From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36821) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8nsM-0001PK-9m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2017 09:11:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8nsJ-0002mo-4P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2017 09:11:26 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37172) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8nsI-0002mM-U9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2017 09:11:23 -0400 References: <6e9a0dff-949f-5ac9-2315-cbe0e4c99f58@redhat.com> <0c725626-6485-c777-46e3-99423670df89@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 15:11:19 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Guest SIGILL when different IO is implemented List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Miltiadis Hatzimihail Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 11/05/2017 14:47, Miltiadis Hatzimihail wrote: > That's great thanks for the clarification. > > Is this patch going to make it to the mainline at some point? Not exactly as is, because it has a small defect (it always reads 16 bytes from memory), but something like that will. Paolo