From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>,
"Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] docs: fix mistake in dirty bitmap feature description
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 16:15:52 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ccc0020d-ae27-6e8a-d76e-55615c74befb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a88ad335-05b1-b720-5689-1c477bd55d1f@virtuozzo.com>
On 1/28/21 11:21 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 28.01.2021 20:13, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
>> Original specification says that l1 table size if 64 * l1_size, which
>> is obviously wrong. The size of the l1 entry is 64 _bits_, not bytes.
>> Thus 64 is to be replaces with 8 as specification says about bytes.
>>
>> There is also minor tweak, field name is renamed from l1 to l1_table,
>> which matches with the later text.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
>> CC: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
>> CC: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
>
I saw the subject "dirty bitmap", and assumed it would go through my
dirty bitmap tree. In reality, it's unrelated to the dirty bitmap code.
Would an improved subject line help?
>> ---
>> docs/interop/parallels.txt | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/docs/interop/parallels.txt b/docs/interop/parallels.txt
>> index e9271eba5d..f15bf35bd1 100644
>> --- a/docs/interop/parallels.txt
>> +++ b/docs/interop/parallels.txt
>> @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ of its data area are:
>> 28 - 31: l1_size
>> The number of entries in the L1 table of the bitmap.
>> - variable: l1 (64 * l1_size bytes)
>> + variable: l1_table (8 * l1_size bytes)
>> L1 offset table (in bytes)
>
> I don't remember why this "(in bytes)" is here.. What in bytes? L1 table
> size? But the described field is not L1 table size, but L1 table
> itself.. It's not in bytes, it's just L1 table :)
>
> So, I'd also drop "(in bytes)" while being here. Or the whole line "L1
> offset table (in bytes)" altogether.
>
>> A dirty bitmap is stored using a one-level structure for the
>> mapping to host
>>
>
>
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-02 22:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-28 17:13 [PATCH 1/1] docs: fix mistake in dirty bitmap feature description Denis V. Lunev
2021-01-28 17:21 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-02-02 22:15 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2021-02-02 22:50 ` Denis V. Lunev
2021-02-02 23:08 ` Eric Blake
2021-02-03 10:29 ` Denis V. Lunev
2021-02-03 16:50 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ccc0020d-ae27-6e8a-d76e-55615c74befb@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=den@openvz.org \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).