From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: wexu@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: tiwei.bie@intel.com, mst@redhat.com, jfreimann@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 4/8] virtio: get avail bytes check for packed ring
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 11:19:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c52aab11-2e0f-f551-5dfb-75d2931c4769@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1528225683-11413-5-git-send-email-wexu@redhat.com>
On 2018年06月06日 03:07, wexu@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Wei Xu <wexu@redhat.com>
>
> mostly as same as 1.0 except traversing all desc to feed
> headcount, need a refactor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Xu <wexu@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/virtio/virtio.c | 148 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 145 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> index bd669a2..cdbb5af 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> @@ -650,9 +650,9 @@ static int virtqueue_read_next_desc(VirtIODevice *vdev, VRingDesc *desc,
> return VIRTQUEUE_READ_DESC_MORE;
> }
>
> -void virtqueue_get_avail_bytes(VirtQueue *vq, unsigned int *in_bytes,
> - unsigned int *out_bytes,
> - unsigned max_in_bytes, unsigned max_out_bytes)
> +static void virtqueue_split_get_avail_bytes(VirtQueue *vq,
> + unsigned int *in_bytes, unsigned int *out_bytes,
> + unsigned max_in_bytes, unsigned max_out_bytes)
> {
> VirtIODevice *vdev = vq->vdev;
> unsigned int max, idx;
> @@ -775,6 +775,148 @@ err:
> goto done;
> }
>
> +static void virtqueue_packed_get_avail_bytes(VirtQueue *vq,
> + unsigned int *in_bytes, unsigned int *out_bytes,
> + unsigned max_in_bytes, unsigned max_out_bytes)
> +{
> + VirtIODevice *vdev = vq->vdev;
> + unsigned int max, idx;
> + unsigned int total_bufs, in_total, out_total;
> + MemoryRegionCache *desc_cache;
> + VRingMemoryRegionCaches *caches;
> + MemoryRegionCache indirect_desc_cache = MEMORY_REGION_CACHE_INVALID;
> + int64_t len = 0;
> + VRingDescPacked desc;
> +
> + if (unlikely(!vq->vring.desc)) {
> + if (in_bytes) {
> + *in_bytes = 0;
> + }
> + if (out_bytes) {
> + *out_bytes = 0;
> + }
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + idx = vq->last_avail_idx;
> + total_bufs = in_total = out_total = 0;
> +
> + max = vq->vring.num;
> + caches = vring_get_region_caches(vq);
> + if (caches->desc.len < max * sizeof(VRingDescPacked)) {
> + virtio_error(vdev, "Cannot map descriptor ring");
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + desc_cache = &caches->desc;
> + vring_packed_desc_read(vdev, &desc, desc_cache, idx);
> + while (is_desc_avail(&desc)) {
So you did vring_packed_desc_read() like:
static void vring_packed_desc_read(VirtIODevice *vdev, VRingDescPacked
*desc,
MemoryRegionCache *cache, int i)
{
address_space_read_cached(cache, i * sizeof(VRingDescPacked),
desc, sizeof(VRingDescPacked));
virtio_tswap64s(vdev, &desc->addr);
virtio_tswap32s(vdev, &desc->len);
virtio_tswap16s(vdev, &desc->id);
virtio_tswap16s(vdev, &desc->flags);
}
How do you guarantee desc->flags was read before all other fields?
> + unsigned int num_bufs;
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + num_bufs = total_bufs;
> +
> + if (desc.flags & VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT) {
> + if (desc.len % sizeof(VRingDescPacked)) {
> + virtio_error(vdev, "Invalid size for indirect buffer table");
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + /* If we've got too many, that implies a descriptor loop. */
> + if (num_bufs >= max) {
> + virtio_error(vdev, "Looped descriptor");
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + /* loop over the indirect descriptor table */
> + len = address_space_cache_init(&indirect_desc_cache,
> + vdev->dma_as,
> + desc.addr, desc.len, false);
> + desc_cache = &indirect_desc_cache;
> + if (len < desc.len) {
> + virtio_error(vdev, "Cannot map indirect buffer");
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + max = desc.len / sizeof(VRingDescPacked);
> + num_bufs = i = 0;
> + vring_packed_desc_read(vdev, &desc, desc_cache, i);
> + }
> +
> + do {
> + /* If we've got too many, that implies a descriptor loop. */
> + if (++num_bufs > max) {
> + virtio_error(vdev, "Looped descriptor");
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + if (desc.flags & VRING_DESC_F_WRITE) {
> + in_total += desc.len;
> + } else {
> + out_total += desc.len;
> + }
> + if (in_total >= max_in_bytes && out_total >= max_out_bytes) {
> + goto done;
> + }
> +
> + if (desc_cache == &indirect_desc_cache) {
> + if (++i >= vq->vring.num) {
> + i -= vq->vring.num;
> + }
> + vring_packed_desc_read(vdev, &desc, desc_cache, i);
> + } else {
> + if (++idx >= vq->vring.num) {
> + idx -= vq->vring.num;
> + }
> + vring_packed_desc_read(vdev, &desc, desc_cache, idx);
> + }
Ok, so the difference is the index, can we use a single index instead of
two (i, idx) here?
