* [PATCH] hw/arm/virt: Move common vCPU properties in a function
@ 2024-11-03 15:22 Salil Mehta via
2024-11-05 0:00 ` Gavin Shan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Salil Mehta via @ 2024-11-03 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel, qemu-arm, mst, richard.henderson, peter.maydell
Cc: salil.mehta, jonathan.cameron, alex.bennee, imammedo, pbonzini,
gshan, maz, will, oliver.upton, jean-philippe, lpieralisi, david,
philmd, andrew.jones, eric.auger, npiggin, harshpb, linux, darren,
ilkka, vishnu, karl.heubaum, miguel.luis, salil.mehta, zhukeqian1,
wangxiongfeng2, wangyanan55, jiakernel2, maobibo, lixianglai,
shahuang, zhao1.liu, linuxarm, gustavo.romero
Refactor vCPU properties code from the `machvirt_init()` main loop with
the following goals:
1. Enable code reuse in future patch sets.
2. Improve code readability.
3. Separate out the one-time initialization of (secure-)Tagged memory,
handling potential failures early.
Note: This is a cosmetic change only; *no* functional changes are
intended here.
Signed-off-by: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>
---
hw/arm/virt.c | 238 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
include/hw/arm/virt.h | 4 +
2 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c
index 1a381e9a2b..a0d3bef875 100644
--- a/hw/arm/virt.c
+++ b/hw/arm/virt.c
@@ -2091,16 +2091,126 @@ static void virt_cpu_post_init(VirtMachineState *vms, MemoryRegion *sysmem)
}
}
+static void virt_cpu_set_properties(Object *cpuobj, Error **errp)
+{
+ MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
+ MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(ms);
+ VirtMachineState *vms = VIRT_MACHINE(ms);
+ const CPUArchIdList *possible_cpus;
+ Error *local_err = NULL;
+ VirtMachineClass *vmc;
+
+ vmc = VIRT_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(ms);
+
+ possible_cpus = mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids(ms);
+ object_property_set_int(cpuobj, "mp-affinity",
+ possible_cpus->cpus[CPU(cpuobj)->cpu_index].arch_id,
+ NULL);
+
+ numa_cpu_pre_plug(&possible_cpus->cpus[CPU(cpuobj)->cpu_index],
+ DEVICE(cpuobj), &local_err);
+ if (local_err) {
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ if (!vms->secure) {
+ object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "has_el3", false, NULL);
+ }
+
+ if (!vms->virt && object_property_find(cpuobj, "has_el2")) {
+ object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "has_el2", false, NULL);
+ }
+
+ if (vmc->kvm_no_adjvtime &&
+ object_property_find(cpuobj, "kvm-no-adjvtime")) {
+ object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "kvm-no-adjvtime", true, NULL);
+ }
+
+ if (vmc->no_kvm_steal_time &&
+ object_property_find(cpuobj, "kvm-steal-time")) {
+ object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "kvm-steal-time", false, NULL);
+ }
+
+ if (vmc->no_pmu && object_property_find(cpuobj, "pmu")) {
+ object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "pmu", false, NULL);
+ }
+
+ if (vmc->no_tcg_lpa2 && object_property_find(cpuobj, "lpa2")) {
+ object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "lpa2", false, NULL);
+ }
+
+ if (object_property_find(cpuobj, "reset-cbar")) {
+ object_property_set_int(cpuobj, "reset-cbar",
+ vms->memmap[VIRT_CPUPERIPHS].base,
+ &local_err);
+ if (local_err) {
+ goto out;
+ }
+ }
+
+ object_property_set_link(cpuobj, "memory", OBJECT(vms->sysmem), &local_err);
+ if (local_err) {
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ if (vms->secure) {
+ object_property_set_link(cpuobj, "secure-memory",
+ OBJECT(vms->secure_sysmem), &local_err);
+ if (local_err) {
+ goto out;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (vms->mte) {
+ if (tcg_enabled()) {
+ /*
+ * The property exists only if MemTag is supported.
+ * If it is, we must allocate the ram to back that up.
+ */
+ if (!object_property_find(cpuobj, "tag-memory")) {
+ error_report("MTE requested, but not supported "
+ "by the guest CPU");
+ exit(1);
+ }
+
+ object_property_set_link(cpuobj, "tag-memory",
+ OBJECT(vms->tag_sysmem), &local_err);
+ if (local_err) {
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ if (vms->secure) {
+ object_property_set_link(cpuobj, "secure-tag-memory",
+ OBJECT(vms->secure_tag_sysmem),
+ &local_err);
+ if (local_err) {
+ goto out;
+ }
+ }
+ } else if (kvm_enabled()) {
+ kvm_arm_enable_mte(cpuobj, &local_err);
+ if (local_err) {
+ goto out;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+out:
+ if (local_err) {
+ error_propagate(errp, local_err);
+ }
+}
+
static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine)
{
VirtMachineState *vms = VIRT_MACHINE(machine);
VirtMachineClass *vmc = VIRT_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(machine);
MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(machine);
const CPUArchIdList *possible_cpus;
- MemoryRegion *sysmem = get_system_memory();
+ MemoryRegion *secure_tag_sysmem = NULL;
MemoryRegion *secure_sysmem = NULL;
MemoryRegion *tag_sysmem = NULL;
- MemoryRegion *secure_tag_sysmem = NULL;
+ MemoryRegion *sysmem;
int n, virt_max_cpus;
bool firmware_loaded;
bool aarch64 = true;
@@ -2140,6 +2250,8 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine)
*/
finalize_gic_version(vms);
+ sysmem = vms->sysmem = get_system_memory();
+
if (vms->secure) {
/*
* The Secure view of the world is the same as the NonSecure,
@@ -2147,7 +2259,7 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine)
* containing the system memory at low priority; any secure-only
* devices go in at higher priority and take precedence.
