From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43976) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gi5Xo-0008WU-WF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 17:44:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gi5Xo-0006hL-Af for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 17:44:52 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-x542.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::542]:43833) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gi5Xn-0006gj-WB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 17:44:52 -0500 Received: by mail-pg1-x542.google.com with SMTP id v28so6885931pgk.10 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 14:44:51 -0800 (PST) References: <20190111220131.27153-1-jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> <2064503c-ed12-de29-59a9-46fa24d22f60@linaro.org> From: Richard Henderson Message-ID: Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 09:44:45 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] target/xtensa: rework zero overhead loops implementation List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Max Filippov Cc: qemu-devel On 1/12/19 9:27 AM, Max Filippov wrote: > Maybe "Any other value means that an instruction that ends at this offset > from the page start may loop back and will need loopback code to be generated"? Much better, thanks. r~