> + /* Make sure we see the flags */
> + smp_mb();
Why need this?
Thanks
> + } while (desc.flags & VRING_DESC_F_NEXT);
> +
> + if (desc_cache == &indirect_desc_cache) {
> + address_space_cache_destroy(&indirect_desc_cache);
> + total_bufs++;
> + /* We missed one step on for indirect desc */
> + idx++;
> + } else {
> + total_bufs = num_bufs;
> + }
> +
> + desc_cache = &caches->desc;
> + vring_packed_desc_read(vdev, &desc, desc_cache, idx % vq->vring.num);
> + }
> +
> +done:
> + address_space_cache_destroy(&indirect_desc_cache);
> + if (in_bytes) {
> + *in_bytes = in_total;
> + }
> + if (out_bytes) {
> + *out_bytes = out_total;
> + }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + return;
> +
> +err:
> + in_total = out_total = 0;
> + goto done;
> +}
> +
> +void virtqueue_get_avail_bytes(VirtQueue *vq, unsigned int *in_bytes,
> + unsigned int *out_bytes,
> + unsigned max_in_bytes, unsigned max_out_bytes)
> +{
> + if (virtio_vdev_has_feature(vq->vdev, VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED)) {
> + virtqueue_packed_get_avail_bytes(vq, in_bytes, out_bytes,
> + max_in_bytes, max_out_bytes);
> + } else {
> + virtqueue_split_get_avail_bytes(vq, in_bytes, out_bytes,
> + max_in_bytes, max_out_bytes);
> + }
> +}
> +
> int virtqueue_avail_bytes(VirtQueue *vq, unsigned int in_bytes,
> unsigned int out_bytes)
> {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-06 3:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-05 19:07 [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 0/8] packed ring virtio-net userspace backend support wexu
2018-06-05 19:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 1/8] virtio: feature bit, data structure, init for 1.1 wexu
2018-06-06 2:49 ` Jason Wang
2018-06-05 19:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 2/8] virtio: memory cache for packed ring wexu
2018-06-06 2:53 ` Jason Wang
2018-06-19 7:39 ` Wei Xu
2018-06-13 12:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-06-05 19:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 3/8] virtio: empty check and desc read " wexu
2018-06-06 3:09 ` Jason Wang
2018-06-05 19:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 4/8] virtio: get avail bytes check " wexu
2018-06-06 3:19 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2018-06-05 19:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 5/8] virtio: queue pop " wexu
2018-06-06 3:29 ` Jason Wang
2018-06-06 3:38 ` Wei Xu
2018-06-06 3:41 ` Jason Wang
2018-06-19 7:58 ` Wei Xu
2018-06-05 19:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 6/8] virtio: flush/push " wexu
2018-06-06 3:39 ` Jason Wang
[not found] ` <7dc2af60-47ad-1250-fc6c-3fdf288654c3@redhat.com>
2018-11-28 17:33 ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-06-05 19:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 7/8] virtio: event suppression " wexu
2018-06-06 3:46 ` Jason Wang
2018-06-05 19:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 8/8] virtio: guest driver reload for vhost-net wexu
2018-06-06 3:48 ` Jason Wang
2018-06-19 7:53 ` Wei Xu
2018-06-06 2:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 0/8] packed ring virtio-net userspace backend support Jason Wang
2018-06-06 3:49 ` Jason Wang
2018-06-19 7:41 ` Wei Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c52aab11-2e0f-f551-5dfb-75d2931c4769@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jfreimann@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
--cc=wexu@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).