qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@redhat.com>
To: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	Maor Gottlieb <maorg@nvidia.com>,
	Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
	Tarun Gupta <targupta@nvidia.com>,
	Avihai Horon <avihaih@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/15] vfio/common: Record DMA mapped IOVA ranges
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 14:36:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c419c84d-12fc-fff0-3af9-04582860b89b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230307125450.62409-10-joao.m.martins@oracle.com>

On 3/7/23 13:54, Joao Martins wrote:
> According to the device DMA logging uAPI, IOVA ranges to be logged by
> the device must be provided all at once upon DMA logging start.
> 
> As preparation for the following patches which will add device dirty
> page tracking, keep a record of all DMA mapped IOVA ranges so later they
> can be used for DMA logging start.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Avihai Horon <avihaih@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
> ---
>   hw/vfio/common.c     | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   hw/vfio/trace-events |  1 +
>   2 files changed, 86 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/common.c b/hw/vfio/common.c
> index 63831eab78a1..811502dbc97c 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/common.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/common.c
> @@ -1325,11 +1325,96 @@ static int vfio_set_dirty_page_tracking(VFIOContainer *container, bool start)
>       return ret;
>   }
>   
> +typedef struct VFIODirtyRanges {
> +    hwaddr min32;
> +    hwaddr max32;
> +    hwaddr min64;
> +    hwaddr max64;
> +} VFIODirtyRanges;
> +
> +typedef struct VFIODirtyRangesListener {
> +    VFIOContainer *container;
> +    VFIODirtyRanges ranges;

I would have introduced a pointer instead, to avoid the memcpy.

Anyhow, this is minor.

Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>

Thanks,

C.


> +    MemoryListener listener;
> +} VFIODirtyRangesListener;
> +
> +static void vfio_dirty_tracking_update(MemoryListener *listener,
> +                                       MemoryRegionSection *section)
> +{
> +    VFIODirtyRangesListener *dirty = container_of(listener,
> +                                                  VFIODirtyRangesListener,
> +                                                  listener);
> +    VFIODirtyRanges *range = &dirty->ranges;
> +    hwaddr iova, end, *min, *max;
> +
> +    if (!vfio_listener_valid_section(section, "tracking_update") ||
> +        !vfio_get_section_iova_range(dirty->container, section,
> +                                     &iova, &end, NULL)) {
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    /*
> +     * The address space passed to the dirty tracker is reduced to two ranges:
> +     * one for 32-bit DMA ranges, and another one for 64-bit DMA ranges.
> +     * The underlying reports of dirty will query a sub-interval of each of
> +     * these ranges.
> +     *
> +     * The purpose of the dual range handling is to handle known cases of big
> +     * holes in the address space, like the x86 AMD 1T hole. The alternative
> +     * would be an IOVATree but that has a much bigger runtime overhead and
> +     * unnecessary complexity.
> +     */
> +    min = (end <= UINT32_MAX) ? &range->min32 : &range->min64;
> +    max = (end <= UINT32_MAX) ? &range->max32 : &range->max64;
> +
> +    if (*min > iova) {
> +        *min = iova;
> +    }
> +    if (*max < end) {
> +        *max = end;
> +    }
> +
> +    trace_vfio_device_dirty_tracking_update(iova, end, *min, *max);
> +    return;
> +}
> +
> +static const MemoryListener vfio_dirty_tracking_listener = {
> +    .name = "vfio-tracking",
> +    .region_add = vfio_dirty_tracking_update,
> +};
> +
> +static void vfio_dirty_tracking_init(VFIOContainer *container,
> +                                     VFIODirtyRanges *ranges)
> +{
> +    VFIODirtyRangesListener dirty;
> +
> +    memset(&dirty, 0, sizeof(dirty));
> +    dirty.ranges.min32 = UINT32_MAX;
> +    dirty.ranges.min64 = UINT64_MAX;
> +    dirty.listener = vfio_dirty_tracking_listener;
> +    dirty.container = container;
> +
> +    memory_listener_register(&dirty.listener,
> +                             container->space->as);
> +
> +    *ranges = dirty.ranges;
> +
> +    /*
> +     * The memory listener is synchronous, and used to calculate the range
> +     * to dirty tracking. Unregister it after we are done as we are not
> +     * interested in any follow-up updates.
> +     */
> +    memory_listener_unregister(&dirty.listener);
> +}
> +
>   static void vfio_listener_log_global_start(MemoryListener *listener)
>   {
>       VFIOContainer *container = container_of(listener, VFIOContainer, listener);
> +    VFIODirtyRanges ranges;
>       int ret;
>   
> +    vfio_dirty_tracking_init(container, &ranges);
> +
>       ret = vfio_set_dirty_page_tracking(container, true);
>       if (ret) {
>           vfio_set_migration_error(ret);
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/trace-events b/hw/vfio/trace-events
> index 7173e6a5c721..dd9fd7b9bddb 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/trace-events
> +++ b/hw/vfio/trace-events
> @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ vfio_listener_region_add_ram(uint64_t iova_start, uint64_t iova_end, void *vaddr
>   vfio_known_safe_misalignment(const char *name, uint64_t iova, uint64_t offset_within_region, uintptr_t page_size) "Region \"%s\" iova=0x%"PRIx64" offset_within_region=0x%"PRIx64" qemu_real_host_page_size=0x%"PRIxPTR
>   vfio_listener_region_add_no_dma_map(const char *name, uint64_t iova, uint64_t size, uint64_t page_size) "Region \"%s\" 0x%"PRIx64" size=0x%"PRIx64" is not aligned to 0x%"PRIx64" and cannot be mapped for DMA"
>   vfio_listener_region_del(uint64_t start, uint64_t end) "region_del 0x%"PRIx64" - 0x%"PRIx64
> +vfio_device_dirty_tracking_update(uint64_t start, uint64_t end, uint64_t min, uint64_t max) "section 0x%"PRIx64" - 0x%"PRIx64" -> update [0x%"PRIx64" - 0x%"PRIx64"]"
>   vfio_disconnect_container(int fd) "close container->fd=%d"
>   vfio_put_group(int fd) "close group->fd=%d"
>   vfio_get_device(const char * name, unsigned int flags, unsigned int num_regions, unsigned int num_irqs) "Device %s flags: %u, regions: %u, irqs: %u"



