/meson.build | 1 +
>> 4 files changed, 302 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
>>
> [...]
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c b/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000..12df4eca6c
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,256 @@
>> +/*
>> + * CPU Topology
>> + *
>> + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2022
>> + * Author(s): Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>> +
>> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or (at
>> + * your option) any later version. See the COPYING file in the top-level
>> + * directory.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include "qemu/osdep.h"
>> +#include "qapi/error.h"
>> +#include "qemu/error-report.h"
>> +#include "hw/qdev-properties.h"
>> +#include "hw/boards.h"
>> +#include "qemu/typedefs.h"
>> +#include "target/s390x/cpu.h"
>> +#include "hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h"
>> +#include "hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h"
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * s390_topology is used to keep the topology information.
>> + * .list: queue the topology entries inside which
>> + * we keep the information on the CPU topology.
>
> .list doesn't exist yet.
right, I move it to the corresponding patch.
>
>> + * .socket: tracks information on the count of cores per socket.
>> + * .smp: keeps track of the machine topology.
>> + *
>> + */
>> +S390Topology s390_topology = {
>> + /* will be initialized after the cpu model is realized */
>> + .cores_per_socket = NULL,
>> + .smp = NULL,
>> +};
>>
> [...]
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * s390_topology_cpu_default:
>> + * @cpu: pointer to a S390CPU
>> + * @errp: Error pointer
>> + *
>> + * Setup the default topology for unset attributes.
>
> My suggestion:
> Setup the default topology if no attributes are already set.
> Passing a CPU with some, but not all, attributes set is considered an error.
Thanks, I take your suggestion.
>
>> + *
>> + * The function accept only all all default values or all set values
>> + * for the geometry topology.
>
> acceptS, all all
> If you take my suggestion, you can just drop this sentence.
>
>> + *
>> + * The function calculates the (drawer_id, book_id, socket_id)
>> + * topology by filling the cores starting from the first socket
>> + * (0, 0, 0) up to the last (smp->drawers, smp->books, smp->sockets).
>> + *
>> + * CPU type, polarity and dedication have defaults values set in the
>> + * s390x_cpu_properties.
>> + */
>> +static void s390_topology_cpu_default(S390CPU *cpu, Error **errp)
>> +{
>> + CpuTopology *smp = s390_topology.smp;
>> + CPUS390XState *env = &cpu->env;
>> +
>> + /* All geometry topology attributes must be set or all unset */
>> + if ((env->socket_id < 0 || env->book_id < 0 || env->drawer_id < 0) &&
>> + (env->socket_id >= 0 || env->book_id >= 0 || env->drawer_id >= 0)) {
>> + error_setg(errp,
>> + "Please define all or none of the topology geometry attributes");
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Check if one of the geometry topology is unset */
>> + if (env->socket_id < 0) {
>> + /* Calculate default geometry topology attributes */
>> + env->socket_id = (env->core_id / smp->cores) % smp->sockets;
>> + env->book_id = (env->core_id / (smp->sockets * smp->cores)) %
>> + smp->books;
>> + env->drawer_id = (env->core_id /
>> + (smp->books * smp->sockets * smp->cores)) %
>> + smp->drawers;
>> + }
>> +}
>>
> [...]
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * s390_set_core_in_socket:
>> + * @cpu: the new S390CPU to insert in the topology structure
>> + * @drawer_id: new drawer_id
>> + * @book_id: new book_id
>> + * @socket_id: new socket_id
>> + * @creation: if is true the CPU is a new CPU and there is no old socket
>> + * to handle.
>> + * if is false, this is a moving the CPU and old socket count
>> + * must be decremented.
>> + * @errp: the error pointer
>> + *
>> + */
>> +static void s390_set_core_in_socket(S390CPU *cpu, int drawer_id, int book_id,
>
> Maybe name it s390_(topology_)?add_core_to_socket instead.
OK, it is better
>
>> + int socket_id, bool creation, Error **errp)
>> +{
>> + int old_socket = s390_socket_nb(cpu);
>> + int new_socket;
>> +
>> + if (creation) {
>> + new_socket = old_socket;
>> + } else {
>
> You need parentheses here.