*/
- secure_sysmem = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
+ secure_sysmem = vms->secure_sysmem = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
memory_region_init(secure_sysmem, OBJECT(machine), "secure-memory",
UINT64_MAX);
memory_region_add_subregion_overlap(secure_sysmem, 0, sysmem, -1);
@@ -2220,6 +2332,33 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine)
exit(1);
}
+ if (vms->mte && !kvm_enabled() && !tcg_enabled()) {
+ error_report("MTE requested, but not supported ");
+ exit(1);
+ }
+
+ if (vms->mte && kvm_enabled() && !kvm_arm_mte_supported()) {
+ error_report("MTE requested, but not supported by KVM");
+ exit(1);
+ }
+
+ if (vms->mte && tcg_enabled()) {
+ /* Create the memory region only once, but link to all cpus later */
+ tag_sysmem = vms->tag_sysmem = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
+ memory_region_init(tag_sysmem, OBJECT(machine),
+ "tag-memory", UINT64_MAX / 32);
+
+ if (vms->secure) {
+ secure_tag_sysmem = vms->secure_tag_sysmem = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
+ memory_region_init(secure_tag_sysmem, OBJECT(machine),
+ "secure-tag-memory", UINT64_MAX / 32);
+
+ /* As with ram, secure-tag takes precedence over tag. */
+ memory_region_add_subregion_overlap(secure_tag_sysmem, 0,
+ tag_sysmem, -1);
+ }
+ }
+
create_fdt(vms);
assert(possible_cpus->len == max_cpus);
@@ -2232,104 +2371,13 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine)
}
cpuobj = object_new(possible_cpus->cpus[n].type);
- object_property_set_int(cpuobj, "mp-affinity",
- possible_cpus->cpus[n].arch_id, NULL);
cs = CPU(cpuobj);
cs->cpu_index = n;
- numa_cpu_pre_plug(&possible_cpus->cpus[cs->cpu_index], DEVICE(cpuobj),
- &error_fatal);
-
aarch64 &= object_property_get_bool(cpuobj, "aarch64", NULL);
- if (!vms->secure) {
- object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "has_el3", false, NULL);
- }
-
- if (!vms->virt && object_property_find(cpuobj, "has_el2")) {
- object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "has_el2", false, NULL);
- }
-
- if (vmc->kvm_no_adjvtime &&
- object_property_find(cpuobj, "kvm-no-adjvtime")) {
- object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "kvm-no-adjvtime", true, NULL);
- }
-
- if (vmc->no_kvm_steal_time &&
- object_property_find(cpuobj, "kvm-steal-time")) {
- object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "kvm-steal-time", false, NULL);
- }
-
- if (vmc->no_pmu && object_property_find(cpuobj, "pmu")) {
- object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "pmu", false, NULL);
- }
-
- if (vmc->no_tcg_lpa2 && object_property_find(cpuobj, "lpa2")) {
- object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "lpa2", false, NULL);
- }
-
- if (object_property_find(cpuobj, "reset-cbar")) {
- object_property_set_int(cpuobj, "reset-cbar",
- vms->memmap[VIRT_CPUPERIPHS].base,
- &error_abort);
- }
-
- object_property_set_link(cpuobj, "memory", OBJECT(sysmem),
- &error_abort);
- if (vms->secure) {
- object_property_set_link(cpuobj, "secure-memory",
- OBJECT(secure_sysmem), &error_abort);
- }
-
- if (vms->mte) {
- if (tcg_enabled()) {
- /* Create the memory region only once, but link to all cpus. */
- if (!tag_sysmem) {
- /*
- * The property exists only if MemTag is supported.
- * If it is, we must allocate the ram to back that up.
