From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
To: Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Gowtham Siddarth <gowtham.siddarth@arm.com>
Subject: Re: PCIe: SLT attribute mismatch: 0xFF020100 instead of 0x20100
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 15:57:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c3c6bab4-27e6-8812-2dc5-3d22c1ef16a5@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56aa4acb-d54c-a457-5a32-9258cec1ac96@linaro.org>
On 29/8/23 13:39, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> I am working on aarch64/sbsa-ref machine so people can have virtual
> machine to test their OS against something reminding standards compliant
> system.
>
> One of tools I use is BSA ACS (Base System Architecture - Architecture
> Compliance Suite) [1] written by Arm. It runs set of tests to check does
> system conforms to BSA specification.
>
> 1. https://github.com/ARM-software/bsa-acs
>
>
> SBSA-ref goes better and better, yet still we have some issues. One of
> them is test 822 ("Check Type 1 config header rules") which fails on
> each PCIe root port device:
>
> BDF 0x400 : SLT attribute mismatch: 0xFF020100 instead of 0x20100
> BDF 0x500 : SLT attribute mismatch: 0xFF030300 instead of 0x30300
> BDF 0x600 : SLT attribute mismatch: 0xFF040400 instead of 0x40400
>
> I reported it as an issue [2] and got response that it may be QEMU
> fault. My pcie knowledge is not good enough to know where the problem is.
>
> 2. https://github.com/ARM-software/bsa-acs/issues/193
>
>
> In the comment Gowtham Siddarth wrote:
>
>> Regarding the SLT (Secondary Latency Timer) register, the expected
>> values align with the ACS specifications, registering as 0. However, a
>> discrepancy arises in the register's attribute, intended to be set as
>> Read-Only. Contrary to this intent, the bit field seems to function
>> as> Read-Write. Ordinarily, when attempting to write to the register
>> by configuring all bits to 1, the anticipated behaviour should involve
>> rejecting the write operation, maintaining the value at 0 to uphold
>> the register's designated Read-Only nature. However, in this scenario,
>> the write action takes effect, leading to a transformation of the
>> register's value to FFs. This anomaly could potentially stem from an
>> issue within the emulator.
>
> Does someone know where the problem may be? And how to fix it?
Commit fb23162885 ("pci: initialize pci config headers depending it pci
header type.") sets PCI_SEC_LATENCY_TIMER writable; it seems to be a
mistake (and bsa-acs is doing the correct testing).
Can you try this quick fix?
-- >8 --
diff --git a/hw/pci/pci.c b/hw/pci/pci.c
index 881d774fb6..e43aa0fb36 100644
--- a/hw/pci/pci.c
+++ b/hw/pci/pci.c
@@ -894,5 +895,4 @@ static void pci_init_mask_bridge(PCIDevice *d)
{
- /* PCI_PRIMARY_BUS, PCI_SECONDARY_BUS, PCI_SUBORDINATE_BUS and
- PCI_SEC_LETENCY_TIMER */
- memset(d->wmask + PCI_PRIMARY_BUS, 0xff, 4);
+ /* PCI_PRIMARY_BUS, PCI_SECONDARY_BUS, PCI_SUBORDINATE_BUS */
+ memset(d->wmask + PCI_PRIMARY_BUS, 0xff, 3);
---
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-29 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-29 11:39 PCIe: SLT attribute mismatch: 0xFF020100 instead of 0x20100 Marcin Juszkiewicz
2023-08-29 13:14 ` Peter Maydell
2023-08-29 13:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-08-29 14:04 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-08-29 17:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-08-29 20:05 ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2023-08-29 20:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-08-29 20:31 ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2023-08-29 20:40 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-08-29 20:44 ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2023-08-29 20:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-08-30 8:22 ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2023-08-30 10:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-08-29 13:57 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2023-08-29 14:43 ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c3c6bab4-27e6-8812-2dc5-3d22c1ef16a5@linaro.org \
--to=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=gowtham.siddarth@arm.com \
--cc=marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).