From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Roman Kagan <rvkagan@yandex-team.ru>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: make BlockConf.*_size properties 32-bit
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 15:44:19 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c79721ac-357f-6b9f-6d71-53f2cb72ef6e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200211115401.43230-1-rvkagan@yandex-team.ru>
On 2/11/20 5:54 AM, Roman Kagan wrote:
> Devices (virtio-blk, scsi, etc.) and the block layer are happy to use
> 32-bit for logical_block_size, physical_block_size, and min_io_size.
> However, the properties in BlockConf are defined as uint16_t limiting
> the values to 32768.
>
> This appears unnecessary tight, and we've seen bigger block sizes handy
> at times.
What larger sizes? I could see 64k or maybe even 1M block sizes,...
>
> Make them 32 bit instead and lift the limitation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roman Kagan <rvkagan@yandex-team.ru>
> ---
> hw/core/qdev-properties.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
> include/hw/block/block.h | 8 ++++----
> include/hw/qdev-properties.h | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/core/qdev-properties.c b/hw/core/qdev-properties.c
> index 7f93bfeb88..5f84e4a3b8 100644
> --- a/hw/core/qdev-properties.c
> +++ b/hw/core/qdev-properties.c
> @@ -716,30 +716,32 @@ const PropertyInfo qdev_prop_pci_devfn = {
>
> /* --- blocksize --- */
>
> +#define MIN_BLOCK_SIZE 512
> +#define MAX_BLOCK_SIZE 2147483648
...but 2G block sizes are going to have tremendous performance problems.
I'm not necessarily opposed to the widening to a 32-bit type, but think
you need more justification or a smaller number for the max block size,
particularly since qcow2 refuses to use cluster sizes larger than 2M and
it makes no sense to allow a block size larger than a cluster size.
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-12 21:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-11 11:54 [PATCH] block: make BlockConf.*_size properties 32-bit Roman Kagan
2020-02-12 21:44 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2020-02-13 8:01 ` Roman Kagan
2020-02-13 12:47 ` Eric Blake
2020-02-13 13:55 ` Roman Kagan
2020-03-02 10:55 ` Roman Kagan
2020-03-24 8:55 ` Roman Kagan
2020-03-24 9:21 ` Kevin Wolf
2020-03-24 14:27 ` Eric Blake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c79721ac-357f-6b9f-6d71-53f2cb72ef6e@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rvkagan@yandex-team.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).