- */
- if (!object_property_find(cpuobj, "tag-memory")) {
- error_report("MTE requested, but not supported "
- "by the guest CPU");
- exit(1);
- }
-
- tag_sysmem = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
- memory_region_init(tag_sysmem, OBJECT(machine),
- "tag-memory", UINT64_MAX / 32);
-
- if (vms->secure) {
- secure_tag_sysmem = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
- memory_region_init(secure_tag_sysmem, OBJECT(machine),
- "secure-tag-memory",
- UINT64_MAX / 32);
-
- /* As with ram, secure-tag takes precedence over tag. */
- memory_region_add_subregion_overlap(secure_tag_sysmem,
- 0, tag_sysmem, -1);
- }
- }
-
- object_property_set_link(cpuobj, "tag-memory",
- OBJECT(tag_sysmem), &error_abort);
- if (vms->secure) {
- object_property_set_link(cpuobj, "secure-tag-memory",
- OBJECT(secure_tag_sysmem),
- &error_abort);
- }
- } else if (kvm_enabled()) {
- if (!kvm_arm_mte_supported()) {
- error_report("MTE requested, but not supported by KVM");
- exit(1);
- }
- kvm_arm_enable_mte(cpuobj, &error_abort);
- } else {
- error_report("MTE requested, but not supported ");
- exit(1);
- }
- }
+ virt_cpu_set_properties(cpuobj, &error_abort);
qdev_realize(DEVICE(cpuobj), NULL, &error_fatal);
object_unref(cpuobj);
diff --git a/include/hw/arm/virt.h b/include/hw/arm/virt.h
index aca4f8061b..239f3678af 100644
--- a/include/hw/arm/virt.h
+++ b/include/hw/arm/virt.h
@@ -143,6 +143,10 @@ struct VirtMachineState {
DeviceState *platform_bus_dev;
FWCfgState *fw_cfg;
PFlashCFI01 *flash[2];
+ MemoryRegion *sysmem;
+ MemoryRegion *secure_sysmem;
+ MemoryRegion *tag_sysmem;
+ MemoryRegion *secure_tag_sysmem;
bool secure;
bool highmem;
bool highmem_compact;
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] hw/arm/virt: Move common vCPU properties in a function
2024-11-03 15:22 [PATCH] hw/arm/virt: Move common vCPU properties in a function Salil Mehta via
@ 2024-11-05 0:00 ` Gavin Shan
2024-11-05 22:17 ` Salil Mehta via
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gavin Shan @ 2024-11-05 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Salil Mehta, qemu-devel, qemu-arm, mst, richard.henderson,
peter.maydell
Cc: jonathan.cameron, alex.bennee, imammedo, pbonzini, maz, will,
oliver.upton, jean-philippe, lpieralisi, david, philmd,
andrew.jones, eric.auger, npiggin, harshpb, linux, darren, ilkka,
vishnu, karl.heubaum, miguel.luis, salil.mehta, zhukeqian1,
wangxiongfeng2, wangyanan55, jiakernel2, maobibo, lixianglai,
shahuang, zhao1.liu, linuxarm, gustavo.romero
On 11/4/24 1:22 AM, Salil Mehta wrote:
> Refactor vCPU properties code from the `machvirt_init()` main loop with
> the following goals:
>
> 1. Enable code reuse in future patch sets.
> 2. Improve code readability.
> 3. Separate out the one-time initialization of (secure-)Tagged memory,
> handling potential failures early.
>
> Note: This is a cosmetic change only; *no* functional changes are
> intended here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>
> ---
> hw/arm/virt.c | 238 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> include/hw/arm/virt.h | 4 +
> 2 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-)
>
With the following nitpicks addressed:
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
> diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c
> index 1a381e9a2b..a0d3bef875 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/virt.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c
> @@ -2091,16 +2091,126 @@ static void virt_cpu_post_init(VirtMachineState *vms, MemoryRegion *sysmem)
> }
> }
>
> +static void virt_cpu_set_properties(Object *cpuobj, Error **errp)
> +{
> + MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
> + MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(ms);
> + VirtMachineState *vms = VIRT_MACHINE(ms);
> + const CPUArchIdList *possible_cpus;
> + Error *local_err = NULL;
> + VirtMachineClass *vmc;
> +
> + vmc = VIRT_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(ms);
> +
> + possible_cpus = mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids(ms);
virt_cpu_set_properties() is only called by machvirt_init() where MachineState
is passed in as parameter. So MachineState can be passed down as a parameter
instead of retriving it by qdev_get_machine(). Besides, the chunk of code can
be further compact.
static void virt_cpu_set_properties(MachineState *ms, Object *cpuobj, Error **errp)
{
VirtMachineState *vms = VIRT_MACHINE(ms);
MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(ms);
VirtMachineClass *vmc = VIRT_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(ms);
const CPUArchIdList *possible_cpus = mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids(ms);
Error *local_err = NULL;
:
}
> + object_property_set_int(cpuobj, "mp-affinity",
> + possible_cpus->cpus[CPU(cpuobj)->cpu_index].arch_id,
> + NULL);
> +
> + numa_cpu_pre_plug(&possible_cpus->cpus[CPU(cpuobj)->cpu_index],
> + DEVICE(cpuobj), &local_err);
> + if (local_err) {
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + if (!vms->secure) {
> + object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "has_el3", false, NULL);
> + }
> +
> + if (!vms->virt && object_property_find(cpuobj, "has_el2")) {
> + object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "has_el2", false, NULL);
> + }
> +
> + if (vmc->kvm_no_adjvtime &&
> + object_property_find(cpuobj, "kvm-no-adjvtime")) {
> + object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "kvm-no-adjvtime", true, NULL);
> + }
> +
> + if (vmc->no_kvm_steal_time &&
> + object_property_find(cpuobj, "kvm-steal-time")) {
> + object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "kvm-steal-time", false, NULL);
> + }
> +
> + if (vmc->no_pmu && object_property_find(cpuobj, "pmu")) {
> + object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "pmu", false, NULL);
> + }
> +
> + if (vmc->no_tcg_lpa2 && object_property_find(cpuobj, "lpa2")) {
> + object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "lpa2", false, NULL);
> + }
> +
> + if (object_property_find(cpuobj, "reset-cbar")) {
> + object_property_set_int(cpuobj, "reset-cbar",
> + vms->memmap[VIRT_CPUPERIPHS].base,
> + &local_err);
> + if (local_err) {
> + goto out;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + object_property_set_link(cpuobj, "memory", OBJECT(vms->sysmem), &local_err);
> + if (local_err) {
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + if (vms->secure) {
> + object_property_set_link(cpuobj, "secure-memory",
> + OBJECT(vms->secure_sysmem), &local_err);
> + if (local_err) {
> + goto out;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (vms->mte) {
> + if (tcg_enabled()) {
> + /*
> + * The property exists only if MemTag is supported.
