From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
To: Andrew Randrianasulu <randrianasulu@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-discuss@nongnu.org, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: dropping 32-bit host support
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 08:36:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c33b0e07-5c46-6ebe-fe4c-5308ce508a70@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+rFky5=kc0Pwf3RRhuKrBqtRVkmtm=NDKhrVgJV2_Ame2nUOQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 16/3/23 08:17, Andrew Randrianasulu wrote:
>
>
> чт, 16 мар. 2023 г., 10:05 Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org
> <mailto:philmd@linaro.org>>:
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On 16/3/23 01:57, Andrew Randrianasulu wrote:
> > Looking at https://wiki.qemu.org/ChangeLog/8.0
> <https://wiki.qemu.org/ChangeLog/8.0>
> > <https://wiki.qemu.org/ChangeLog/8.0
> <https://wiki.qemu.org/ChangeLog/8.0>>
> >
> > ===
> > System emulation on 32-bit x86 and ARM hosts has been deprecated.
> The
> > QEMU project no longer considers 32-bit x86 and ARM support for
> system
> > emulation to be an effective use of its limited resources, and thus
> > intends to discontinue.
> >
> > ==
> >
> > well, I guess arguing from memory-consuption point on 32 bit x86
> hosts
> > (like my machine where I run 32 bit userspace on 64 bit kernel)
> is not
>
> If you use a 64-bit kernel, then your host is 64-bit :)
>
>
>
> No, I mean *kernel* is 64 bit yet userspace (glibc, X , ...) all 32bit.
> So, qemu naturally will be 32-bit binary on my system.
This configuration is still supported!
Thomas, should we clarify yet again? Maybe adding examples?
> host: hardware where you run QEMU
> guest: what is run within QEMU
>
> Running 32-bit *guest* on your 64-bit *host* is still supported.
>
> We don't plan to support running 32-bit WinXP x86 (guest) on 32-bit
> Raspberry Pi 2 (host) for example.
>
> > going anywhere, but what about 32bit userspace on Android tablets,
> > either via Limbo emulator or qemu itself in Termux?
>
> *System* emulation [on 32-bit hosts] is deprecated. User emulation
> (such linux-user) is not. For example, you can still run 64-bit x86_64
> Linux binaries on a 32-bit ARM Raspberry Pi.
>
>
>
> Well, unrooted Android does not allow you to just load some perfectly
> fine kernel module, so user-space emulation can't do all things
> system-level one can. I also ran qemu-system-ppc on Huawei Matepad T8
> (32 bit Android, too) for emulating old mac os 9. Yes, I can wait 10 min
> per guest boot. Fedora 36 armhf boots even slower on emulation!
Huawei MatePad T8 is based on a MediaTek MT8768 CPU which contains
ARM Cortex-A53 cores. These cores implements the ARMv8-A 64-bit ISA,
so theoretically it is able to run a 64-bit Android.
> > At least I hope it will be not *actively* (intentionally) broken,
> just
> > ...unsupported (so users who know how to run git revert still
> will get
> > their build for some more time).
>
> Unsupported code almost always unintentionally end bit-rotting...
>
>
>
> Well, sometimes simple patch restores functionality. I patched for
> example olive-editor to run on 32 bit, and before this intel embree
> (raytracing kernels for Lux renderer). So, _sometimes_ it really not
> that costly. While if this CI thing really runs per-commit and thrown
> away each result ... may be letting interested users to build things on
> their own machines (and share patches, if they develop them, publicly)
> actually good idea.
>
>
>
> I hope this is clearer.
>
> Regards,
>
> Phil.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-16 7:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CA+rFky6A9Q_5sJ4WDO-Z2HBT59qiNgr8A-xk+O7-gnAMZmHt2A@mail.gmail.com>
2023-03-16 7:05 ` dropping 32-bit host support Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-03-16 7:17 ` Andrew Randrianasulu
2023-03-16 7:36 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2023-03-16 7:44 ` Andrew Randrianasulu
2023-03-16 8:31 ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-16 9:17 ` Andrew Randrianasulu
2023-03-16 10:22 ` Andrew Randrianasulu
2023-03-16 10:56 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-03-16 11:04 ` Andrew Randrianasulu
2023-03-16 11:15 ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-16 11:02 ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-16 11:11 ` Andrew Randrianasulu
2023-03-16 12:35 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-16 13:01 ` Andrew Randrianasulu
2023-03-16 13:32 ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-16 15:21 ` Warner Losh
2023-03-16 15:29 ` Andrew Randrianasulu
2023-03-16 15:27 ` Andrew Randrianasulu
2023-03-16 15:39 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-17 8:03 ` Andrew Randrianasulu
2023-03-16 10:00 ` Markus Armbruster
2023-03-16 10:05 ` Andrew Randrianasulu
[not found] ` <3DD8295F-4BE0-4262-8C68-4A85A56D63C7@livius.net>
2023-03-16 7:29 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-03-16 7:57 ` Liviu Ionescu
2023-03-16 8:07 ` Liviu Ionescu
2023-03-16 8:36 ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-16 8:42 ` Liviu Ionescu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c33b0e07-5c46-6ebe-fe4c-5308ce508a70@linaro.org \
--to=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-discuss@nongnu.org \
--cc=randrianasulu@gmail.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).