  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-07 13:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-07 12:54 [PATCH v5 00/15] vfio/migration: Device dirty page tracking Joao Martins
2023-03-07 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 01/15] vfio/common: Fix error reporting in vfio_get_dirty_bitmap() Joao Martins
2023-03-07 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 02/15] vfio/common: Fix wrong %m usages Joao Martins
2023-03-07 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 03/15] vfio/common: Abort migration if dirty log start/stop/sync fails Joao Martins
2023-03-07 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 04/15] vfio/common: Add VFIOBitmap and alloc function Joao Martins
2023-03-07 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 05/15] vfio/common: Add helper to validate iova/end against hostwin Joao Martins
2023-03-07 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 06/15] vfio/common: Use a single tracepoint for skipped sections Joao Martins
2023-03-07 13:27   ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-03-07 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 07/15] vfio/common: Consolidate skip/invalid section into helper Joao Martins
2023-03-07 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 08/15] vfio/common: Add helper to consolidate iova/end calculation Joao Martins
2023-03-07 13:28   ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-03-07 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 09/15] vfio/common: Record DMA mapped IOVA ranges Joao Martins
2023-03-07 13:36   ` Cédric Le Goater [this message]
2023-03-07 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 10/15] vfio/common: Add device dirty page tracking start/stop Joao Martins
2023-03-07 14:49   ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-03-07 14:54     ` Joao Martins
2023-03-07 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 11/15] vfio/common: Extract code from vfio_get_dirty_bitmap() to new function Joao Martins
2023-03-07 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 12/15] vfio/common: Add device dirty page bitmap sync Joao Martins
2023-03-07 15:16   ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-03-07 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 13/15] vfio/migration: Block migration with vIOMMU Joao Martins
2023-03-07 16:38   ` Alex Williamson
2023-03-07 16:42     ` Alex Williamson
2023-03-07 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 14/15] vfio/migration: Query device dirty page tracking support Joao Martins
2023-03-07 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 15/15] docs/devel: Document VFIO device dirty page tracking Joao Martins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c419c84d-12fc-fff0-3af9-04582860b89b@redhat.com \
    --to=clg@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=avihaih@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=maorg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=targupta@nvidia.com \
    --cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).