> + * If it is, we must allocate the ram to back that up.
> + */
> + if (!object_property_find(cpuobj, "tag-memory")) {
> + error_report("MTE requested, but not supported "
> + "by the guest CPU");
> + exit(1);
> + }
> +
> + object_property_set_link(cpuobj, "tag-memory",
> + OBJECT(vms->tag_sysmem), &local_err);
> + if (local_err) {
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + if (vms->secure) {
> + object_property_set_link(cpuobj, "secure-tag-memory",
> + OBJECT(vms->secure_tag_sysmem),
> + &local_err);
> + if (local_err) {
> + goto out;
> + }
> + }
> + } else if (kvm_enabled()) {
> + kvm_arm_enable_mte(cpuobj, &local_err);
> + if (local_err) {
> + goto out;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> +out:
> + if (local_err) {
> + error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine)
> {
> VirtMachineState *vms = VIRT_MACHINE(machine);
> VirtMachineClass *vmc = VIRT_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(machine);
> MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(machine);
> const CPUArchIdList *possible_cpus;
> - MemoryRegion *sysmem = get_system_memory();
> + MemoryRegion *secure_tag_sysmem = NULL;
> MemoryRegion *secure_sysmem = NULL;
> MemoryRegion *tag_sysmem = NULL;
> - MemoryRegion *secure_tag_sysmem = NULL;
> + MemoryRegion *sysmem;
> int n, virt_max_cpus;
> bool firmware_loaded;
> bool aarch64 = true;
Unnecessary change caused after the defination of @secure_tag_sysmem is moved around. Also,
I personally prefer to keep the order to define @sysmem, @secure_sysmem, @tag_sysmem and
@secure_tag_system. So this chunk of code would be something like below:
MemoryRegion *sysmem;
MemoryRegion *secure_sysmem = NULL;
MemoryRegion *tag_sysmem = NULL;
MemoryRegion *secure_tag_sysmem = NULL;
> @@ -2140,6 +2250,8 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine)
> */
> finalize_gic_version(vms);
>
> + sysmem = vms->sysmem = get_system_memory();
> +
> if (vms->secure) {
> /*
> * The Secure view of the world is the same as the NonSecure,
> @@ -2147,7 +2259,7 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine)
> * containing the system memory at low priority; any secure-only
> * devices go in at higher priority and take precedence.
> */
> - secure_sysmem = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
> + secure_sysmem = vms->secure_sysmem = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
> memory_region_init(secure_sysmem, OBJECT(machine), "secure-memory",
> UINT64_MAX);
> memory_region_add_subregion_overlap(secure_sysmem, 0, sysmem, -1);
> @@ -2220,6 +2332,33 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine)
> exit(1);
> }
>
> + if (vms->mte && !kvm_enabled() && !tcg_enabled()) {
> + error_report("MTE requested, but not supported ");
> + exit(1);
> + }
> +
> + if (vms->mte && kvm_enabled() && !kvm_arm_mte_supported()) {
> + error_report("MTE requested, but not supported by KVM");
> + exit(1);
> + }
> +
> + if (vms->mte && tcg_enabled()) {
> + /* Create the memory region only once, but link to all cpus later */
> + tag_sysmem = vms->tag_sysmem = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
> + memory_region_init(tag_sysmem, OBJECT(machine),
> + "tag-memory", UINT64_MAX / 32);
> +
> + if (vms->secure) {
> + secure_tag_sysmem = vms->secure_tag_sysmem = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
> + memory_region_init(secure_tag_sysmem, OBJECT(machine),
> + "secure-tag-memory", UINT64_MAX / 32);
> +
> + /* As with ram, secure-tag takes precedence over tag. */
> + memory_region_add_subregion_overlap(secure_tag_sysmem, 0,
> + tag_sysmem, -1);
> + }
> + }
> +
> create_fdt(vms);
>
> assert(possible_cpus->len == max_cpus);
> @@ -2232,104 +2371,13 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine)
> }
>
> cpuobj = object_new(possible_cpus->cpus[n].type);
> - object_property_set_int(cpuobj, "mp-affinity",
> - possible_cpus->cpus[n].arch_id, NULL);
>
> cs = CPU(cpuobj);
> cs->cpu_index = n;
>
> - numa_cpu_pre_plug(&possible_cpus->cpus[cs->cpu_index], DEVICE(cpuobj),
> - &error_fatal);
> -
> aarch64 &= object_property_get_bool(cpuobj, "aarch64", NULL);
>
> - if (!vms->secure) {
> - object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "has_el3", false, NULL);
> - }
> -
> - if (!vms->virt && object_property_find(cpuobj, "has_el2")) {
> - object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "has_el2", false, NULL);
> - }
> -
> - if (vmc->kvm_no_adjvtime &&
> - object_property_find(cpuobj, "kvm-no-adjvtime")) {
