qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: borntraeger@de.ibm.com, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, cohuck@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/18] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 15:24:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c83b417c-158e-da67-5ed1-24e788f78314@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5afa8775-5382-f128-7bfd-39643a02c454@redhat.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2619 bytes --]

On 3/5/20 3:23 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 05.03.20 15:20, Janosch Frank wrote:
>> On 3/5/20 3:15 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> +static void s390_machine_unprotect(S390CcwMachineState *ms)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> +    CPUState *t;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +    if (!ms->pv)
>>>>>> +        return;
>>>>>
>>>>> How can this ever happen? g_assert(ms->pv) ?
>>>>
>>>> Currently not, that's only used in the follow up patches with the ballon
>>>> and migration blocker
>>>
>>> Even then, why should we unprotect when not protected. That looks wrong
>>> to me and has to be fixed in the other patches,
>>
>> I fixed it this morning :)
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, i don't see this function getting called from anywhere else except
>>>>> when s390_machine_protect() fails. That looks wrong. This has to be
>>>>> called when going out of PV mode.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, but that's in the diag308 1-4 patch.
>>>
>>> The way patches were split up is somewhat sub-optimal for review.
>>
>> Thanks
>> I'll try to find a better split up of the code
>>
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>>> +        break;
>>>>>> +    case S390_RESET_PV: /* Subcode 10 */
>>>>>> +        subsystem_reset();
>>>>>> +        s390_crypto_reset();
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +        CPU_FOREACH(t) {
>>>>>> +            if (t == cs) {
>>>>>> +                continue;
>>>>>> +            }
>>>>>> +            run_on_cpu(t, s390_do_cpu_full_reset, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL);
>>>>>> +        }
>>>>>> +        run_on_cpu(cs, s390_do_cpu_reset, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +        if (s390_machine_protect(ms)) {
>>>>>> +            s390_machine_inject_pv_error(cs);
>>>>>
>>>>> Ah, so it's not an actual exception. BUT: All other guest cpus were
>>>>> reset, can the guest deal with that?
>>>>
>>>> Well, all other CPUs should be stopped for diag308, no?
>>>> Also it's done by the bootloader and not a OS which just stops its cpus
>>>> and goes into protected mode.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> (run_on_cpu(cs, s390_do_cpu_reset, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL) should go after the
>>>>> s390_machine_protect() I assume - the change you had in the other patch)
>>>>
>>>> That's not a good idea, I want to reset before we automatically call the
>>>> UV routines on a reset.
>>>
>>> But how can s390_machine_inject_pv_error(cs) be any effective if you
>>> already reset the CPU?
>>>
>>
>> Because a normal cpu reset does not clear out the registers.
> 
> Okay, so a guest (e.g., Linux) can deal with some other things getting
> reset I assume?

At this point in time only the bootloader runs, which survives a normal
reset.



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-05 14:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-04 11:42 [PATCH v6 00/18] s390x: Protected Virtualization support Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 01/18] Sync pv Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 02/18] s390x: protvirt: Add diag308 subcodes 8 - 10 Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 17:04   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-05 12:04     ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-05 12:24       ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-05 12:30         ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-04 17:04   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-04 17:06   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-06  9:59     ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 18:59   ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-05 14:39     ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 03/18] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility Janosch Frank
2020-03-05 13:51   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-05 14:10     ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-05 14:15       ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-05 14:20         ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-05 14:23           ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-05 14:24             ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2020-03-05 13:52   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-05 14:15     ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-06 11:48   ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-06 13:36     ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 04/18] s390x: protvirt: Add migration blocker Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 17:13   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-05  9:16     ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-05  9:30       ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-04 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 05/18] s390x: protvirt: Handle diag 308 subcodes 0,1,3,4 Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 06/18] s390x: protvirt: Inhibit balloon when switching to protected mode Janosch Frank
2020-03-05 12:00   ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-04 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 07/18] s390x: protvirt: KVM intercept changes Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 08/18] s390x: Add SIDA memory ops Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 17:39   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-05  9:23     ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 09/18] s390x: protvirt: Move STSI data over SIDAD Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 17:43   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-05  9:27     ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 10/18] s390x: protvirt: SCLP interpretation Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 17:48   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-05  9:34     ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-05 10:09       ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-04 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 11/18] s390x: protvirt: Set guest IPL PSW Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 17:51   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-04 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 12/18] s390x: protvirt: Move diag 308 data over SIDAD Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 17:54   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-04 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 13/18] s390x: protvirt: Disable address checks for PV guest IO emulation Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 17:55   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-05  9:42     ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-05 10:00       ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-05 11:26         ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-05 11:37           ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-04 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 14/18] s390x: protvirt: Move IO control structures over SIDA Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 18:56   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-05  9:55     ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-05 10:01       ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-04 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 15/18] s390x: protvirt: Handle SIGP store status correctly Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 18:41   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-05  9:59     ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 16/18] s390x: Add unpack facility feature to GA1 Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 18:42   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-06 10:14   ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-06 10:22     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-04 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 17/18] docs: Add protvirt docs Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 19:09   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-09  9:51     ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 18/18] pc-bios: s390x: Save iplb location in lowcore Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 12:40   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-04 13:25   ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-04 13:37     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-05 17:04   ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-04 17:15 ` [PATCH v6 00/18] s390x: Protected Virtualization support David Hildenbrand
2020-03-04 17:45   ` Christian Borntraeger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c83b417c-158e-da67-5ed1-24e788f78314@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).