From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1B4CdA-0004sD-3R for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:33:16 -0500 Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1B4Ccd-0004lb-4F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:33:14 -0500 Received: from [80.91.224.249] (helo=main.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B4Cbm-0004a3-IA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:31:50 -0500 Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B4Cbh-0007X7-00 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 06:31:45 +0100 Received: from stradivarius.ressukka.net ([212.182.193.154]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 06:31:45 +0100 Received: from ressu by stradivarius.ressukka.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 06:31:45 +0100 From: Sami Haahtinen Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 07:31:39 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4056434B.4070008@bellard.org> <1079560975.28616.1554.camel@rapid> <1079646330.17580.1.camel@rapid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <1079646330.17580.1.camel@rapid> Sender: news Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu and OS/2 Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org J. Mayer wrote: > On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 22:19, Sami Haahtinen wrote: >>The installation still crashes qemu, only thing that is different now is >>that instead of segfault i now get abort. > > My fault: > I missed to tell you to comment the abort call in Fail macro (still in > sb16.c) Ok, did this, and now it just hangs, it doesn't ask me for the next image or anything, it hangs in the first graphical OS/2 Warp logo. >>>I can't, cause I haven't got the CDROM and so OS/2 seem to hang (I think >>>the lack of CDROM may be the cause, but...) >> >>I don't think there is anything special after the first 2 disks, after >>that the installation just copies the files. so if we can get through >>the first 2 disks i would guess that things should go well after that. >>Did it ask you for the CD? > > In fact, I retried and it's now asking for disk2, so I cannot go on. Ok, if you wish to try one more disk, it's up at the same location where you got the first disks. Regards, Sami