> - object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "kvm-no-adjvtime", true, NULL);
> - }
> -
> - if (vmc->no_kvm_steal_time &&
> - object_property_find(cpuobj, "kvm-steal-time")) {
> - object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "kvm-steal-time", false, NULL);
> - }
> -
> - if (vmc->no_pmu && object_property_find(cpuobj, "pmu")) {
> - object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "pmu", false, NULL);
> - }
> -
> - if (vmc->no_tcg_lpa2 && object_property_find(cpuobj, "lpa2")) {
> - object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "lpa2", false, NULL);
> - }
> -
> - if (object_property_find(cpuobj, "reset-cbar")) {
> - object_property_set_int(cpuobj, "reset-cbar",
> - vms->memmap[VIRT_CPUPERIPHS].base,
> - &error_abort);
> - }
> -
> - object_property_set_link(cpuobj, "memory", OBJECT(sysmem),
> - &error_abort);
> - if (vms->secure) {
> - object_property_set_link(cpuobj, "secure-memory",
> - OBJECT(secure_sysmem), &error_abort);
> - }
> -
> - if (vms->mte) {
> - if (tcg_enabled()) {
> - /* Create the memory region only once, but link to all cpus. */
> - if (!tag_sysmem) {
> - /*
> - * The property exists only if MemTag is supported.
> - * If it is, we must allocate the ram to back that up.
> - */
> - if (!object_property_find(cpuobj, "tag-memory")) {
> - error_report("MTE requested, but not supported "
> - "by the guest CPU");
> - exit(1);
> - }
> -
> - tag_sysmem = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
> - memory_region_init(tag_sysmem, OBJECT(machine),
> - "tag-memory", UINT64_MAX / 32);
> -
> - if (vms->secure) {
> - secure_tag_sysmem = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
> - memory_region_init(secure_tag_sysmem, OBJECT(machine),
> - "secure-tag-memory",
> - UINT64_MAX / 32);
> -
> - /* As with ram, secure-tag takes precedence over tag. */
> - memory_region_add_subregion_overlap(secure_tag_sysmem,
> - 0, tag_sysmem, -1);
> - }
> - }
> -
> - object_property_set_link(cpuobj, "tag-memory",
> - OBJECT(tag_sysmem), &error_abort);
> - if (vms->secure) {
> - object_property_set_link(cpuobj, "secure-tag-memory",
> - OBJECT(secure_tag_sysmem),
> - &error_abort);
> - }
> - } else if (kvm_enabled()) {
> - if (!kvm_arm_mte_supported()) {
> - error_report("MTE requested, but not supported by KVM");
> - exit(1);
> - }
> - kvm_arm_enable_mte(cpuobj, &error_abort);
> - } else {
> - error_report("MTE requested, but not supported ");
> - exit(1);
> - }
> - }
> + virt_cpu_set_properties(cpuobj, &error_abort);
>
> qdev_realize(DEVICE(cpuobj), NULL, &error_fatal);
> object_unref(cpuobj);
> diff --git a/include/hw/arm/virt.h b/include/hw/arm/virt.h
> index aca4f8061b..239f3678af 100644
> --- a/include/hw/arm/virt.h
> +++ b/include/hw/arm/virt.h
> @@ -143,6 +143,10 @@ struct VirtMachineState {
> DeviceState *platform_bus_dev;
> FWCfgState *fw_cfg;
> PFlashCFI01 *flash[2];
> + MemoryRegion *sysmem;
> + MemoryRegion *secure_sysmem;
> + MemoryRegion *tag_sysmem;
> + MemoryRegion *secure_tag_sysmem;
> bool secure;
> bool highmem;
> bool highmem_compact;
Thanks,
Gavin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] hw/arm/virt: Move common vCPU properties in a function
2024-11-05 0:00 ` Gavin Shan
@ 2024-11-05 22:17 ` Salil Mehta via
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Salil Mehta via @ 2024-11-05 22:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gavin Shan, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org,
mst@redhat.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org,
peter.maydell@linaro.org
Cc: Jonathan Cameron, alex.bennee@linaro.org, imammedo@redhat.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, maz@kernel.org, will@kernel.org,
oliver.upton@linux.dev, jean-philippe@linaro.org,
lpieralisi@kernel.org, david@redhat.com, philmd@linaro.org,
andrew.jones@linux.dev, eric.auger@redhat.com, npiggin@gmail.com,
harshpb@linux.ibm.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
darren@os.amperecomputing.com, ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com,
vishnu@os.amperecomputing.com, karl.heubaum@oracle.com,
miguel.luis@oracle.com, salil.mehta@opnsrc.net, zhukeqian,
wangxiongfeng (C), wangyanan (Y), jiakernel2@gmail.com,
maobibo@loongson.cn, lixianglai@loongson.cn, shahuang@redhat.com,
zhao1.liu@intel.com, Linuxarm, gustavo.romero@linaro.org
Hi Gavin,
Thanks for the valuable comments. I will address them but it looks peter has already
pulled ARM changes for this cycle?
