From: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, "David Gibson" <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Alexey Kardashevskiy" <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
"Cédric Le Goater" <clg@kaod.org>, "Greg Kurz" <groug@kaod.org>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-for-8.0 4/4] hw/ppc/spapr_ovec: Avoid target_ulong spapr_ovec_parse_vector()
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 13:47:12 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c871b044-4241-2f02-ebd6-6b797663a140@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221213123550.39302-5-philmd@linaro.org>
On 12/13/22 09:35, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> spapr_ovec.c is a device, but it uses target_ulong which is
> target specific. The hwaddr type (declared in "exec/hwaddr.h")
> better fits hardware addresses.
As said by Harsh, spapr_ovec is in fact a data structure that stores platform
options that are supported by the guest.
That doesn't mean that I oppose the change made here. Aside from semantics - which
I also don't have a strong opinion about it - I don't believe it matters that
much - spapr is 64 bit only, so hwaddr will always be == target_ulong.
Cedric/David/Greg, let me know if you have any restriction/thoughts about this.
I'm inclined to accept it as is.
Daniel
>
> Change spapr_ovec_parse_vector() to take a hwaddr argument,
> allowing the removal of "cpu.h" in a device header.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
> ---
> hw/ppc/spapr_ovec.c | 3 ++-
> include/hw/ppc/spapr_ovec.h | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_ovec.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_ovec.c
> index b2567caa5c..a18a751b57 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_ovec.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_ovec.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> #include "qemu/error-report.h"
> #include "trace.h"
> #include <libfdt.h>
> +#include "cpu.h"
>
> #define OV_MAXBYTES 256 /* not including length byte */
> #define OV_MAXBITS (OV_MAXBYTES * BITS_PER_BYTE)
> @@ -176,7 +177,7 @@ static target_ulong vector_addr(target_ulong table_addr, int vector)
> return table_addr;
> }
>
> -SpaprOptionVector *spapr_ovec_parse_vector(target_ulong table_addr, int vector)
> +SpaprOptionVector *spapr_ovec_parse_vector(hwaddr table_addr, int vector)
> {
> SpaprOptionVector *ov;
> target_ulong addr;
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_ovec.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_ovec.h
> index c3e8b98e7e..d756b916e4 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_ovec.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_ovec.h
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
> #ifndef SPAPR_OVEC_H
> #define SPAPR_OVEC_H
>
> -#include "cpu.h"
> +#include "exec/hwaddr.h"
>
> typedef struct SpaprOptionVector SpaprOptionVector;
>
> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ void spapr_ovec_set(SpaprOptionVector *ov, long bitnr);
> void spapr_ovec_clear(SpaprOptionVector *ov, long bitnr);
> bool spapr_ovec_test(SpaprOptionVector *ov, long bitnr);
> bool spapr_ovec_empty(SpaprOptionVector *ov);
> -SpaprOptionVector *spapr_ovec_parse_vector(target_ulong table_addr, int vector);
> +SpaprOptionVector *spapr_ovec_parse_vector(hwaddr table_addr, int vector);
> int spapr_dt_ovec(void *fdt, int fdt_offset,
> SpaprOptionVector *ov, const char *name);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-16 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-13 12:35 [PATCH-for-8.0 0/4] ppc: Clean up few headers to make them target agnostic Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2022-12-13 12:35 ` [PATCH-for-8.0 1/4] target/ppc/kvm: Add missing "cpu.h" and "exec/hwaddr.h" Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2022-12-16 16:33 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2022-12-13 12:35 ` [PATCH-for-8.0 2/4] hw/ppc/vof: Do not include the full "cpu.h" Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2022-12-16 16:33 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2022-12-13 12:35 ` [PATCH-for-8.0 3/4] hw/ppc/spapr: Reduce "vof.h" inclusion Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2022-12-16 16:34 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2022-12-13 12:35 ` [PATCH-for-8.0 4/4] hw/ppc/spapr_ovec: Avoid target_ulong spapr_ovec_parse_vector() Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2022-12-13 16:40 ` Harsh Prateek Bora
2022-12-16 16:47 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza [this message]
2022-12-21 9:46 ` Cédric Le Goater
2022-12-21 13:26 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2022-12-22 1:57 ` David Gibson
2022-12-16 16:54 ` [PATCH-for-8.0 0/4] ppc: Clean up few headers to make them target agnostic Daniel Henrique Barboza
2022-12-16 20:32 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c871b044-4241-2f02-ebd6-6b797663a140@gmail.com \
--to=danielhb413@gmail.com \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=clg@kaod.org \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).