qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
To: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, mst@redhat.com,
	richard.henderson@linaro.org, peter.maydell@linaro.org
Cc: jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, alex.bennee@linaro.org,
	imammedo@redhat.com,  pbonzini@redhat.com, maz@kernel.org,
	will@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
	jean-philippe@linaro.org, lpieralisi@kernel.org,
	david@redhat.com, philmd@linaro.org, andrew.jones@linux.dev,
	eric.auger@redhat.com, npiggin@gmail.com, harshpb@linux.ibm.com,
	linux@armlinux.org.uk, darren@os.amperecomputing.com,
	ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com, vishnu@os.amperecomputing.com,
	karl.heubaum@oracle.com, miguel.luis@oracle.com,
	salil.mehta@opnsrc.net, zhukeqian1@huawei.com,
	wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com, wangyanan55@huawei.com,
	jiakernel2@gmail.com, maobibo@loongson.cn,
	lixianglai@loongson.cn, shahuang@redhat.com, zhao1.liu@intel.com,
	linuxarm@huawei.com, gustavo.romero@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hw/arm/virt: Move common vCPU properties in a function
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 10:00:57 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c2d13dad-8e43-43b1-9502-323da08d6720@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241103152256.202444-1-salil.mehta@huawei.com>

On 11/4/24 1:22 AM, Salil Mehta wrote:
> Refactor vCPU properties code from the `machvirt_init()` main loop with
> the following goals:
> 
> 1. Enable code reuse in future patch sets.
> 2. Improve code readability.
> 3. Separate out the one-time initialization of (secure-)Tagged memory,
>     handling potential failures early.
> 
> Note: This is a cosmetic change only; *no* functional changes are
>        intended here.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>
> ---
>   hw/arm/virt.c         | 238 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>   include/hw/arm/virt.h |   4 +
>   2 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-)
> 

With the following nitpicks addressed:

Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>

> diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c
> index 1a381e9a2b..a0d3bef875 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/virt.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c
> @@ -2091,16 +2091,126 @@ static void virt_cpu_post_init(VirtMachineState *vms, MemoryRegion *sysmem)
>       }
>   }
>   
> +static void virt_cpu_set_properties(Object *cpuobj, Error **errp)
> +{
> +    MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
> +    MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(ms);
> +    VirtMachineState *vms = VIRT_MACHINE(ms);
> +    const CPUArchIdList *possible_cpus;
> +    Error *local_err = NULL;
> +    VirtMachineClass *vmc;
> +
> +    vmc = VIRT_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(ms);
> +
> +    possible_cpus = mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids(ms);


virt_cpu_set_properties() is only called by machvirt_init() where MachineState
is passed in as parameter. So MachineState can be passed down as a parameter
instead of retriving it by qdev_get_machine(). Besides, the chunk of code can
be further compact.

static void virt_cpu_set_properties(MachineState *ms, Object *cpuobj, Error **errp)
{
     VirtMachineState *vms = VIRT_MACHINE(ms);
     MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(ms);
     VirtMachineClass *vmc = VIRT_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(ms);
     const CPUArchIdList *possible_cpus = mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids(ms);
     Error *local_err = NULL;
       :

}


> +    object_property_set_int(cpuobj, "mp-affinity",
> +                            possible_cpus->cpus[CPU(cpuobj)->cpu_index].arch_id,
> +                            NULL);
> +
> +    numa_cpu_pre_plug(&possible_cpus->cpus[CPU(cpuobj)->cpu_index],
> +                      DEVICE(cpuobj), &local_err);
> +    if (local_err) {
> +        goto out;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (!vms->secure) {
> +        object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "has_el3", false, NULL);
> +    }
> +
> +    if (!vms->virt && object_property_find(cpuobj, "has_el2")) {
> +        object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "has_el2", false, NULL);
> +    }
> +
> +    if (vmc->kvm_no_adjvtime &&
> +        object_property_find(cpuobj, "kvm-no-adjvtime")) {
> +        object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "kvm-no-adjvtime", true, NULL);
> +    }
> +
> +    if (vmc->no_kvm_steal_time &&
> +        object_property_find(cpuobj, "kvm-steal-time")) {
> +        object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "kvm-steal-time", false, NULL);
> +    }
> +
> +    if (vmc->no_pmu && object_property_find(cpuobj, "pmu")) {
> +        object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "pmu", false, NULL);
> +    }
> +
> +    if (vmc->no_tcg_lpa2 && object_property_find(cpuobj, "lpa2")) {
> +        object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "lpa2", false, NULL);
> +    }
> +
> +    if (object_property_find(cpuobj, "reset-cbar")) {
> +        object_property_set_int(cpuobj, "reset-cbar",
> +                                vms->memmap[VIRT_CPUPERIPHS].base,
> +                                &local_err);
> +        if (local_err) {
> +            goto out;
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    object_property_set_link(cpuobj, "memory", OBJECT(vms->sysmem), &local_err);
> +    if (local_err) {
> +        goto out;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (vms->secure) {
> +        object_property_set_link(cpuobj, "secure-memory",
> +                                 OBJECT(vms->secure_sysmem), &local_err);
> +        if (local_err) {
> +            goto out;
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    if (vms->mte) {
> +        if (tcg_enabled()) {
> +            /*
> +             * The property exists only if MemTag is supported.
> +             * If it is, we must allocate the ram to back that up.
> +             */
> +            if (!object_property_find(cpuobj, "tag-memory")) {
> +                error_report("MTE requested, but not supported "
> +                             "by the guest CPU");
> +                exit(1);
> +            }
> +
> +            object_property_set_link(cpuobj, "tag-memory",
> +                                     OBJECT(vms->tag_sysmem), &local_err);
> +            if (local_err) {
> +                goto out;
> +            }
> +
> +            if (vms->secure) {
> +                object_property_set_link(cpuobj, "secure-tag-memory",
> +                                         OBJECT(vms->secure_tag_sysmem),
> +                                         &local_err);
> +                if (local_err) {
> +                    goto out;
> +                }
> +            }
> +        } else if (kvm_enabled()) {
> +            kvm_arm_enable_mte(cpuobj, &local_err);
> +            if (local_err) {
> +                goto out;
> +            }
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +out:
> +    if (local_err) {
> +        error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> +    }
> +}
> +
>   static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine)
>   {
>       VirtMachineState *vms = VIRT_MACHINE(machine);
>       VirtMachineClass *vmc = VIRT_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(machine);
>       MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(machine);
>       const CPUArchIdList *possible_cpus;
> -    MemoryRegion *sysmem = get_system_memory();
> +    MemoryRegion *secure_tag_sysmem = NULL;
>       MemoryRegion *secure_sysmem = NULL;
>       MemoryRegion *tag_sysmem = NULL;
> -    MemoryRegion *secure_tag_sysmem = NULL;
> +    MemoryRegion *sysmem;
>       int n, virt_max_cpus;
>       bool firmware_loaded;
>       bool aarch64 = true;