Thanks
Salil.
> From: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2024 12:01 AM
> To: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>; qemu-devel@nongnu.org;
> qemu-arm@nongnu.org; mst@redhat.com; richard.henderson@linaro.org;
> peter.maydell@linaro.org
> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>;
> alex.bennee@linaro.org; imammedo@redhat.com; pbonzini@redhat.com;
> maz@kernel.org; will@kernel.org; oliver.upton@linux.dev; jean-
> philippe@linaro.org; lpieralisi@kernel.org; david@redhat.com;
> philmd@linaro.org; andrew.jones@linux.dev; eric.auger@redhat.com;
> npiggin@gmail.com; harshpb@linux.ibm.com; linux@armlinux.org.uk;
> darren@os.amperecomputing.com; ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com;
> vishnu@os.amperecomputing.com; karl.heubaum@oracle.com;
> miguel.luis@oracle.com; salil.mehta@opnsrc.net; zhukeqian
> <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>; wangxiongfeng (C)
> <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>; wangyanan (Y)
> <wangyanan55@huawei.com>; jiakernel2@gmail.com;
> maobibo@loongson.cn; lixianglai@loongson.cn; shahuang@redhat.com;
> zhao1.liu@intel.com; Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>;
> gustavo.romero@linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] hw/arm/virt: Move common vCPU properties in a
> function
>
> On 11/4/24 1:22 AM, Salil Mehta wrote:
> > Refactor vCPU properties code from the `machvirt_init()` main loop
> > with the following goals:
> >
> > 1. Enable code reuse in future patch sets.
> > 2. Improve code readability.
> > 3. Separate out the one-time initialization of (secure-)Tagged memory,
> > handling potential failures early.
> >
> > Note: This is a cosmetic change only; *no* functional changes are
> > intended here.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>
> > ---
> > hw/arm/virt.c | 238 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > include/hw/arm/virt.h | 4 +
> > 2 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-)
> >
>
> With the following nitpicks addressed:
>
> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
>
> > diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c index
> > 1a381e9a2b..a0d3bef875 100644
> > --- a/hw/arm/virt.c
> > +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c
> > @@ -2091,16 +2091,126 @@ static void
> virt_cpu_post_init(VirtMachineState *vms, MemoryRegion *sysmem)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +static void virt_cpu_set_properties(Object *cpuobj, Error **errp) {
> > + MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
> > + MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(ms);
> > + VirtMachineState *vms = VIRT_MACHINE(ms);
> > + const CPUArchIdList *possible_cpus;
> > + Error *local_err = NULL;
> > + VirtMachineClass *vmc;
> > +
> > + vmc = VIRT_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(ms);
> > +
> > + possible_cpus = mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids(ms);
>
>
> virt_cpu_set_properties() is only called by machvirt_init() where
> MachineState is passed in as parameter. So MachineState can be passed
> down as a parameter instead of retriving it by qdev_get_machine().
> Besides, the chunk of code can be further compact.
>
> static void virt_cpu_set_properties(MachineState *ms, Object *cpuobj,
> Error **errp) {
> VirtMachineState *vms = VIRT_MACHINE(ms);
> MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(ms);
> VirtMachineClass *vmc = VIRT_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(ms);
> const CPUArchIdList *possible_cpus = mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids(ms);
> Error *local_err = NULL;
> :
>
> }
>
>
> > + object_property_set_int(cpuobj, "mp-affinity",
> > + possible_cpus->cpus[CPU(cpuobj)->cpu_index].arch_id,
> > + NULL);
> > +
> > + numa_cpu_pre_plug(&possible_cpus->cpus[CPU(cpuobj)-
> >cpu_index],
> > + DEVICE(cpuobj), &local_err);
> > + if (local_err) {
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!vms->secure) {
> > + object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "has_el3", false, NULL);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!vms->virt && object_property_find(cpuobj, "has_el2")) {
> > + object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "has_el2", false, NULL);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (vmc->kvm_no_adjvtime &&
> > + object_property_find(cpuobj, "kvm-no-adjvtime")) {
> > + object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "kvm-no-adjvtime", true, NULL);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (vmc->no_kvm_steal_time &&
> > + object_property_find(cpuobj, "kvm-steal-time")) {
> > + object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "kvm-steal-time", false, NULL);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (vmc->no_pmu && object_property_find(cpuobj, "pmu")) {
> > + object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "pmu", false, NULL);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (vmc->no_tcg_lpa2 && object_property_find(cpuobj, "lpa2")) {
> > + object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "lpa2", false, NULL);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (object_property_find(cpuobj, "reset-cbar")) {
> > + object_property_set_int(cpuobj, "reset-cbar",
> > + vms->memmap[VIRT_CPUPERIPHS].base,
> > + &local_err);
> > + if (local_err) {
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + object_property_set_link(cpuobj, "memory", OBJECT(vms->sysmem),
> &local_err);
> > + if (local_err) {
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (vms->secure) {
> > + object_property_set_link(cpuobj, "secure-memory",
> > + OBJECT(vms->secure_sysmem), &local_err);
> > + if (local_err) {
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (vms->mte) {
> > + if (tcg_enabled()) {
> > + /*
> > + * The property exists only if MemTag is supported.
