qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Cc: "Fam Zheng" <fam@euphon.net>,
	"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	"Eduardo Habkost" <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] Implement drain_call_rcu and use it in hmp_device_del
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2020 12:34:39 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c413edca1ae1e78a03dad7775d9a955684321ea0.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200527131148.GH29137@stefanha-x1.localdomain>

On Wed, 2020-05-27 at 14:11 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 07:09:46PM +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> >  /* The operands of the minus operator must have the same type,
> >   * which must be the one that we specify in the cast.
> > diff --git a/qdev-monitor.c b/qdev-monitor.c
> > index 56cee1483f..70877840a2 100644
> > --- a/qdev-monitor.c
> > +++ b/qdev-monitor.c
> > @@ -812,6 +812,8 @@ void qmp_device_add(QDict *qdict, QObject **ret_data, Error **errp)
> >          return;
> >      }
> >      dev = qdev_device_add(opts, &local_err);
> > +    drain_call_rcu();
> 
> Please include comments explaining what each drain waits for. Without
> comments we'll quickly lose track of why drain_call_rcu() calls are
> necessary (similar to documenting memory barrier or refcount inc/dec
> pairing).
> 
> > diff --git a/util/rcu.c b/util/rcu.c
> > index 60a37f72c3..e8b1c4d6c5 100644
> > --- a/util/rcu.c
> > +++ b/util/rcu.c
> > @@ -293,6 +293,39 @@ void call_rcu1(struct rcu_head *node, void (*func)(struct rcu_head *node))
> >      qemu_event_set(&rcu_call_ready_event);
> >  }
> >  
> > +
> > +struct rcu_drain {
> > +    struct rcu_head rcu;
> > +    QemuEvent drain_complete_event;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static void drain_rcu_callback(struct rcu_head *node)
> > +{
> > +    struct rcu_drain *event = (struct rcu_drain *)node;
> > +    qemu_event_set(&event->drain_complete_event);
> 
> A comment would be nice explaining that callbacks are invoked in
> sequence so we're sure that all previously scheduled callbacks have
> completed when drain_rcu_callback() is invoked.
> 
> > +}
> > +
> > +void drain_call_rcu(void)
> 
> Please document that the main loop mutex is dropped if it's held. This
> will prevent surprises and allow callers to think about thread-safety
> across this call.

Done.
> 
> Aside from the comment requests:
> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>


Best regards,
	Maxim levitsky



  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-09  9:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-11 16:09 [PATCH v2 0/7] RFC/WIP: Fix scsi devices plug/unplug races w.r.t virtio-scsi iothread Maxim Levitsky
2020-05-11 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] scsi/scsi_bus: switch search direction in scsi_device_find Maxim Levitsky
2020-05-27 12:53   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-05-11 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] Implement drain_call_rcu and use it in hmp_device_del Maxim Levitsky
2020-05-27 13:11   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-07-09  9:34     ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2020-07-09 11:42   ` Markus Armbruster
2020-07-09 11:56     ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-07-09 12:02       ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-11 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] device-core: use RCU for list of childs of a bus Maxim Levitsky
2020-05-27 14:45   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-07-09  9:40     ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-05-11 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] device-core: use atomic_set on .realized property Maxim Levitsky
2020-05-27 15:00   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-07-09 10:24     ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-05-11 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] virtio-scsi: don't touch scsi devices that are not yet realized or about to be un-realized Maxim Levitsky
2020-05-27 15:08   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-05-11 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] scsi: Add scsi_device_get Maxim Levitsky
2020-05-27 15:27   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-07-09 10:35     ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-05-11 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] virtio-scsi: use scsi_device_get Maxim Levitsky
2020-05-27 15:50   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-07-09 10:43     ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-05-27 15:50   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-05-11 18:03 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] RFC/WIP: Fix scsi devices plug/unplug races w.r.t virtio-scsi iothread no-reply
2020-05-11 18:03 ` no-reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c413edca1ae1e78a03dad7775d9a955684321ea0.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=fam@euphon.net \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).