From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54317) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c3ij0-0007M5-UW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 07:08:31 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c3iiv-0000Eh-VO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 07:08:30 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-x243.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::243]:33183) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c3iiv-0000D5-OF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 07:08:25 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-x243.google.com with SMTP id u144so16101351wmu.0 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 04:08:25 -0800 (PST) Sender: Richard Henderson References: <1478413123-4575-1-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> From: Richard Henderson Message-ID: Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 13:08:12 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] target-m68k patches List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Laurent Vivier , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 11/06/2016 08:52 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote: >> Richard Henderson (4): >> target-m68k: Do not cpu_abort on undefined insns >> target-m68k: Inline shifts >> target-m68k: Implement bitfield ops for registers >> target-m68k: Implement bitfield ops for memory > > There is something wrong with the bitfield patches, because when I use > them instead of the version I use usually I'm not able to boot a > container with qemu-m68k (SEGFAULT). Ah, too bad. I was testing with the linux-user-0.3 busybox, but we don't yet implement enough to actually execute it. So the testing consisted of maybe 3 or 4 such insns until I reach the fmovemx. ;-) Can you tell if the breakage is limited to the memory patch, or if the register patch is also broken? r~