> > + * If it is, we must allocate the ram to back that up.
> > + */
> > + if (!object_property_find(cpuobj, "tag-memory")) {
> > + error_report("MTE requested, but not supported "
> > + "by the guest CPU");
> > + exit(1);
> > + }
> > +
> > + object_property_set_link(cpuobj, "tag-memory",
> > + OBJECT(vms->tag_sysmem), &local_err);
> > + if (local_err) {
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (vms->secure) {
> > + object_property_set_link(cpuobj, "secure-tag-memory",
> > + OBJECT(vms->secure_tag_sysmem),
> > + &local_err);
> > + if (local_err) {
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + } else if (kvm_enabled()) {
> > + kvm_arm_enable_mte(cpuobj, &local_err);
> > + if (local_err) {
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > +out:
> > + if (local_err) {
> > + error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine)
> > {
> > VirtMachineState *vms = VIRT_MACHINE(machine);
> > VirtMachineClass *vmc = VIRT_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(machine);
> > MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(machine);
> > const CPUArchIdList *possible_cpus;
> > - MemoryRegion *sysmem = get_system_memory();
> > + MemoryRegion *secure_tag_sysmem = NULL;
> > MemoryRegion *secure_sysmem = NULL;
> > MemoryRegion *tag_sysmem = NULL;
> > - MemoryRegion *secure_tag_sysmem = NULL;
> > + MemoryRegion *sysmem;
> > int n, virt_max_cpus;
> > bool firmware_loaded;
> > bool aarch64 = true;
>
> Unnecessary change caused after the defination of @secure_tag_sysmem
> is moved around. Also, I personally prefer to keep the order to define
> @sysmem, @secure_sysmem, @tag_sysmem and @secure_tag_system.
> So this chunk of code would be something like below:
>
> MemoryRegion *sysmem;
> MemoryRegion *secure_sysmem = NULL;
> MemoryRegion *tag_sysmem = NULL;
> MemoryRegion *secure_tag_sysmem = NULL;
>
> > @@ -2140,6 +2250,8 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState
> *machine)
> > */
> > finalize_gic_version(vms);
> >
> > + sysmem = vms->sysmem = get_system_memory();
> > +
> > if (vms->secure) {
> > /*
> > * The Secure view of the world is the same as the
> > NonSecure, @@ -2147,7 +2259,7 @@ static void
> machvirt_init(MachineState *machine)
> > * containing the system memory at low priority; any secure-only
> > * devices go in at higher priority and take precedence.
> > */
> > - secure_sysmem = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
> > + secure_sysmem = vms->secure_sysmem = g_new(MemoryRegion,
> 1);
> > memory_region_init(secure_sysmem, OBJECT(machine), "secure-
> memory",
> > UINT64_MAX);
> > memory_region_add_subregion_overlap(secure_sysmem, 0,
> > sysmem, -1); @@ -2220,6 +2332,33 @@ static void
> machvirt_init(MachineState *machine)
> > exit(1);
> > }
> >
> > + if (vms->mte && !kvm_enabled() && !tcg_enabled()) {
> > + error_report("MTE requested, but not supported ");
> > + exit(1);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (vms->mte && kvm_enabled() && !kvm_arm_mte_supported()) {
> > + error_report("MTE requested, but not supported by KVM");
> > + exit(1);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (vms->mte && tcg_enabled()) {
> > + /* Create the memory region only once, but link to all cpus later */
> > + tag_sysmem = vms->tag_sysmem = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
> > + memory_region_init(tag_sysmem, OBJECT(machine),
> > + "tag-memory", UINT64_MAX / 32);
> > +
> > + if (vms->secure) {
> > + secure_tag_sysmem = vms->secure_tag_sysmem =
> g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
> > + memory_region_init(secure_tag_sysmem, OBJECT(machine),
> > + "secure-tag-memory", UINT64_MAX / 32);
> > +
> > + /* As with ram, secure-tag takes precedence over tag. */
> > + memory_region_add_subregion_overlap(secure_tag_sysmem, 0,
> > + tag_sysmem, -1);
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > create_fdt(vms);
> >
> > assert(possible_cpus->len == max_cpus); @@ -2232,104 +2371,13 @@
> > static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine)
> > }
> >
> > cpuobj = object_new(possible_cpus->cpus[n].type);
> > - object_property_set_int(cpuobj, "mp-affinity",
> > - possible_cpus->cpus[n].arch_id, NULL);
> >
> > cs = CPU(cpuobj);
> > cs->cpu_index = n;
