From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: slirp: Can I get IPv6-only DHCP working?
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 09:21:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c44e41ee-cdf8-a808-b685-fa43306b83f3@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YwgCjqC90KhDKUnr@pdel-fedora-MJ0HJWH9>
On 26/08/2022 01.15, Peter Delevoryas wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 12:56:10AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Peter Delevoryas, le jeu. 25 août 2022 15:38:53 -0700, a ecrit:
>>> It seems like there's support for an IPv6 dns proxy, and there's literally a
>>> file called "dhcpv6.c" in slirp, but it has a comment saying it only supports
>>> whatever is necessary for TFTP network boot I guess.
>>
>> For which DNS support is welcome :)
>>
>>> Maybe there's no support then?
>>
>> It seems there is:
>>
>> if (ri.want_dns) {
>> *resp++ = OPTION_DNS_SERVERS >> 8; /* option-code high byte */
>> *resp++ = OPTION_DNS_SERVERS; /* option-code low byte */
>> *resp++ = 0; /* option-len high byte */
>> *resp++ = 16; /* option-len low byte */
>> memcpy(resp, &slirp->vnameserver_addr6, 16);
>> resp += 16;
>> }
>
> Well, that's great, but actually I just care about whether slirp supports DHCPv6
> address requests. Sorry if I didn't explain that properly.
>
> My goal is to run:
>
> qemu-system-arm -machine fby35-bmc -nographic -mtdblock image-bmc \
> -net nic,model=ftgmac100,netdev=nic \
> -netdev user,id=nic,hostfwd=::2222-:22
>
> And then see that the BMC received an IPv6 address assignment.
>
> But, slirp currently just supports IP address assignment through BOOTP? I
> didn't realize that until looking a little closer at the code.
No, slirp support "IPv6 *stateless* address assignment" (if you haven't
heard about that before, I suggest to google it). That means that IPv6
addresses are not administered by a DHCP server, but that each client can
built its own IPv6 address. It basically works like this (don't quote me on
that, it's been a while since I worked with this stuff): Once the network
interface of the client gets activated, the OS creates a link-local IPv6
that can be only used for activating on the link (based on the MAC address).
It then uses this address for sending a "router solicitation" message, and
if there is a router on the link, it replies with a "router advertisment"
that contains a routable prefix. The client then can take this prefix to
form a unique IPv6 address and assign it to its interface. QEMU/slirp
support this way of address assignment, see ndp_send_na() in ip6_icmp.c.
So if your BMC code supports stateless IPv6 address (it certainly should),
you should be fine already).
HTH,
Thomas
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-26 7:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-25 22:38 slirp: Can I get IPv6-only DHCP working? Peter Delevoryas
2022-08-25 22:56 ` Samuel Thibault
2022-08-25 23:15 ` Peter Delevoryas
2022-08-25 23:20 ` Samuel Thibault
2022-08-26 7:21 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c44e41ee-cdf8-a808-b685-fa43306b83f3@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).