qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 1/5] block/nbd: Fix hang in .bdrv_close()
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 13:09:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cd184838-6c1f-0d22-1d89-415dbd62955b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190712110110.GE4514@dhcp-200-226.str.redhat.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4100 bytes --]

On 12.07.19 13:01, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 12.07.2019 um 12:47 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
>> On 12.07.19 11:24, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> Am 11.07.2019 um 21:58 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
>>>> When nbd_close() is called from a coroutine, the connection_co never
>>>> gets to run, and thus nbd_teardown_connection() hangs.
>>>>
>>>> This is because aio_co_enter() only puts the connection_co into the main
>>>> coroutine's wake-up queue, so this main coroutine needs to yield and
>>>> reschedule itself to let the connection_co run.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  block/nbd.c | 12 +++++++++++-
>>>>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/block/nbd.c b/block/nbd.c
>>>> index 81edabbf35..b83b6cd43e 100644
>>>> --- a/block/nbd.c
>>>> +++ b/block/nbd.c
>>>> @@ -135,7 +135,17 @@ static void nbd_teardown_connection(BlockDriverState *bs)
>>>>      qio_channel_shutdown(s->ioc,
>>>>                           QIO_CHANNEL_SHUTDOWN_BOTH,
>>>>                           NULL);
>>>> -    BDRV_POLL_WHILE(bs, s->connection_co);
>>>> +
>>>> +    if (qemu_in_coroutine()) {
>>>> +        /* Let our caller poll and just yield until connection_co is done */
>>>> +        while (s->connection_co) {
>>>> +            aio_co_schedule(qemu_get_current_aio_context(),
>>>> +                            qemu_coroutine_self());
>>>> +            qemu_coroutine_yield();
>>>> +        }
>>>
>>> Isn't this busy waiting? Why not let s->connection_co wake us up when
>>> it's about to terminate instead of immediately rescheduling ourselves?
>>
>> Yes, it is busy waiting, but I didn’t find that bad.  The connection_co
>> will be invoked in basically every iteration, and once there is no
>> pending data, it will quit.
>>
>> The answer to “why not...” of course is because it’d be more complicated.
>>
>> But anyway.
>>
>> Adding a new function qemu_coroutine_run_after(target) that adds
>> qemu_coroutine_self() to the given @target coroutine’s wake-up queue and
>> then using that instead of scheduling works, too, yes.
>>
>> I don’t really like being responsible for coroutine code, though...
>>
>> (And maybe it’d be better to make it qemu_coroutine_yield_for(target),
>> which does the above and then yields?)
> 
> Or just do something like this, which is arguably not only a fix for the
> busy wait, but also a code simplification:

1. Is that guaranteed to work?  What if data sneaks in, the
connection_co handles that, and doesn’t wake up the teardown_co?  Will
it be re-scheduled?

2. I precisely didn’t want to do this because we have this functionality
already in the form of Coroutine.co_queue_wakeup.  Why duplicate it here?

Max

> diff --git a/block/nbd.c b/block/nbd.c
> index b83b6cd43e..c061bd1bfc 100644
> --- a/block/nbd.c
> +++ b/block/nbd.c
> @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ typedef struct BDRVNBDState {
>      CoMutex send_mutex;
>      CoQueue free_sema;
>      Coroutine *connection_co;
> +    Coroutine *teardown_co;
>      int in_flight;
> 
>      NBDClientRequest requests[MAX_NBD_REQUESTS];
> @@ -137,12 +138,9 @@ static void nbd_teardown_connection(BlockDriverState *bs)
>                           NULL);
> 
>      if (qemu_in_coroutine()) {
> -        /* Let our caller poll and just yield until connection_co is done */
> -        while (s->connection_co) {
> -            aio_co_schedule(qemu_get_current_aio_context(),
> -                            qemu_coroutine_self());
> -            qemu_coroutine_yield();
> -        }
> +        /* just yield until connection_co is done */
> +        s->teardown_co = qemu_coroutine_self();
> +        qemu_coroutine_yield();
>      } else {
>          BDRV_POLL_WHILE(bs, s->connection_co);
>      }
> @@ -217,6 +215,9 @@ static coroutine_fn void nbd_connection_entry(void *opaque)
>      bdrv_dec_in_flight(s->bs);
> 
>      s->connection_co = NULL;
> +    if (s->teardown_co) {
> +        aio_co_wake(s->teardown_co);
> +    }
>      aio_wait_kick();
>  }
> 



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-12 11:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-11 19:57 [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/5] block: Generic file truncation/creation fallbacks Max Reitz
2019-07-11 19:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 1/5] block/nbd: Fix hang in .bdrv_close() Max Reitz
2019-07-12  9:24   ` Kevin Wolf
2019-07-12 10:47     ` Max Reitz
2019-07-12 11:01       ` Kevin Wolf
2019-07-12 11:09         ` Max Reitz [this message]
2019-07-12 11:23           ` Kevin Wolf
2019-07-12 11:44             ` Max Reitz
2019-07-12 12:30               ` Kevin Wolf
2019-07-11 19:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 2/5] block: Generic truncation fallback Max Reitz
2019-07-12  9:49   ` Kevin Wolf
2019-07-12 10:58     ` Max Reitz
2019-07-12 11:17       ` Kevin Wolf
2019-07-12 11:48         ` Max Reitz
2019-07-12 13:48           ` Max Reitz
2019-07-11 19:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 3/5] block: Fall back to fallback truncate function Max Reitz
2019-07-12 10:04   ` Kevin Wolf
2019-07-12 11:05     ` Max Reitz
2019-07-11 19:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 4/5] block: Generic file creation fallback Max Reitz
2019-07-11 19:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 5/5] iotests: Add test for fallback truncate/create Max Reitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cd184838-6c1f-0d22-1d89-415dbd62955b@redhat.com \
    --to=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).