From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5CE0C433DB for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 01:31:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2959C2080D for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 01:31:02 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2959C2080D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=nongnu.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:36630 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kwEi5-0005J4-PM for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2021 20:31:01 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46740) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kwEg4-0004m7-RY; Sun, 03 Jan 2021 20:28:56 -0500 Received: from zero.eik.bme.hu ([152.66.115.2]:41597) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kwEg3-0008VL-9f; Sun, 03 Jan 2021 20:28:56 -0500 Received: from zero.eik.bme.hu (blah.eik.bme.hu [152.66.115.182]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 676F87470DD; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 02:28:53 +0100 (CET) Received: by zero.eik.bme.hu (Postfix, from userid 432) id 3B9E074645F; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 02:28:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zero.eik.bme.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39F1274645B; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 02:28:53 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 02:28:53 +0100 (CET) To: David Gibson Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Misc sam460ex fixes (was: Clean up sam460ex irq mapping) In-Reply-To: <20210104010532.GB1915@yekko.fritz.box> Message-ID: References: <20210104010532.GB1915@yekko.fritz.box> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Received-SPF: pass client-ip=152.66.115.2; envelope-from=balaton@eik.bme.hu; helo=zero.eik.bme.hu X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Guenter Roeck , f4bug@amsat.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Reply-to: BALATON Zoltan From: BALATON Zoltan via On Mon, 4 Jan 2021, David Gibson wrote: > On Sun, Jan 03, 2021 at 02:09:33AM +0100, BALATON Zoltan via wrote: >> So this is v3 of a series that started to fix a potential problem with >> irq mapping in pci440_pcix (used by sam460ex) that got some other >> fixes along the way as by-products. But it turns out the irq issue >> this was trying to fix is not really a problem so finally we just >> update the comment for now documenting why it works and only the >> by-products remain in this series. Of which there are two more in this >> v3 finally fixing a long standing problem booting MorphOS on sam460ex >> (which I've got after debugging similar problem with pegasos2/vt8231 >> that gave me an idea how to debug this.) > > Applied to ppc-for-6.0. > > So.. you're pretty much the only person who's shown any interest in > the embedded ppc stuff in qemu for a pretty long time. Any chance I > could convince you to be ppc4xx submaintainer? Not if it involves testing or sending pull requests because I don't have time for that. I'm already listed as maintainer for stuff I contributed and try to review and test changes to that (i.e. sam460ex) but I'm afraid that's all I can do. Regards, BALATON Zoltan