From: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
To: "Zhao Liu" <zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Marcelo Tosatti" <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com>,
Zhuocheng Ding <zhuocheng.ding@intel.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
Yongwei Ma <yongwei.ma@intel.com>, Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>,
Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 06/21] i386/cpu: Use APIC ID info to encode cache topo in CPUID[4]
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2024 21:39:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c88ee253-f212-4aa7-9db9-e90a99a9a1e3@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240227103231.1556302-7-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com>
On 2/27/2024 6:32 PM, Zhao Liu wrote:
> From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
>
> Refer to the fixes of cache_info_passthrough ([1], [2]) and SDM, the
> CPUID.04H:EAX[bits 25:14] and CPUID.04H:EAX[bits 31:26] should use the
> nearest power-of-2 integer.
>
> The nearest power-of-2 integer can be calculated by pow2ceil() or by
> using APIC ID offset/width (like L3 topology using 1 << die_offset [3]).
>
> But in fact, CPUID.04H:EAX[bits 25:14] and CPUID.04H:EAX[bits 31:26]
> are associated with APIC ID. For example, in linux kernel, the field
> "num_threads_sharing" (Bits 25 - 14) is parsed with APIC ID. And for
> another example, on Alder Lake P, the CPUID.04H:EAX[bits 31:26] is not
> matched with actual core numbers and it's calculated by:
> "(1 << (pkg_offset - core_offset)) - 1".
>
> Therefore the topology information of APIC ID should be preferred to
> calculate nearest power-of-2 integer for CPUID.04H:EAX[bits 25:14] and
> CPUID.04H:EAX[bits 31:26]:
> 1. d/i cache is shared in a core, 1 << core_offset should be used
> instead of "cs->nr_threads" in encode_cache_cpuid4() for
> CPUID.04H.00H:EAX[bits 25:14] and CPUID.04H.01H:EAX[bits 25:14].
> 2. L2 cache is supposed to be shared in a core as for now, thereby
> 1 << core_offset should also be used instead of "cs->nr_threads" in
> encode_cache_cpuid4() for CPUID.04H.02H:EAX[bits 25:14].
> 3. Similarly, the value for CPUID.04H:EAX[bits 31:26] should also be
> calculated with the bit width between the package and SMT levels in
> the APIC ID (1 << (pkg_offset - core_offset) - 1).
>
> In addition, use APIC ID bits calculations to replace "pow2ceil()" for
> cache_info_passthrough case.
>
> [1]: efb3934adf9e ("x86: cpu: make sure number of addressable IDs for processor cores meets the spec")
> [2]: d7caf13b5fcf ("x86: cpu: fixup number of addressable IDs for logical processors sharing cache")
> [3]: d65af288a84d ("i386: Update new x86_apicid parsing rules with die_offset support")
>
> Fixes: 7e3482f82480 ("i386: Helpers to encode cache information consistently")
> Suggested-by: Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com>
> Tested-by: Yongwei Ma <yongwei.ma@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
> ---
> Changes since v7:
> * Fixed calculations in cache_info_passthrough case. (Xiaoyao)
> * Renamed variables as *_width. (Xiaoyao)
> * Unified variable names for encoding cache_info_passthrough case and
> non-cache_info_passthrough case as addressable_cores_width and
> addressable_threads_width.
> * Fixed typos in commit message. (Xiaoyao)
> * Dropped Michael/Babu's ACKed/Tested tags since the code change.
> * Re-added Yongwei's Tested tag For his re-testing.
>
> Changes since v3:
> * Fixed compile warnings. (Babu)
> * Fixed spelling typo.
>
> Changes since v1:
> * Used APIC ID offset to replace "pow2ceil()" for cache_info_passthrough
> case. (Yanan)
> * Split the L1 cache fix into a separate patch.
> * Renamed the title of this patch (the original is "i386/cpu: Fix number
> of addressable IDs in CPUID.04H").
