From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com, walling@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] s390-ccw: Fix alignment for CCW1
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 15:24:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c61c8ee1-3bca-41db-33a7-b65186a80d25@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c7e3a1cb-10e6-4c2d-0225-2bcbe9c97de6@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 08/28/2017 03:18 PM, Farhan Ali wrote:
>
>
> On 08/28/2017 09:06 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>> On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 08:56:42 -0400
>> Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/28/2017 04:22 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 11:05:30 -0400
>>>> Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 08/25/2017 10:04 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 09:24:46 -0400
>>>>>> Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The commit 198c0d1f9df8c4 s390x/css: check ccw address validity
>>>>>>> exposes an alignment issue in ccw bios.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> According to PoP the CCW must be doubleword aligned. Let's fix
>>>>>>> this in the bios.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>>>> Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> pc-bios/s390-ccw/cio.h | 2 +-
>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/cio.h b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/cio.h
>>>>>>> index f5b4549..55eaeee 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/cio.h
>>>>>>> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/cio.h
>>>>>>> @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ struct ccw1 {
>>>>>>> __u8 flags;
>>>>>>> __u16 count;
>>>>>>> __u32 cda;
>>>>>>> -} __attribute__ ((packed));
>>>>>>> +} __attribute__ ((packed, aligned(8)));
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> #define CCW_FLAG_DC 0x80
>>>>>>> #define CCW_FLAG_CC 0x40
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Currently testing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This looks obviously right, but did you figure out what the (probably
>>>>>> unrelated) other failure was?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That is still under investigation, for some reason it only fails for an
>>>>> LDL DASD and it works for SCSIs and CDL DASD.
>>>>
>>>> Which are the symptoms of the failure? I'd like to understand this
>>>> before I update the (currently working by accident) bios with an
>>>> updated version.
>>>>
>>>> I'll just apply the patch for now.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Well it's seems like the failure for LDL DASD could be a disk setup
>>> failure. We tried the test on a different environment with LDL disks and
>>> everything worked fine with the patch applied.
>>
>> Odd that it breaks after this change, though. Do you get command
>> rejects, or what happens?
>>
>
> It's the alignment of the CCW which causes the problem.
>
> The exact error message when starting the guest was:
>
> ! No virtio device found !
>
> Since it worked for SCSI and CDL, and failed for LDL disks on that particular system, we are not really sure what caused the failure.
> Debugging it further showed the CCW for LDL disks were not aligned at double word boundary.
>
> Trying the test on a different system with LDL disks worked fine, with the aligned(8) fix.
Do you happen to have an old s390-ccw.img laying around in the test folder? QEMU might pick up
this one (e.g. when calling it without libvirt from the command line).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-28 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1503667215.git.alifm@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2017-08-25 13:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] s390-ccw: Fix alignment for CCW1 Farhan Ali
2017-08-25 13:55 ` no-reply
2017-08-25 14:04 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-25 15:05 ` Farhan Ali
2017-08-28 8:22 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-28 12:56 ` Farhan Ali
2017-08-28 13:06 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-28 13:18 ` Farhan Ali
2017-08-28 13:24 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2017-08-28 13:52 ` Farhan Ali
2017-08-28 14:05 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-28 14:15 ` Farhan Ali
2017-08-28 14:19 ` Halil Pasic
2017-08-28 14:28 ` Farhan Ali
2017-08-29 12:04 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-29 12:39 ` Farhan Ali
2017-08-29 12:45 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-29 18:45 ` Eric Farman
2017-08-30 7:27 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-28 15:04 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2017-08-28 18:47 ` Farhan Ali
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c61c8ee1-3bca-41db-33a7-b65186a80d25@de.ibm.com \
--to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=alifm@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=walling@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).