Unnecessary change caused after the defination of @secure_tag_sysmem is moved around. Also,
I personally prefer to keep the order to define @sysmem, @secure_sysmem, @tag_sysmem and
@secure_tag_system. So this chunk of code would be something like below:

     MemoryRegion *sysmem;
     MemoryRegion *secure_sysmem = NULL;
     MemoryRegion *tag_sysmem = NULL;
     MemoryRegion *secure_tag_sysmem = NULL;

> @@ -2140,6 +2250,8 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine)
>        */
>       finalize_gic_version(vms);
>   
> +    sysmem = vms->sysmem = get_system_memory();
> +
>       if (vms->secure) {
>           /*
>            * The Secure view of the world is the same as the NonSecure,
> @@ -2147,7 +2259,7 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine)
>            * containing the system memory at low priority; any secure-only
>            * devices go in at higher priority and take precedence.
>            */
> -        secure_sysmem = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
> +        secure_sysmem = vms->secure_sysmem = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
>           memory_region_init(secure_sysmem, OBJECT(machine), "secure-memory",
>                              UINT64_MAX);
>           memory_region_add_subregion_overlap(secure_sysmem, 0, sysmem, -1);
> @@ -2220,6 +2332,33 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine)
>           exit(1);
>       }
>   
> +    if (vms->mte && !kvm_enabled() && !tcg_enabled()) {
> +        error_report("MTE requested, but not supported ");
> +        exit(1);
> +    }
> +
> +    if (vms->mte && kvm_enabled() && !kvm_arm_mte_supported()) {
> +        error_report("MTE requested, but not supported by KVM");
> +        exit(1);
> +    }
> +
> +    if (vms->mte && tcg_enabled()) {
> +        /* Create the memory region only once, but link to all cpus later */
> +        tag_sysmem = vms->tag_sysmem = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
> +        memory_region_init(tag_sysmem, OBJECT(machine),
> +                           "tag-memory", UINT64_MAX / 32);
> +
> +        if (vms->secure) {
> +            secure_tag_sysmem = vms->secure_tag_sysmem = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
> +            memory_region_init(secure_tag_sysmem, OBJECT(machine),
> +                               "secure-tag-memory", UINT64_MAX / 32);
> +
> +            /* As with ram, secure-tag takes precedence over tag.  */
> +            memory_region_add_subregion_overlap(secure_tag_sysmem, 0,
> +                                                tag_sysmem, -1);
> +        }
> +    }
> +
>       create_fdt(vms);
>   
>       assert(possible_cpus->len == max_cpus);
> @@ -2232,104 +2371,13 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine)
>           }
>   
>           cpuobj = object_new(possible_cpus->cpus[n].type);
> -        object_property_set_int(cpuobj, "mp-affinity",
> -                                possible_cpus->cpus[n].arch_id, NULL);
>   
>           cs = CPU(cpuobj);
>           cs->cpu_index = n;
>   
> -        numa_cpu_pre_plug(&possible_cpus->cpus[cs->cpu_index], DEVICE(cpuobj),
> -                          &error_fatal);
> -
>           aarch64 &= object_property_get_bool(cpuobj, "aarch64", NULL);
>   
> -        if (!vms->secure) {
> -            object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "has_el3", false, NULL);
> -        }
> -
> -        if (!vms->virt && object_property_find(cpuobj, "has_el2")) {
> -            object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "has_el2", false, NULL);
> -        }
> -
> -        if (vmc->kvm_no_adjvtime &&
> -            object_property_find(cpuobj, "kvm-no-adjvtime")) {
> -            object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "kvm-no-adjvtime", true, NULL);
> -        }
> -
> -        if (vmc->no_kvm_steal_time &&
> -            object_property_find(cpuobj, "kvm-steal-time")) {
> -            object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "kvm-steal-time", false, NULL);
> -        }
> -
> -        if (vmc->no_pmu && object_property_find(cpuobj, "pmu")) {
> -            object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "pmu", false, NULL);
> -        }
> -
> -        if (vmc->no_tcg_lpa2 && object_property_find(cpuobj, "lpa2")) {
> -            object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "lpa2", false, NULL);
> -        }
> -
> -        if (object_property_find(cpuobj, "reset-cbar")) {
> -            object_property_set_int(cpuobj, "reset-cbar",
> -                                    vms->memmap[VIRT_CPUPERIPHS].base,
> -                                    &error_abort);
> -        }
> -
> -        object_property_set_link(cpuobj, "memory", OBJECT(sysmem),