> ---
> target/i386/cpu.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
> index 81d9046167e8..c77bcbc44d59 100644
> --- a/target/i386/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
> @@ -6014,7 +6014,6 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index, uint32_t count,
> {
> X86CPU *cpu = env_archcpu(env);
> CPUState *cs = env_cpu(env);
> - uint32_t die_offset;
> uint32_t limit;
> uint32_t signature[3];
> X86CPUTopoInfo topo_info;
> @@ -6086,7 +6085,10 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index, uint32_t count,
> (cpuid2_cache_descriptor(env->cache_info_cpuid2.l1i_cache) << 8) |
> (cpuid2_cache_descriptor(env->cache_info_cpuid2.l2_cache));
> break;
> - case 4:
> + case 4: {
> + int addressable_cores_width;
> + int addressable_threads_width;
> +
> /* cache info: needed for Core compatibility */
> if (cpu->cache_info_passthrough) {
> x86_cpu_get_cache_cpuid(index, count, eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
> @@ -6098,39 +6100,55 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index, uint32_t count,
> int host_vcpus_per_cache = 1 + ((*eax & 0x3FFC000) >> 14);
> int vcpus_per_socket = cs->nr_cores * cs->nr_threads;
> if (cs->nr_cores > 1) {
> + addressable_cores_width = apicid_pkg_offset(&topo_info) -
> + apicid_core_offset(&topo_info);
> +
> *eax &= ~0xFC000000;
> - *eax |= (pow2ceil(cs->nr_cores) - 1) << 26;
> + *eax |= ((1 << addressable_cores_width) - 1) << 26;
> }
> if (host_vcpus_per_cache > vcpus_per_socket) {
> + /* Share the cache at package level. */
> + addressable_threads_width = apicid_pkg_offset(&topo_info);
> +
> *eax &= ~0x3FFC000;
> - *eax |= (pow2ceil(vcpus_per_socket) - 1) << 14;
> + *eax |= ((1 << addressable_threads_width) - 1) << 14;
> }
> }
> } else if (cpu->vendor_cpuid_only && IS_AMD_CPU(env)) {
> *eax = *ebx = *ecx = *edx = 0;
> } else {
> *eax = 0;
> + addressable_cores_width = apicid_pkg_offset(&topo_info) -
> + apicid_core_offset(&topo_info);
> +
> switch (count) {
> case 0: /* L1 dcache info */
> + addressable_threads_width = apicid_core_offset(&topo_info);
> encode_cache_cpuid4(env->cache_info_cpuid4.l1d_cache,
> - cs->nr_threads, cs->nr_cores,
> + (1 << addressable_threads_width),
> + (1 << addressable_cores_width),
> eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
> break;
> case 1: /* L1 icache info */
> + addressable_threads_width = apicid_core_offset(&topo_info);
> encode_cache_cpuid4(env->cache_info_cpuid4.l1i_cache,
> - cs->nr_threads, cs->nr_cores,
> + (1 << addressable_threads_width),
> + (1 << addressable_cores_width),
> eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
> break;
> case 2: /* L2 cache info */
> + addressable_threads_width = apicid_core_offset(&topo_info);
> encode_cache_cpuid4(env->cache_info_cpuid4.l2_cache,
> - cs->nr_threads, cs->nr_cores,
> + (1 << addressable_threads_width),
> + (1 << addressable_cores_width),
> eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
> break;
> case 3: /* L3 cache info */
> - die_offset = apicid_die_offset(&topo_info);
> if (cpu->enable_l3_cache) {
> + addressable_threads_width = apicid_die_offset(&topo_info);
Please get rid of the local variable @addressable_threads_width.
It is truly confusing. In this patch, it is assigned to
- apicid_pkg_offset(&topo_info);
- apicid_core_offset(&topo_info);
- apicid_die_offset(&topo_info);
in different cases.
I only suggested the name of addressable_core_width in v7, which is
apicid_pkg_offset(&topo_info) - apicid_core_offset(&topo_info);
And it is straightforward that it means the number of bits in x2APICID
to encode different addressable cores.
But it is not similar to addressable_threads_width, the semantic changes
per different cache level. In fact, you want something like
bit_width_of_addressable_threads_sharing_this_level_of_cache.