> >
> > - numa_cpu_pre_plug(&possible_cpus->cpus[cs->cpu_index],
> DEVICE(cpuobj),
> > - &error_fatal);
> > -
> > aarch64 &= object_property_get_bool(cpuobj, "aarch64",
> > NULL);
> >
> > - if (!vms->secure) {
> > - object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "has_el3", false, NULL);
> > - }
> > -
> > - if (!vms->virt && object_property_find(cpuobj, "has_el2")) {
> > - object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "has_el2", false, NULL);
> > - }
> > -
> > - if (vmc->kvm_no_adjvtime &&
> > - object_property_find(cpuobj, "kvm-no-adjvtime")) {
> > - object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "kvm-no-adjvtime", true,
> NULL);
> > - }
> > -
> > - if (vmc->no_kvm_steal_time &&
> > - object_property_find(cpuobj, "kvm-steal-time")) {
> > - object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "kvm-steal-time", false, NULL);
> > - }
> > -
> > - if (vmc->no_pmu && object_property_find(cpuobj, "pmu")) {
> > - object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "pmu", false, NULL);
> > - }
> > -
> > - if (vmc->no_tcg_lpa2 && object_property_find(cpuobj, "lpa2")) {
> > - object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "lpa2", false, NULL);
> > - }
> > -
> > - if (object_property_find(cpuobj, "reset-cbar")) {
> > - object_property_set_int(cpuobj, "reset-cbar",
> > - vms->memmap[VIRT_CPUPERIPHS].base,
> > - &error_abort);
> > - }
> > -
> > - object_property_set_link(cpuobj, "memory", OBJECT(sysmem),
> > - &error_abort);
> > - if (vms->secure) {
> > - object_property_set_link(cpuobj, "secure-memory",
> > - OBJECT(secure_sysmem), &error_abort);
> > - }
> > -
> > - if (vms->mte) {
> > - if (tcg_enabled()) {
> > - /* Create the memory region only once, but link to all cpus. */
> > - if (!tag_sysmem) {
> > - /*
> > - * The property exists only if MemTag is supported.
> > - * If it is, we must allocate the ram to back that up.
> > - */
> > - if (!object_property_find(cpuobj, "tag-memory")) {
> > - error_report("MTE requested, but not supported "
> > - "by the guest CPU");
> > - exit(1);
> > - }
> > -
> > - tag_sysmem = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
> > - memory_region_init(tag_sysmem, OBJECT(machine),
> > - "tag-memory", UINT64_MAX / 32);
> > -
> > - if (vms->secure) {
> > - secure_tag_sysmem = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
> > - memory_region_init(secure_tag_sysmem, OBJECT(machine),
> > - "secure-tag-memory",
> > - UINT64_MAX / 32);
> > -
> > - /* As with ram, secure-tag takes precedence over tag. */
> > -
> memory_region_add_subregion_overlap(secure_tag_sysmem,
> > - 0, tag_sysmem, -1);
> > - }
> > - }
> > -
> > - object_property_set_link(cpuobj, "tag-memory",
> > - OBJECT(tag_sysmem), &error_abort);
> > - if (vms->secure) {
> > - object_property_set_link(cpuobj, "secure-tag-memory",
> > - OBJECT(secure_tag_sysmem),
> > - &error_abort);
> > - }
> > - } else if (kvm_enabled()) {
> > - if (!kvm_arm_mte_supported()) {
> > - error_report("MTE requested, but not supported by KVM");
> > - exit(1);
> > - }
> > - kvm_arm_enable_mte(cpuobj, &error_abort);
> > - } else {
> > - error_report("MTE requested, but not supported ");
> > - exit(1);
> > - }
> > - }
> > + virt_cpu_set_properties(cpuobj, &error_abort);
> >
> > qdev_realize(DEVICE(cpuobj), NULL, &error_fatal);
> > object_unref(cpuobj);
> > diff --git a/include/hw/arm/virt.h b/include/hw/arm/virt.h index
> > aca4f8061b..239f3678af 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/arm/virt.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/arm/virt.h
> > @@ -143,6 +143,10 @@ struct VirtMachineState {
> > DeviceState *platform_bus_dev;
> > FWCfgState *fw_cfg;
> > PFlashCFI01 *flash[2];
> > + MemoryRegion *sysmem;
> > + MemoryRegion *secure_sysmem;
> > + MemoryRegion *tag_sysmem;
> > + MemoryRegion *secure_tag_sysmem;
> > bool secure;
> > bool highmem;
> > bool highmem_compact;
>
> Thanks,
> Gavin
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-11-05 22:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-11-03 15:22 [PATCH] hw/arm/virt: Move common vCPU properties in a function Salil Mehta via
2024-11-05 0:00 ` Gavin Shan
2024-11-05 22:17 ` Salil Mehta via
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).