From: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
To: "Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas@t-8ch.de>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] linux-user: Don't require PROT_READ for mincore
Date: Mon, 1 May 2023 17:48:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c847739a-6a9a-82ea-93c8-c77d09f21953@vivier.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230422100314.1650-3-thomas@t-8ch.de>
Le 22/04/2023 à 12:03, Thomas Weißschuh a écrit :
> The kernel does not require PROT_READ for addresses passed to mincore.
> For example the fincore(1) tool from util-linux uses PROT_NONE and
> currently does not work under qemu-user.
>
> Example (with fincore(1) from util-linux 2.38):
>
> $ fincore /proc/self/exe
> RES PAGES SIZE FILE
> 24K 6 22.1K /proc/self/exe
>
> $ qemu-x86_64 /usr/bin/fincore /proc/self/exe
> fincore: failed to do mincore: /proc/self/exe: Cannot allocate memory
>
> With this patch:
>
> $ ./build/qemu-x86_64 /usr/bin/fincore /proc/self/exe
> RES PAGES SIZE FILE
> 24K 6 22.1K /proc/self/exe
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@t-8ch.de>
> ---
> linux-user/syscall.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/linux-user/syscall.c b/linux-user/syscall.c
> index 69f740ff98c8..5ec848b459f7 100644
> --- a/linux-user/syscall.c
> +++ b/linux-user/syscall.c
> @@ -11897,7 +11897,7 @@ static abi_long do_syscall1(CPUArchState *cpu_env, int num, abi_long arg1,
> #ifdef TARGET_NR_mincore
> case TARGET_NR_mincore:
> {
> - void *a = lock_user(VERIFY_READ, arg1, arg2, 0);
> + void *a = lock_user(VERIFY_NONE, arg1, arg2, 0);
> if (!a) {
> return -TARGET_ENOMEM;
> }
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-01 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-22 10:03 [PATCH v2 0/2] linux-user: Fix mincore() with PROT_NONE Thomas Weißschuh
2023-04-22 10:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] linux-user: Add new flag VERIFY_NONE Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-01 15:48 ` Laurent Vivier
2023-05-01 15:54 ` Laurent Vivier
2023-04-22 10:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] linux-user: Don't require PROT_READ for mincore Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-01 15:48 ` Laurent Vivier [this message]
2023-05-01 15:54 ` Laurent Vivier
2023-04-23 17:24 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] linux-user: Fix mincore() with PROT_NONE Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c847739a-6a9a-82ea-93c8-c77d09f21953@vivier.eu \
--to=laurent@vivier.eu \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thomas@t-8ch.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).