qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>, Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	stefanha@redhat.com, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Regression from 2.8: stuck in bdrv_drain()
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 13:45:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c74d2b7d-d185-53ba-9bf9-8cf976d8f684@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170413011109.GC15762@localhost.localdomain>



On 13/04/2017 09:11, Jeff Cody wrote:
>> It didn't make it into 2.9-rc4 because of limited time. :(
>>
>> Looks like there is no -rc5, we'll have to document this as a known issue.
>> Users should "block-job-complete/cancel" as soon as possible to avoid such a
>> hang.
>
> I'd argue for including a fix for 2.9, since this is both a regression, and
> a hard lock without possible recovery short of restarting the QEMU process.

It is a bit of a corner case (and jobs on I/O thread are relatively rare
too), so maybe it's not worth delaying 2.9.  It has been delayed already
quite a bit.  Another reason I think I prefer to wait is to ensure that
we have an entry in qemu-iotests to avoid the future regression.

Fam explained to me what happens, and the root cause is that bdrv_drain
never does a release/acquire pair in this case, so the I/O thread run
remains stuck in a callback that tries to acquire.  Ironically
reintroducing RFifoLock would probably fix this (not 100% sure).  Oops.

His solution is a bit hacky, but we will hopefully be able to revert it
in 2.10 or whenever aio_context_acquire/release will go away.

Thanks,

Paolo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-13  5:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-12 20:46 [Qemu-devel] Regression from 2.8: stuck in bdrv_drain() Jeff Cody
2017-04-12 21:38 ` John Snow
2017-04-12 22:22   ` Jeff Cody
2017-04-12 23:54     ` Fam Zheng
2017-04-13  1:11       ` Jeff Cody
2017-04-13  1:57         ` Jeff Cody
2017-04-13  5:45         ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2017-04-13 14:39           ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-04-13 14:45             ` Eric Blake
2017-04-13 14:50               ` Jeff Cody
2017-04-13 15:02             ` Jeff Cody
2017-04-13 17:03               ` John Snow
2017-04-13 15:29           ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-04-13  9:48       ` [Qemu-devel] " Peter Maydell
2017-04-13 14:33         ` Eric Blake
2017-04-13 14:53           ` Peter Maydell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c74d2b7d-d185-53ba-9bf9-8cf976d8f684@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=famz@redhat.com \
    --cc=jcody@redhat.com \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).