qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: wexu@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: tiwei.bie@intel.com, mst@redhat.com, jfreimann@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 4/8] virtio: get avail bytes check for packed ring
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 11:19:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c52aab11-2e0f-f551-5dfb-75d2931c4769@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1528225683-11413-5-git-send-email-wexu@redhat.com>



On 2018年06月06日 03:07, wexu@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Wei Xu <wexu@redhat.com>
>
> mostly as same as 1.0 except traversing all desc to feed
> headcount, need a refactor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Xu <wexu@redhat.com>
> ---
>   hw/virtio/virtio.c | 148 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>   1 file changed, 145 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> index bd669a2..cdbb5af 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> @@ -650,9 +650,9 @@ static int virtqueue_read_next_desc(VirtIODevice *vdev, VRingDesc *desc,
>       return VIRTQUEUE_READ_DESC_MORE;
>   }
>   
> -void virtqueue_get_avail_bytes(VirtQueue *vq, unsigned int *in_bytes,
> -                               unsigned int *out_bytes,
> -                               unsigned max_in_bytes, unsigned max_out_bytes)
> +static void virtqueue_split_get_avail_bytes(VirtQueue *vq,
> +                            unsigned int *in_bytes, unsigned int *out_bytes,
> +                            unsigned max_in_bytes, unsigned max_out_bytes)
>   {
>       VirtIODevice *vdev = vq->vdev;
>       unsigned int max, idx;
> @@ -775,6 +775,148 @@ err:
>       goto done;
>   }
>   
> +static void virtqueue_packed_get_avail_bytes(VirtQueue *vq,
> +                            unsigned int *in_bytes, unsigned int *out_bytes,
> +                            unsigned max_in_bytes, unsigned max_out_bytes)
> +{
> +    VirtIODevice *vdev = vq->vdev;
> +    unsigned int max, idx;
> +    unsigned int total_bufs, in_total, out_total;
> +    MemoryRegionCache *desc_cache;
> +    VRingMemoryRegionCaches *caches;
> +    MemoryRegionCache indirect_desc_cache = MEMORY_REGION_CACHE_INVALID;
> +    int64_t len = 0;
> +    VRingDescPacked desc;
> +
> +    if (unlikely(!vq->vring.desc)) {
> +        if (in_bytes) {
> +            *in_bytes = 0;
> +        }
> +        if (out_bytes) {
> +            *out_bytes = 0;
> +        }
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    rcu_read_lock();
> +    idx = vq->last_avail_idx;
> +    total_bufs = in_total = out_total = 0;
> +
> +    max = vq->vring.num;
> +    caches = vring_get_region_caches(vq);
> +    if (caches->desc.len < max * sizeof(VRingDescPacked)) {
> +        virtio_error(vdev, "Cannot map descriptor ring");
> +        goto err;
> +    }
> +
> +    desc_cache = &caches->desc;
> +    vring_packed_desc_read(vdev, &desc, desc_cache, idx);
> +    while (is_desc_avail(&desc)) {

So you did vring_packed_desc_read() like:

static void vring_packed_desc_read(VirtIODevice *vdev, VRingDescPacked 
*desc,
                             MemoryRegionCache *cache, int i)
{
     address_space_read_cached(cache, i * sizeof(VRingDescPacked),
                               desc, sizeof(VRingDescPacked));
     virtio_tswap64s(vdev, &desc->addr);
     virtio_tswap32s(vdev, &desc->len);
     virtio_tswap16s(vdev, &desc->id);
     virtio_tswap16s(vdev, &desc->flags);
}

How do you guarantee desc->flags was read before all other fields?

> +        unsigned int num_bufs;
> +        unsigned int i;
> +
> +        num_bufs = total_bufs;
> +
> +        if (desc.flags & VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT) {
> +            if (desc.len % sizeof(VRingDescPacked)) {
> +                virtio_error(vdev, "Invalid size for indirect buffer table");
> +                goto err;
> +            }
> +
> +            /* If we've got too many, that implies a descriptor loop. */
> +            if (num_bufs >= max) {
> +                virtio_error(vdev, "Looped descriptor");
> +                goto err;
> +            }
> +
> +            /* loop over the indirect descriptor table */
> +            len = address_space_cache_init(&indirect_desc_cache,
> +                                           vdev->dma_as,
> +                                           desc.addr, desc.len, false);
> +            desc_cache = &indirect_desc_cache;
> +            if (len < desc.len) {
> +                virtio_error(vdev, "Cannot map indirect buffer");
> +                goto err;
> +            }
> +
> +            max = desc.len / sizeof(VRingDescPacked);
> +            num_bufs = i = 0;
> +            vring_packed_desc_read(vdev, &desc, desc_cache, i);
> +        }
> +
> +        do {
> +            /* If we've got too many, that implies a descriptor loop. */
> +            if (++num_bufs > max) {
> +                virtio_error(vdev, "Looped descriptor");
> +                goto err;
> +            }
> +
> +            if (desc.flags & VRING_DESC_F_WRITE) {
> +                in_total += desc.len;
> +            } else {
> +                out_total += desc.len;
> +            }
> +            if (in_total >= max_in_bytes && out_total >= max_out_bytes) {
> +                goto done;
> +            }
> +
> +            if (desc_cache == &indirect_desc_cache) {
> +                if (++i >= vq->vring.num) {
> +                    i -= vq->vring.num;
> +                }
> +                vring_packed_desc_read(vdev, &desc, desc_cache, i);
> +            } else {
> +                if (++idx >= vq->vring.num) {
> +                    idx -= vq->vring.num;
> +                }
> +                vring_packed_desc_read(vdev, &desc, desc_cache, idx);
> +            }

