Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/10] vhost-net: compile it for all targets

[Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>]

On 15/01/19 04:50, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 07:42:20PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 15/11/2018 15:31, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> Currently vhost-net is compiled only for KVM-enabled targets.  This is
>>> not needed anymore because ioeventfd is supported and emulated by the
>>> memory core.  Compile it and vhost-user-test for all targets.
>>> While at it, fix the annoying typo CONFIG_VHOST_NET_USED.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>>  configure              | 13 +++++--------
>>>  include/exec/poison.h  |  1 -
>>>  net/net.c              |  2 +-
>>>  tests/Makefile.include |  5 +----
>>>  4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/configure b/configure
>>> index 5b1d83ea26..d8317e1832 100755
>>> --- a/configure
>>> +++ b/configure
>>> @@ -6512,8 +6512,11 @@ fi
>>>  if test "$vhost_scsi" = "yes" ; then
>>>    echo "CONFIG_VHOST_SCSI=y" >> $config_host_mak
>>>  fi
>>> -if test "$vhost_net" = "yes" -a "$vhost_user" = "yes"; then
>>> -  echo "CONFIG_VHOST_NET_USED=y" >> $config_host_mak
>>> +if test "$vhost_net" = "yes" ; then
>>> +  echo "CONFIG_VHOST_NET=y" >> $config_host_mak
>>> +  if test "$vhost_user" = "yes"; then
>>> +    echo "CONFIG_VHOST_NET_USER=y" >> $config_host_mak
>>> +  fi
>>>  fi
>>>  if test "$vhost_crypto" = "yes" ; then
>>>    echo "CONFIG_VHOST_CRYPTO=y" >> $config_host_mak
>>> @@ -7275,12 +7278,6 @@ if supported_xen_target $target; then
>>>  fi
>>>  if supported_kvm_target $target; then
>>>      echo "CONFIG_KVM=y" >> $config_target_mak
>>> -    if test "$vhost_net" = "yes" ; then
>>> -        echo "CONFIG_VHOST_NET=y" >> $config_target_mak
>>> -        if test "$vhost_user" = "yes" ; then
>>> -            echo "CONFIG_VHOST_USER_NET_TEST_$target_name=y" >> $config_host_mak
>>> -        fi
>>> -    fi
>>>  fi
>>>  if supported_hax_target $target; then
>>>      echo "CONFIG_HAX=y" >> $config_target_mak
>>> diff --git a/include/exec/poison.h b/include/exec/poison.h
>>> index 32d53789f8..b158632791 100644
>>> --- a/include/exec/poison.h
>>> +++ b/include/exec/poison.h
>>> @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@
>>>  #pragma GCC poison CONFIG_XTENSA_DIS
>>>  
>>>  #pragma GCC poison CONFIG_LINUX_USER
>>> -#pragma GCC poison CONFIG_VHOST_NET
>>>  #pragma GCC poison CONFIG_KVM
>>>  #pragma GCC poison CONFIG_SOFTMMU
>>>  
>>> diff --git a/net/net.c b/net/net.c
>>> index 07c194a8f6..95a74add6c 100644
>>> --- a/net/net.c
>>> +++ b/net/net.c
>>> @@ -955,7 +955,7 @@ static int (* const net_client_init_fun[NET_CLIENT_DRIVER__MAX])(
>>>          [NET_CLIENT_DRIVER_BRIDGE]    = net_init_bridge,
>>>  #endif
>>>          [NET_CLIENT_DRIVER_HUBPORT]   = net_init_hubport,
>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_VHOST_NET_USED
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_VHOST_NET_USER
>>>          [NET_CLIENT_DRIVER_VHOST_USER] = net_init_vhost_user,
>>>  #endif
>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_L2TPV3
>>> diff --git a/tests/Makefile.include b/tests/Makefile.include
>>> index fb0b449c02..03a64ce9c8 100644
>>> --- a/tests/Makefile.include
>>> +++ b/tests/Makefile.include
>>> @@ -204,10 +204,7 @@ check-qtest-i386-$(CONFIG_USB_XHCI_NEC) += tests/usb-hcd-xhci-test$(EXESUF)
>>>  check-qtest-i386-y += tests/cpu-plug-test$(EXESUF)
>>>  check-qtest-i386-y += tests/q35-test$(EXESUF)
>>>  check-qtest-i386-y += tests/vmgenid-test$(EXESUF)
>>> -check-qtest-i386-$(CONFIG_VHOST_USER_NET_TEST_i386) += tests/vhost-user-test$(EXESUF)
>>> -ifeq ($(CONFIG_VHOST_USER_NET_TEST_i386),)
>>> -check-qtest-x86_64-$(CONFIG_VHOST_USER_NET_TEST_x86_64) += tests/vhost-user-test$(EXESUF)
>>> -endif
>>> +check-qtest-i386-$(CONFIG_VHOST_NET_USER) += tests/vhost-user-test$(EXESUF)
>>>  check-qtest-i386-$(CONFIG_TPM_CRB) += tests/tpm-crb-swtpm-test$(EXESUF)
>>>  check-qtest-i386-$(CONFIG_TPM_CRB) += tests/tpm-crb-test$(EXESUF)
>>>  check-qtest-i386-$(CONFIG_TPM_TIS) += tests/tpm-tis-swtpm-test$(EXESUF)
>>>
>>
>> FWIW this is unfortunately not that simple.  Patchew will surely notice.
>> :)  I will post v2 when I get reviews for everything else.
> 
> So with the header split this can now go in I guess?
> Want to repost?

Yes.  I'll do it later today after testing.

Paolo