From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, Rodrigo Dias Correa <r@drigo.nl>,
Kostiantyn Kostiuk <kkostiuk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH trivial v3] qga: use access(2) to check for command existance instead of questionable stat(2)
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2025 10:24:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ca3374f7-61fc-46ef-a12a-c91bc7fb711c@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251101131456.792868-1-mjt@tls.msk.ru>
On 1/11/25 14:14, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> The code checks existance of a command (halt/poweroff/reboot) by using
> stat(2) and immediately checking for S_ISLNK() on the returned stat
> struct. This check will never be true, because stat(2) always follows
> symbolic links and hence will either return ENOENT (in case of dangling
> symlink) or the properties for the final target file. It is lstat(2)
> which might return information about the symlink itself. However, even
> there, we want to check the final file properties, not the first symlink.
>
> This check - S_ISLNK - is harmful but useless in this case. However, it
> is confusing and it helps the wrong usage of stat(2) to spread, so it is
> better to remove it.
>
> Additionally, the code would better to check for the executable bits
> of the final file, not check if it's a regular file - it's sort of
> dubious to have anything but regular files in /sbin/.
>
> But a POSIX system provides another command which suits the purpose
> perfectly: it is access(2). And it is so simple that it's not
> necessary to create a separate function when usin it.
>
> Replace stat(2) with access(X_OK) to check for file existance in
> qga/commands-posix.c
>
> Fixes: c5b4afd4d56e "qga: Support guest shutdown of BusyBox-based systems"
> Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
> ---
> v3: and actually don't forget to commit the changes.
> I'm sorry for the noize.
> v2: fix reverse logic of the access() tests.
> I should write code more often :)
>
> qga/commands-posix.c | 12 +++---------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-02 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-01 13:14 [PATCH trivial v3] qga: use access(2) to check for command existance instead of questionable stat(2) Michael Tokarev
2025-11-01 23:29 ` Rodrigo Dias Correa
2025-11-02 10:12 ` Michael Tokarev
2025-11-03 8:00 ` Kostiantyn Kostiuk
2025-11-02 9:24 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ca3374f7-61fc-46ef-a12a-c91bc7fb711c@linaro.org \
--to=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=kkostiuk@redhat.com \
--cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-trivial@nongnu.org \
--cc=r@drigo.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).