From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 1/5] block/nbd: Fix hang in .bdrv_close()
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 13:09:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cd184838-6c1f-0d22-1d89-415dbd62955b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190712110110.GE4514@dhcp-200-226.str.redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4100 bytes --]
On 12.07.19 13:01, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 12.07.2019 um 12:47 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
>> On 12.07.19 11:24, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> Am 11.07.2019 um 21:58 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
>>>> When nbd_close() is called from a coroutine, the connection_co never
>>>> gets to run, and thus nbd_teardown_connection() hangs.
>>>>
>>>> This is because aio_co_enter() only puts the connection_co into the main
>>>> coroutine's wake-up queue, so this main coroutine needs to yield and
>>>> reschedule itself to let the connection_co run.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> block/nbd.c | 12 +++++++++++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/block/nbd.c b/block/nbd.c
>>>> index 81edabbf35..b83b6cd43e 100644
>>>> --- a/block/nbd.c
>>>> +++ b/block/nbd.c
>>>> @@ -135,7 +135,17 @@ static void nbd_teardown_connection(BlockDriverState *bs)
>>>> qio_channel_shutdown(s->ioc,
>>>> QIO_CHANNEL_SHUTDOWN_BOTH,
>>>> NULL);
>>>> - BDRV_POLL_WHILE(bs, s->connection_co);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (qemu_in_coroutine()) {
>>>> + /* Let our caller poll and just yield until connection_co is done */
>>>> + while (s->connection_co) {
>>>> + aio_co_schedule(qemu_get_current_aio_context(),
>>>> + qemu_coroutine_self());
>>>> + qemu_coroutine_yield();
>>>> + }
>>>
>>> Isn't this busy waiting? Why not let s->connection_co wake us up when
>>> it's about to terminate instead of immediately rescheduling ourselves?
>>
>> Yes, it is busy waiting, but I didn’t find that bad. The connection_co
>> will be invoked in basically every iteration, and once there is no
>> pending data, it will quit.
>>
>> The answer to “why not...” of course is because it’d be more complicated.
>>
>> But anyway.
>>
>> Adding a new function qemu_coroutine_run_after(target) that adds
>> qemu_coroutine_self() to the given @target coroutine’s wake-up queue and
>> then using that instead of scheduling works, too, yes.
>>
>> I don’t really like being responsible for coroutine code, though...
>>
>> (And maybe it’d be better to make it qemu_coroutine_yield_for(target),
>> which does the above and then yields?)
>
> Or just do something like this, which is arguably not only a fix for the
> busy wait, but also a code simplification:
1. Is that guaranteed to work? What if data sneaks in, the
connection_co handles that, and doesn’t wake up the teardown_co? Will
it be re-scheduled?
2. I precisely didn’t want to do this because we have this functionality
already in the form of Coroutine.co_queue_wakeup. Why duplicate it here?
Max
> diff --git a/block/nbd.c b/block/nbd.c
> index b83b6cd43e..c061bd1bfc 100644
> --- a/block/nbd.c
> +++ b/block/nbd.c
> @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ typedef struct BDRVNBDState {
> CoMutex send_mutex;
> CoQueue free_sema;
> Coroutine *connection_co;
> + Coroutine *teardown_co;
> int in_flight;
>
> NBDClientRequest requests[MAX_NBD_REQUESTS];
> @@ -137,12 +138,9 @@ static void nbd_teardown_connection(BlockDriverState *bs)
> NULL);
>
> if (qemu_in_coroutine()) {
> - /* Let our caller poll and just yield until connection_co is done */
> - while (s->connection_co) {
> - aio_co_schedule(qemu_get_current_aio_context(),
> - qemu_coroutine_self());
> - qemu_coroutine_yield();
> - }
> + /* just yield until connection_co is done */
> + s->teardown_co = qemu_coroutine_self();
> + qemu_coroutine_yield();
> } else {
> BDRV_POLL_WHILE(bs, s->connection_co);
> }
> @@ -217,6 +215,9 @@ static coroutine_fn void nbd_connection_entry(void *opaque)
> bdrv_dec_in_flight(s->bs);
>
> s->connection_co = NULL;
> + if (s->teardown_co) {
> + aio_co_wake(s->teardown_co);
> + }
> aio_wait_kick();
> }
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-12 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-11 19:57 [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/5] block: Generic file truncation/creation fallbacks Max Reitz
2019-07-11 19:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 1/5] block/nbd: Fix hang in .bdrv_close() Max Reitz
2019-07-12 9:24 ` Kevin Wolf
2019-07-12 10:47 ` Max Reitz
2019-07-12 11:01 ` Kevin Wolf
2019-07-12 11:09 ` Max Reitz [this message]
2019-07-12 11:23 ` Kevin Wolf
2019-07-12 11:44 ` Max Reitz
2019-07-12 12:30 ` Kevin Wolf
2019-07-11 19:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 2/5] block: Generic truncation fallback Max Reitz
2019-07-12 9:49 ` Kevin Wolf
2019-07-12 10:58 ` Max Reitz
2019-07-12 11:17 ` Kevin Wolf
2019-07-12 11:48 ` Max Reitz
2019-07-12 13:48 ` Max Reitz
2019-07-11 19:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 3/5] block: Fall back to fallback truncate function Max Reitz
2019-07-12 10:04 ` Kevin Wolf
2019-07-12 11:05 ` Max Reitz
2019-07-11 19:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 4/5] block: Generic file creation fallback Max Reitz
2019-07-11 19:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 5/5] iotests: Add test for fallback truncate/create Max Reitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cd184838-6c1f-0d22-1d89-415dbd62955b@redhat.com \
--to=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).