Ok, so the difference is the index, can we use a single index instead of 
two (i, idx) here?

> +            /* Make sure we see the flags */
> +            smp_mb();

Why need this?

Thanks

> +        } while (desc.flags & VRING_DESC_F_NEXT);
> +
> +        if (desc_cache == &indirect_desc_cache) {
> +            address_space_cache_destroy(&indirect_desc_cache);
> +            total_bufs++;
> +            /* We missed one step on for indirect desc */
> +            idx++;
> +        } else {
> +            total_bufs = num_bufs;
> +        }
> +
> +        desc_cache = &caches->desc;
> +        vring_packed_desc_read(vdev, &desc, desc_cache, idx % vq->vring.num);
> +    }
> +
> +done:
> +    address_space_cache_destroy(&indirect_desc_cache);
> +    if (in_bytes) {
> +        *in_bytes = in_total;
> +    }
> +    if (out_bytes) {
> +        *out_bytes = out_total;
> +    }
> +    rcu_read_unlock();
> +    return;
> +
> +err:
> +    in_total = out_total = 0;
> +    goto done;
> +}
> +
> +void virtqueue_get_avail_bytes(VirtQueue *vq, unsigned int *in_bytes,
> +                               unsigned int *out_bytes,
> +                               unsigned max_in_bytes, unsigned max_out_bytes)
> +{
> +    if (virtio_vdev_has_feature(vq->vdev, VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED)) {
> +        virtqueue_packed_get_avail_bytes(vq, in_bytes, out_bytes,
> +                                         max_in_bytes, max_out_bytes);
> +    } else {
> +        virtqueue_split_get_avail_bytes(vq, in_bytes, out_bytes,
> +                                        max_in_bytes, max_out_bytes);
> +    }
> +}
> +
>   int virtqueue_avail_bytes(VirtQueue *vq, unsigned int in_bytes,
>                             unsigned int out_bytes)
>   {

  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-06  3:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-05 19:07 [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 0/8] packed ring virtio-net userspace backend support wexu
2018-06-05 19:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 1/8] virtio: feature bit, data structure, init for 1.1 wexu
2018-06-06  2:49   ` Jason Wang
2018-06-05 19:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 2/8] virtio: memory cache for packed ring wexu
2018-06-06  2:53   ` Jason Wang
2018-06-19  7:39     ` Wei Xu
2018-06-13 12:27   ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-06-05 19:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 3/8] virtio: empty check and desc read " wexu
2018-06-06  3:09   ` Jason Wang
2018-06-05 19:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 4/8] virtio: get avail bytes check " wexu
2018-06-06  3:19   ` Jason Wang [this message]
2018-06-05 19:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 5/8] virtio: queue pop " wexu
2018-06-06  3:29   ` Jason Wang
2018-06-06  3:38     ` Wei Xu
2018-06-06  3:41       ` Jason Wang
2018-06-19  7:58         ` Wei Xu
2018-06-05 19:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 6/8] virtio: flush/push " wexu
2018-06-06  3:39   ` Jason Wang
     [not found]   ` <7dc2af60-47ad-1250-fc6c-3fdf288654c3@redhat.com>
2018-11-28 17:33     ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-06-05 19:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 7/8] virtio: event suppression " wexu
2018-06-06  3:46   ` Jason Wang
2018-06-05 19:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 8/8] virtio: guest driver reload for vhost-net wexu
2018-06-06  3:48   ` Jason Wang
2018-06-19  7:53     ` Wei Xu
2018-06-06  2:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 0/8] packed ring virtio-net userspace backend support Jason Wang
2018-06-06  3:49 ` Jason Wang
2018-06-19  7:41   ` Wei Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c52aab11-2e0f-f551-5dfb-75d2931c4769@redhat.com \
    --to=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=jfreimann@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
    --cc=wexu@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).