qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
	Gabriel Barreto <sbarreto.gabriel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] GSoC project: API Documentation Generation links and comments
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 17:01:18 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ca896264-89fc-bcb6-9e21-b411bd4f9a01@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA-Faa7j+Dv0L5KPDDwuEvaRMNYNeUNzB8p=ceD3vhyzDw@mail.gmail.com>



On 8/27/19 4:56 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 at 21:52, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> wrote:
>> - For theming, I'm a fan of the RTD theme, because I think it makes the
>> TOC tree stand out better and makes for nicer browsing than the default
>> alabaster theme. Maybe when there's a better over-arching TOC laid out
>> with better organization we could see which themes the list likes best.
> 
> FWIW, for the in-tree doc generation I opted for Alabaster
> (though I prefer RTD's look as well) because Alabaster doesn't
> require shipping any fonts, whereas RTD does, and it seemed
> easier to sidestep any questions about whether a font file in the
> docs was mere aggregation or not. For "putting docs up on the

What do you mean by "mere aggregation"?

> website" this doesn't apply so much, I think. Awkwardly, the
> two themes aren't completely drop-in replacements, though:
> I found that some of the tweaks needed for stuff like the
> sidebar to come out the way I wanted were theme-specific.
> 

That's... unfortunate. I've been playing around with RTD and Alabaster
for a hobby project, but hadn't noticed anything too different yet.

Of course, QEMU is gigantic and it is an edge-case magnet.

--js


  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-27 21:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-26 18:51 [Qemu-devel] GSoC project: API Documentation Generation links and comments Gabriel Barreto
2019-08-27 20:52 ` John Snow
2019-08-27 20:56   ` Peter Maydell
2019-08-27 21:01     ` John Snow [this message]
2019-09-03  8:21       ` Peter Maydell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ca896264-89fc-bcb6-9e21-b411bd4f9a01@redhat.com \
    --to=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=sbarreto.gabriel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).