From: Eric Farman <farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 0/5] Enable virtio-scsi boot from /dev/sgX
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 12:13:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <caa4a6bc-c717-15dd-27fd-de47ddbe30d1@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <76868ba7-610d-ef56-bbd4-ed26f55164dd@de.ibm.com>
On 04/26/2017 11:48 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 04/26/2017 04:46 PM, Eric Farman wrote:
>> Today, trying to boot a guest from a SCSI LUN on s390x yields the following:
>>
>> virtio-blk = OK
>> virtio-scsi and /dev/sdX = OK
>> virtio-scsi and /dev/sgX = FAIL
>>
>> Example of the failing scenario:
>>
>> /usr/bin/qemu-system-s390x ...
>> -device virtio-scsi-ccw,id=scsi0,devno=fe.0.0001
>> -drive file=/dev/sg2,if=none,id=drive0,format=raw
>> -device scsi-generic,bus=scsi0.0,channel=0,scsi-id=0,drive=drive0,id=disk0
>> LOADPARM=[........]
>> Using virtio-scsi.
>> Using SCSI scheme.
>> ..
>> ! virtio-scsi:read_many: STATUS=02 RSPN=70 KEY=0b CODE=00 QLFR=06, sure !
>>
>> Why do we care? Well, libvirt converts a virtio-scsi device from the host
>> SCSI address (host:bus:target:lun) into the associated /dev/sgX device,
>> which means we can't boot from virtio-scsi and have to rely on virtio-blk
>> for this action.
>>
>> The short version of what happens is the host device driver rejects our
>> requests because the transfer lengths are too long for it to satisfy.
>> A virtio-scsi disk connected via scsi-generic is fine as a non-boot device
>> because the guest kernel is able to break up the requests for us. So we just
>> need to handle this situation for the boot process.
>
> Out of curiosity. Why is the guest kernel submitting "short enough" requests?
> If it querying the device itself via scsi commands before issuing commands?
>
Looking at some old traces I have, I think I misspoke that it's the
guest kernel. In the failing case, the host kernel is processing an
ioctl system call via sg_ioctl, and just passing our I/O transaction to
the block driver. It blows up because the number of iovecs needed for
the transaction exceeds UIO_MAXIOV. In the working case (boot from
virtio-scsi as /dev/sdX or virtio-blk), the host kernel goes through
read system call, and the I/O is broken up by do_generic_file_read.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-26 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-26 14:46 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 0/5] Enable virtio-scsi boot from /dev/sgX Eric Farman
2017-04-26 14:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 1/5] hw/scsi: Override the max_sectors value for virtio-scsi Eric Farman
2017-05-05 7:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-05 7:50 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-04-26 14:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 2/5] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Remove duplicate blk_factor adjustment Eric Farman
2017-05-05 7:10 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-04-26 14:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 3/5] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Move SCSI block factor to outer read Eric Farman
2017-04-26 14:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 4/5] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Break up virtio-scsi read into multiples Eric Farman
2017-04-26 15:17 ` Eric Blake
2017-04-26 15:24 ` Eric Farman
2017-04-26 16:00 ` Eric Farman
2017-04-26 15:47 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-04-26 14:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 5/5] pc-bios/s390-ccw.img: rebuild image Eric Farman
2017-04-26 15:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 0/5] Enable virtio-scsi boot from /dev/sgX Christian Borntraeger
2017-04-26 16:13 ` Eric Farman [this message]
2017-05-05 7:41 ` Fam Zheng
2017-05-05 15:03 ` Eric Farman
2017-05-05 15:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-05 16:12 ` Eric Farman
2017-05-06 8:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-08 7:00 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-05-08 15:00 ` Eric Farman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=caa4a6bc-c717-15dd-27fd-de47ddbe30d1@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).