Re: Auditing QEMU to replace NULL with &error_abort

[John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>]

On 6/23/21 8:16 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Nevertheless, I'm reluctant to add more differeneces.  That's not a
> "no".  It's a "you need to make a compelling case".

I'm not sure it's my case to make; I believe you are the authority in 
this matter so the work should be defined in terms of what you are 
prepared to accept.

I'm not sure there's a better argument for &error_ignore beyond "It's 
easy to audit", but I find that to be a compelling one especially where 
new contributors are concerned.

If we still wanted to move back to glib (which seems unlikely) replacing 
&error_ignore by NULL seems like a trivial thing to do. Your call.

--js