From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] chardev's and fd's in monitors
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 23:06:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <caebc468-9d87-d58c-ebc9-1354f16c3fb8@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zilykqud.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
On 21/10/2016 11:12, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> On 20/10/2016 10:37, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> You have a problem of context - if you have multiple monitors, how do
>>> you know which to send the error back to if you're not in the event
>>> loop thread, and thus cur_mon is NULL. With Marc-Andre's series which
>>> allows proper async command processing it gets even harder, because
>>> there's potentially many outstanding commands associated with a monitor
>>> and you need to decide which the error should be given to.
>>
>> Why should it even consult the current monitor? Shouldn't errors go to
>> all HMP monitors when QEMU falls back to error_report?
>
> Maybe. Copying error_report() output to human monitors is a courtesy to
> users who fail to watch stderr. But what about QMP? I figure all we
> could do there is sending some "Uh, here's an error message that may or
> may not be related to anything you've been doing in this monitor, do
> with it what you want" event. Would that be useful?
>
> Also, when you got an HMP monitor and stderr on the same tty (or
> whatever), you'd want to suppress one of the two messages.
If you have an HMP monitor you wouldn't print to stderr---stderr would
be reserved for the case where there are only QMP monitors.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-21 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-12 19:15 [Qemu-devel] chardev's and fd's in monitors Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-10-12 20:02 ` Marc-André Lureau
2016-10-13 15:47 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-10-18 10:04 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-10-18 11:32 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-10-18 11:41 ` Marc-André Lureau
2016-10-18 11:44 ` Marc-André Lureau
2016-10-18 12:01 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-10-18 13:25 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-10-18 13:35 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-10-18 13:52 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-10-18 14:01 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-10-18 18:53 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-10-19 7:45 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-10-19 8:00 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-10-19 8:12 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-10-19 8:42 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-10-19 9:48 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-10-19 10:05 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-10-19 10:16 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-10-19 12:16 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-10-19 12:21 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-10-19 18:06 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-10-20 8:37 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-10-20 8:53 ` Marc-André Lureau
2016-10-20 10:45 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-10-20 16:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-21 9:12 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-10-21 21:06 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2016-10-24 7:07 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-10-21 9:35 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-10-20 16:59 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-10-20 8:55 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-10-20 9:03 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-10-20 9:58 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-10-20 10:42 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-10-20 11:01 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-10-20 11:10 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-10-20 11:45 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-10-20 11:08 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-10-20 11:57 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-10-20 17:56 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-10-21 9:06 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-10-21 9:37 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-10-21 11:56 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-10-21 9:45 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-10-19 12:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-19 17:01 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-10-19 20:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-20 8:34 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-10-18 12:08 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-10-18 12:13 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-10-18 12:43 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-10-18 10:06 ` Daniel P. Berrange
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=caebc468-9d87-d58c-ebc9-1354f16c3fb8@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).