>
>> + new_socket = drawer_id * s390_topology.smp->books +
> (
>> + book_id * s390_topology.smp->sockets +
> )
>> + socket_id;
If you prefer I can us parentheses.
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Check for space on new socket */
>> + if ((new_socket != old_socket) &&
>> + (s390_topology.cores_per_socket[new_socket] >=
>> + s390_topology.smp->cores)) {
>> + error_setg(errp, "No more space on this socket");
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Update the count of cores in sockets */
>> + s390_topology.cores_per_socket[new_socket] += 1;
>> + if (!creation) {
>> + s390_topology.cores_per_socket[old_socket] -= 1;
>> + }
>> +}
>>
> [...]
>
>> +/**
>> + * s390_topology_set_cpu:
>> + * @ms: MachineState used to initialize the topology structure on
>> + * first call.
>> + * @cpu: the new S390CPU to insert in the topology structure
>> + * @errp: the error pointer
>> + *
>> + * Called from CPU Hotplug to check and setup the CPU attributes
>> + * before to insert the CPU in the topology.
>> + */
>> +void s390_topology_set_cpu(MachineState *ms, S390CPU *cpu, Error **errp)
>
> The name is rather non informative.
> s390_topology_setup_cpu ?
OK
>
>> +{
>> + ERRP_GUARD();
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * We do not want to initialize the topology if the cpu model
>> + * does not support topology consequently, we have to wait for
> ^
> Still think there should be a comma here.
OK
>
>> + * the first CPU to be realized, which realizes the CPU model
>> + * to initialize the topology structures.
>> + *
>> + * s390_topology_set_cpu() is called from the cpu hotplug.
>> + */
>> + if (!s390_topology.cores_per_socket) {
>> + s390_topology_init(ms);
>> + }
>> +
>> + s390_topology_check(cpu, errp);
>> + if (*errp) {
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Set the CPU inside the socket */
>> + s390_set_core_in_socket(cpu, 0, 0, 0, true, errp);
>> + if (*errp) {
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* topology tree is reflected in props */
>> + s390_update_cpu_props(ms, cpu);
>> +}
>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
>> index f3cc845d3b..9bc51a83f4 100644
>> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
>> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
>> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
>> #include "hw/s390x/pv.h"
>> #include "migration/blocker.h"
>> #include "qapi/visitor.h"
>> +#include "hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h"
>>
>> static Error *pv_mig_blocker;
>>
>> @@ -310,10 +311,18 @@ static void s390_cpu_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
>> {
>> MachineState *ms = MACHINE(hotplug_dev);
>> S390CPU *cpu = S390_CPU(dev);
>> + ERRP_GUARD();
>>
>> g_assert(!ms->possible_cpus->cpus[cpu->env.core_id].cpu);
>> ms->possible_cpus->cpus[cpu->env.core_id].cpu = OBJECT(dev);
>>
>> + if (s390_has_topology()) {
>> + s390_topology_set_cpu(ms, cpu, errp);
>> + if (*errp) {
>> + return;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> if (dev->hotplugged) {
>> raise_irq_cpu_hotplug();
>> }
>> @@ -551,11 +560,21 @@ static const CPUArchIdList *s390_possible_cpu_arch_ids(MachineState *ms)
>> sizeof(CPUArchId) * max_cpus);
>> ms->possible_cpus->len = max_cpus;
>> for (i = 0; i < ms->possible_cpus->len; i++) {
>> + CpuInstanceProperties *props = &ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].props;
>> +
>> ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].type = ms->cpu_type;
>> ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].vcpus_count = 1;
>> ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].arch_id = i;
>> - ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].props.has_core_id = true;
>> - ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].props.core_id = i;
>> +
>> + props->has_core_id = true;
>> + props->core_id = i;
>> + props->has_socket_id = true;
>> + props->socket_id = i / ms->smp.cores;
>> + props->has_book_id = true;
>> + props->book_id = i / (ms->smp.cores * ms->smp.sockets);
>> + props->has_drawer_id = true;
>> + props->drawer_id = i /
>> + (ms->smp.cores * ms->smp.sockets * ms->smp.books);
>
> You need to calculate the modulus like in s390_topology_cpu_default, right?
