From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1B4GzO-0006g0-HH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 05:12:30 -0500 Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1B4Gyk-0006UA-Vi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 05:12:22 -0500 Received: from [80.91.224.249] (helo=main.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B4Gyj-0006TR-Vu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 05:11:50 -0500 Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B4Gyf-0002jw-00 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:11:45 +0100 Received: from 131.207.183.245 ([131.207.183.245]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:11:45 +0100 Received: from ressu by 131.207.183.245 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:11:45 +0100 From: Sami Haahtinen Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 12:11:41 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4056434B.4070008@bellard.org> <1079560975.28616.1554.camel@rapid> <1079646330.17580.1.camel@rapid> <1079679443.20666.68.camel@rapid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <1079679443.20666.68.camel@rapid> Sender: news Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu and OS/2 Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org J. Mayer wrote: > On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 06:31, Sami Haahtinen wrote: >>J. Mayer wrote: >>>In fact, I retried and it's now asking for disk2, so I cannot go on. >> >>Ok, if you wish to try one more disk, it's up at the same location where >>you got the first disks. > > I did launch the second disk, but merlin crashes exactly the same way > OS/2 3 does, at the same address, with almost all registers identical. > As it dumps the segment limits, I'm afraid that Fabrice may be right: it > may rely on segment limits so we won't have OS/2 support soon.... Awww, too bad. i was looking forward to using OS/2 again. i don't want to dedicate a machine for it. Oh well, you can't always win. Even still, qemu is the best OS VM out there, as any of the other VMs couldn't run OS/2 either. Regards, Sami