So I suggest stop using the variable of "address_therads_width". Instead
just apicid_*_offset() directly.
With above fixed, feel free to add my
Reviewed-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
> encode_cache_cpuid4(env->cache_info_cpuid4.l3_cache,
> - (1 << die_offset), cs->nr_cores,
> + (1 << addressable_threads_width),
> + (1 << addressable_cores_width),
> eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
> break;
> }
> @@ -6141,6 +6159,7 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index, uint32_t count,
> }
> }
> break;
> + }
> case 5:
> /* MONITOR/MWAIT Leaf */
> *eax = cpu->mwait.eax; /* Smallest monitor-line size in bytes */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-09 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-27 10:32 [PATCH v9 00/21] Introduce smp.modules for x86 in QEMU Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 01/21] hw/core/machine: Introduce the module as a CPU topology level Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 02/21] hw/core/machine: Support modules in -smp Zhao Liu
2024-02-28 9:56 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-03-11 10:22 ` Mi, Dapeng
2024-03-12 10:12 ` Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 03/21] hw/core: Introduce module-id as the topology subindex Zhao Liu
2024-02-28 9:57 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 04/21] hw/core: Support module-id in numa configuration Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 05/21] i386/cpu: Fix i/d-cache topology to core level for Intel CPU Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 06/21] i386/cpu: Use APIC ID info to encode cache topo in CPUID[4] Zhao Liu
2024-03-09 13:39 ` Xiaoyao Li [this message]
2024-03-10 13:38 ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-11 8:23 ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-11 9:03 ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-03-12 9:04 ` Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 07/21] i386/cpu: Use APIC ID info get NumSharingCache for CPUID[0x8000001D].EAX[bits 25:14] Zhao Liu
2024-02-29 15:13 ` Moger, Babu
2024-03-09 13:41 ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 08/21] i386/cpu: Consolidate the use of topo_info in cpu_x86_cpuid() Zhao Liu
2024-03-09 13:48 ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-03-10 13:44 ` Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 09/21] i386/cpu: Introduce bitmap to cache available CPU topology levels Zhao Liu
2024-03-11 6:28 ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-03-11 8:19 ` Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 10/21] i386: Split topology types of CPUID[0x1F] from the definitions of CPUID[0xB] Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 11/21] i386/cpu: Decouple CPUID[0x1F] subleaf with specific topology level Zhao Liu
2024-03-11 8:45 ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-03-12 10:11 ` Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 12/21] i386: Introduce module level cpu topology to CPUX86State Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 13/21] i386: Support modules_per_die in X86CPUTopoInfo Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 14/21] i386: Expose module level in CPUID[0x1F] Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 15/21] i386: Support module_id in X86CPUTopoIDs Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 16/21] i386/cpu: Introduce module-id to X86CPU Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 17/21] tests: Add test case of APIC ID for module level parsing Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 18/21] hw/i386/pc: Support smp.modules for x86 PC machine Zhao Liu
2024-02-28 21:22 ` Moger, Babu
2024-02-29 7:32 ` Zhao Liu
2024-02-29 15:11 ` Moger, Babu
2024-03-01 6:27 ` Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 19/21] i386: Add cache topology info in CPUCacheInfo Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 20/21] i386/cpu: Use CPUCacheInfo.share_level to encode CPUID[4] Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 21/21] i386/cpu: Use CPUCacheInfo.share_level to encode CPUID[0x8000001D].EAX[bits 25:14] Zhao Liu
2024-02-29 15:11 ` Moger, Babu
2024-02-27 10:41 ` [PATCH v9 00/21] Introduce smp.modules for x86 in QEMU Zhao Liu
2024-03-08 15:20 ` Zhao Liu
2024-02-29 15:14 ` Moger, Babu
2024-03-08 16:36 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-03-09 0:49 ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-09 13:55 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-03-10 13:06 ` Zhao Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c88ee253-f212-4aa7-9db9-e90a99a9a1e3@intel.com \
--to=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=robert.hu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
--cc=yongwei.ma@intel.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com \
--cc=zhuocheng.ding@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).