> -                                 &error_abort);
> -        if (vms->secure) {
> -            object_property_set_link(cpuobj, "secure-memory",
> -                                     OBJECT(secure_sysmem), &error_abort);
> -        }
> -
> -        if (vms->mte) {
> -            if (tcg_enabled()) {
> -                /* Create the memory region only once, but link to all cpus. */
> -                if (!tag_sysmem) {
> -                    /*
> -                     * The property exists only if MemTag is supported.
> -                     * If it is, we must allocate the ram to back that up.
> -                     */
> -                    if (!object_property_find(cpuobj, "tag-memory")) {
> -                        error_report("MTE requested, but not supported "
> -                                     "by the guest CPU");
> -                        exit(1);
> -                    }
> -
> -                    tag_sysmem = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
> -                    memory_region_init(tag_sysmem, OBJECT(machine),
> -                                       "tag-memory", UINT64_MAX / 32);
> -
> -                    if (vms->secure) {
> -                        secure_tag_sysmem = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
> -                        memory_region_init(secure_tag_sysmem, OBJECT(machine),
> -                                           "secure-tag-memory",
> -                                           UINT64_MAX / 32);
> -
> -                        /* As with ram, secure-tag takes precedence over tag. */
> -                        memory_region_add_subregion_overlap(secure_tag_sysmem,
> -                                                            0, tag_sysmem, -1);
> -                    }
> -                }
> -
> -                object_property_set_link(cpuobj, "tag-memory",
> -                                         OBJECT(tag_sysmem), &error_abort);
> -                if (vms->secure) {
> -                    object_property_set_link(cpuobj, "secure-tag-memory",
> -                                             OBJECT(secure_tag_sysmem),
> -                                             &error_abort);
> -                }
> -            } else if (kvm_enabled()) {
> -                if (!kvm_arm_mte_supported()) {
> -                    error_report("MTE requested, but not supported by KVM");
> -                    exit(1);
> -                }
> -                kvm_arm_enable_mte(cpuobj, &error_abort);
> -            } else {
> -                    error_report("MTE requested, but not supported ");
> -                    exit(1);
> -            }
> -        }
> +        virt_cpu_set_properties(cpuobj, &error_abort);
>   
>           qdev_realize(DEVICE(cpuobj), NULL, &error_fatal);
>           object_unref(cpuobj);
> diff --git a/include/hw/arm/virt.h b/include/hw/arm/virt.h
> index aca4f8061b..239f3678af 100644
> --- a/include/hw/arm/virt.h
> +++ b/include/hw/arm/virt.h
> @@ -143,6 +143,10 @@ struct VirtMachineState {
>       DeviceState *platform_bus_dev;
>       FWCfgState *fw_cfg;
>       PFlashCFI01 *flash[2];
> +    MemoryRegion *sysmem;
> +    MemoryRegion *secure_sysmem;
> +    MemoryRegion *tag_sysmem;
> +    MemoryRegion *secure_tag_sysmem;
>       bool secure;
>       bool highmem;
>       bool highmem_compact;

Thanks,
Gavin



  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-05  0:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-03 15:22 [PATCH] hw/arm/virt: Move common vCPU properties in a function Salil Mehta via
2024-11-05  0:00 ` Gavin Shan [this message]
2024-11-05 22:17   ` Salil Mehta via

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c2d13dad-8e43-43b1-9502-323da08d6720@redhat.com \
    --to=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
    --cc=darren@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=gustavo.romero@linaro.org \
    --cc=harshpb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=jiakernel2@gmail.com \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=karl.heubaum@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=lixianglai@loongson.cn \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=maobibo@loongson.cn \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=miguel.luis@oracle.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=philmd@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=salil.mehta@huawei.com \
    --cc=salil.mehta@opnsrc.net \
    --cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
    --cc=vishnu@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com \
    --cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=zhukeqian1@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).