!!! yes of course, good catch, I forgot that.
Since there are two uses of this calculation, what about using inlines?
like:
static inline int s390_std_socket(int n, CpuTopology *smp)
{
return (n / smp->cores) % smp->sockets;
}
static inline int s390_std_book(int n, CpuTopology *smp)
{
return (n / (smp->cores * smp->sockets)) % smp->books;
}
static inline int s390_std_drawer(int n, CpuTopology *smp)
{
return (n / (smp->cores * smp->sockets * smp->books)) % smp->books;
}
Thanks for the comments.
Regards,
Pierre
--
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-03 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-01 13:20 [PATCH v15 00/11] s390x: CPU Topology Pierre Morel
2023-02-01 13:20 ` [PATCH v15 01/11] s390x/cpu topology: adding s390 specificities to CPU topology Pierre Morel
2023-02-02 10:44 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-02 13:15 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-02 16:05 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-03 9:39 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-03 11:21 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-08 17:50 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-10 14:19 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-01 13:20 ` [PATCH v15 02/11] s390x/cpu topology: add topology entries on CPU hotplug Pierre Morel
2023-02-02 16:42 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-03 9:21 ` Pierre Morel [this message]
2023-02-03 13:22 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-03 14:40 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-03 15:38 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-01 13:20 ` [PATCH v15 03/11] target/s390x/cpu topology: handle STSI(15) and build the SYSIB Pierre Morel
2023-02-03 17:36 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-06 10:06 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-06 10:32 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-06 11:24 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-06 12:57 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-09 16:39 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-10 14:16 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-01 13:20 ` [PATCH v15 04/11] s390x/sclp: reporting the maximum nested topology entries Pierre Morel
2023-02-06 10:13 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-06 10:19 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-01 13:20 ` [PATCH v15 05/11] s390x/cpu topology: resetting the Topology-Change-Report Pierre Morel
2023-02-06 11:05 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-06 12:50 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-06 17:52 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-07 9:24 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-07 10:50 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-07 12:19 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-07 13:37 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-07 14:08 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-01 13:20 ` [PATCH v15 06/11] s390x/cpu topology: interception of PTF instruction Pierre Morel
2023-02-06 11:38 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-06 13:02 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-06 18:34 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-07 9:59 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-07 11:27 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-07 13:03 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-01 13:20 ` [PATCH v15 07/11] target/s390x/cpu topology: activating CPU topology Pierre Morel
2023-02-06 11:57 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-06 13:19 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-01 13:20 ` [PATCH v15 08/11] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: x-set-cpu-topology monitor command Pierre Morel
2023-02-06 12:21 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-06 14:03 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-07 14:59 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-08 18:40 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-09 13:14 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-01 13:20 ` [PATCH v15 09/11] machine: adding s390 topology to query-cpu-fast Pierre Morel
2023-02-06 12:38 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-06 14:12 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-06 12:41 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-06 12:49 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-06 13:09 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-06 14:50 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-07 10:10 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-06 14:16 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-07 18:26 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-08 9:11 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-01 13:20 ` [PATCH v15 10/11] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: CPU_POLARITY_CHANGE qapi event Pierre Morel
2023-02-08 17:35 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-09 10:04 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-09 11:01 ` Markus Armbruster
2023-02-09 12:12 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-09 12:15 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
[not found] ` <87y1p8q7v6.fsf@pond.sub.org>
2023-02-09 12:28 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-09 13:00 ` Pierre Morel
2023-02-09 14:50 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-01 13:20 ` [PATCH v15 11/11] docs/s390x/cpu topology: document s390x cpu topology Pierre Morel
2023-02-08 16:22 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-09 17:14 ` [PATCH v15 00/11] s390x: CPU Topology Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-02-10 13:23 ` Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c2c502ca-2a1f-d29f-8931-4be7389557ee@linux.ibm.com \
--to=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=clg@kaod.org \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=nsg@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).