From: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-6.2 0/7] linux-user: Clean up siginfo_t handling for arm, aarch64
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 15:12:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cc70282b-0d50-0a05-29de-198b601a6dfd@vivier.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210813131809.28655-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Le 13/08/2021 à 15:18, Peter Maydell a écrit :
> Coverity reported that we don't set the _sifields union when queuing
> the SIGTRAP for EXCP_DEBUG events on aarch64. This series fixes that
> bug and a few others, and cleans up the way we queue fault signals
> to be less error-prone.
>
> The underlying cause of the bug is that when queueing a signal
> the code must set the right field in the _sifields union depending
> on the si_type that it passes to queue_signal(), and there's nothing
> guarding against forgetting to do this. The "fill in a whole struct
> and then call queue_signal()" code is also a bit longwinded. In the
> real kernel, there is a function force_sig_fault() which does this
> for the SI_FAULT signal type. The series provides a QEMU implementation
> of this (which goes alongside the existing force_sig() that does this
> for SI_KILL signals), and uses it in the arm and aarch64 code.
> Because force_sig_fault() takes the address as an argument, it's
> not possible for the caller to forget to fill it in.
>
> Obviously we should also convert the other targets where they are
> directly calling queue_signal() (there are other places that forget
> to fill in the sifields union fields; I don't know why Coverity
> hasn't spotted those). But I thought it better to send this out
> for review of the new API and approach before spending time on
> converting other targets. (In particular fixing places where
> EXCP_DEBUG handling forgets to set the sifields address is a
> pain, because in the real kernel different architectures might
> either report the PC or else report a zero address here, so it
> requires looking into the kernel sources to check which...)
> Once all the archs are cleaned up we might be able to make
> queue_signal() static so it's local to signal.c.
>
> PS: there's probably a trivial conflict with my include-file-split
> patchseries.
>
> thanks
> -- PMM
>
> Peter Maydell (7):
> linux-user/aarch64: Set siginfo_t addr field for SIGTRAP signals
> linux-user/arm: Set siginfo_t addr field for SIGTRAP signals
> linux-user/arm: Use force_sig() to deliver fpa11 emulation SIGFPE
> linux-user: Zero out target_siginfo_t in force_sig()
> linux-user: Provide new force_sig_fault() function
> linux-user/arm: Use force_sig_fault()
> linux-user/aarch64: Use force_sig_fault()
>
> linux-user/signal-common.h | 1 +
> linux-user/aarch64/cpu_loop.c | 33 +++++-------------
> linux-user/arm/cpu_loop.c | 64 +++++++++++------------------------
> linux-user/signal.c | 19 ++++++++++-
> 4 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
>
Applied to my linux-user-for-6.2 branch.
Thanks,
Laurent
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-23 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-13 13:18 [PATCH for-6.2 0/7] linux-user: Clean up siginfo_t handling for arm, aarch64 Peter Maydell
2021-08-13 13:18 ` [PATCH for-6.2 1/7] linux-user/aarch64: Set siginfo_t addr field for SIGTRAP signals Peter Maydell
2021-08-15 19:51 ` Richard Henderson
2021-08-13 13:18 ` [PATCH for-6.2 2/7] linux-user/arm: " Peter Maydell
2021-08-15 19:53 ` Richard Henderson
2021-08-13 13:18 ` [PATCH for-6.2 3/7] linux-user/arm: Use force_sig() to deliver fpa11 emulation SIGFPE Peter Maydell
2021-08-15 20:00 ` Richard Henderson
2021-08-13 13:18 ` [PATCH for-6.2 4/7] linux-user: Zero out target_siginfo_t in force_sig() Peter Maydell
2021-08-15 20:00 ` Richard Henderson
2021-08-13 13:18 ` [PATCH for-6.2 5/7] linux-user: Provide new force_sig_fault() function Peter Maydell
2021-08-15 20:10 ` Richard Henderson
2021-08-16 9:03 ` Peter Maydell
2021-08-16 17:27 ` Richard Henderson
2021-08-13 13:18 ` [PATCH for-6.2 6/7] linux-user/arm: Use force_sig_fault() Peter Maydell
2021-08-15 20:25 ` Richard Henderson
2021-08-13 13:18 ` [PATCH for-6.2 7/7] linux-user/aarch64: " Peter Maydell
2021-08-15 20:29 ` Richard Henderson
2021-09-23 13:12 ` Laurent Vivier [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cc70282b-0d50-0a05-29de-198b601a6dfd@vivier.eu \
--to=laurent@vivier.eu \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).