qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
	Mark Kanda <mark.kanda@oracle.com>
Cc: Chris Kenna <chris.kenna@oracle.com>,
	bhavesh.davda@oracle.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] e1000: Never increment the RX undersize count register
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 11:29:46 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c2f53410-b1ea-d2a4-d28a-ffb8f1ccdd6d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190405103105.c2ohp53bitfgamax@steredhat>


On 2019/4/5 下午6:31, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 10:21:26AM -0500, Mark Kanda wrote:
>> From: Chris Kenna <chris.kenna@oracle.com>
>>
>> In situations where e1000 receives an undersized Ethernet frame,
>> QEMU increments the emulated "Receive Undersize Count (RUC)"
>> register when padding the frame.
>>
>> This is incorrect because this an expected scenario (e.g. with
>> VLAN tag stripping) and not an error. As such, QEMU should not
>> increment the emulated RUC.
>>
>> Fixes: 3b2743017749 ("e1000: Implementing various counters")
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Mark Kanda <mark.kanda@oracle.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Bhavesh Davda <bhavesh.davda@oracle.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Kenna <chris.kenna@oracle.com>
>> ---
>>   hw/net/e1000.c | 1 -
>>   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> CCing Jason.
>
> LGTM, if we don't discard it, we shouldn't increase the RUC counter.
>
> Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
>
> Thanks,
> Stefano
>

Applied.

Thanks

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
	Mark Kanda <mark.kanda@oracle.com>
Cc: bhavesh.davda@oracle.com, Chris Kenna <chris.kenna@oracle.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] e1000: Never increment the RX undersize count register
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 11:29:46 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c2f53410-b1ea-d2a4-d28a-ffb8f1ccdd6d@redhat.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190415032946.MGYpwTMhO5RIX0Qu11My-pjHtqtPxBOBIZj4xXg0QtA@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190405103105.c2ohp53bitfgamax@steredhat>


On 2019/4/5 下午6:31, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 10:21:26AM -0500, Mark Kanda wrote:
>> From: Chris Kenna <chris.kenna@oracle.com>
>>
>> In situations where e1000 receives an undersized Ethernet frame,
>> QEMU increments the emulated "Receive Undersize Count (RUC)"
>> register when padding the frame.
>>
>> This is incorrect because this an expected scenario (e.g. with
>> VLAN tag stripping) and not an error. As such, QEMU should not
>> increment the emulated RUC.
>>
>> Fixes: 3b2743017749 ("e1000: Implementing various counters")
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Mark Kanda <mark.kanda@oracle.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Bhavesh Davda <bhavesh.davda@oracle.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Kenna <chris.kenna@oracle.com>
>> ---
>>   hw/net/e1000.c | 1 -
>>   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> CCing Jason.
>
> LGTM, if we don't discard it, we shouldn't increase the RUC counter.
>
> Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
>
> Thanks,
> Stefano
>

Applied.

Thanks



  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-15  3:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-04 15:21 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] e1000: Never increment the RX undersize count register Mark Kanda
2019-04-05 10:31 ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-04-05 10:31   ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-04-15  3:29   ` Jason Wang [this message]
2019-04-15  3:29     ` Jason Wang
2019-04-15  3:35     ` Jason Wang
2019-04-15  3:35       ` Jason Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c2f53410-b1ea-d2a4-d28a-ffb8f1ccdd6d@redhat.com \
    --to=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=bhavesh.davda@oracle.com \
    --cc=chris.kenna@oracle.com \
    --cc=mark.kanda@oracle.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).