From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Lukáš Doktor" <ldoktor@redhat.com>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] iothread: fix iothread hang when stop too soon
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 15:44:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cd92ce4d-e78f-1ad2-18d0-f50a0343e990@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190129051432.22023-1-peterx@redhat.com>
On 2019-01-29 06:14, Peter Xu wrote:
> Lukas reported an hard to reproduce QMP iothread hang on s390 that
> QEMU might hang at pthread_join() of the QMP monitor iothread before
> quitting:
>
> Thread 1
> #0 0x000003ffad10932c in pthread_join
> #1 0x0000000109e95750 in qemu_thread_join
> at /home/thuth/devel/qemu/util/qemu-thread-posix.c:570
> #2 0x0000000109c95a1c in iothread_stop
> #3 0x0000000109bb0874 in monitor_cleanup
> #4 0x0000000109b55042 in main
>
> While the iothread is still in the main loop:
>
> Thread 4
> #0 0x000003ffad0010e4 in ??
> #1 0x000003ffad553958 in g_main_context_iterate.isra.19
> #2 0x000003ffad553d90 in g_main_loop_run
> #3 0x0000000109c9585a in iothread_run
> at /home/thuth/devel/qemu/iothread.c:74
> #4 0x0000000109e94752 in qemu_thread_start
> at /home/thuth/devel/qemu/util/qemu-thread-posix.c:502
> #5 0x000003ffad10825a in start_thread
> #6 0x000003ffad00dcf2 in thread_start
>
> IMHO it's because there's a race between the main thread and iothread
> when stopping the thread in following sequence:
>
> main thread iothread
> =========== ==============
> aio_poll()
> iothread_get_g_main_context
> set iothread->worker_context
> iothread_stop
> schedule iothread_stop_bh
> execute iothread_stop_bh [1]
> set iothread->running=false
> (since main_loop==NULL so
> skip to quit main loop.
> Note: although main_loop is
> NULL but worker_context is
> not!)
> atomic_read(&iothread->worker_context) [2]
> create main_loop object
> g_main_loop_run() [3]
> pthread_join() [4]
>
> We can see that when execute iothread_stop_bh() at [1] it's possible
> that main_loop is still NULL because it's only created until the first
> check of the worker_context later at [2]. Then the iothread will hang
> in the main loop [3] and it'll starve the main thread too [4].
>
> Here the simple solution should be that we check again the "running"
> variable before check against worker_context.
>
> CC: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> CC: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
> CC: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> CC: Lukáš Doktor <ldoktor@redhat.com>
> CC: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
> CC: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
> CC: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Reported-by: Lukáš Doktor <ldoktor@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> This hasn't yet been verified on the initial s390 systems, but since I
> can reproduce it locally with this code clip:
>
> IOThread *iothread = iothread_create("test", NULL);
> iothread_get_g_main_context(iothread);
> iothread_stop(iothread);
>
> so I'm still posting this out for review first in case it was hit by
> other users.
> ---
> iothread.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/iothread.c b/iothread.c
> index 2fb1cdf55d..e615b7ae52 100644
> --- a/iothread.c
> +++ b/iothread.c
> @@ -63,7 +63,11 @@ static void *iothread_run(void *opaque)
> while (iothread->running) {
> aio_poll(iothread->ctx, true);
>
> - if (atomic_read(&iothread->worker_context)) {
> + /*
> + * We must check the running state again in case it was
> + * changed in previous aio_poll()
> + */
> + if (iothread->running && atomic_read(&iothread->worker_context)) {
> GMainLoop *loop;
>
> g_main_context_push_thread_default(iothread->worker_context);
>
I ran this on s390x with Lukáš' reproducer for a while now, and so far I
haven't seen any hangs anymore. Thus this seems to fix the issue as far
as I can see, thanks!
Tested-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-29 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-29 5:14 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] iothread: fix iothread hang when stop too soon Peter Xu
2019-01-29 14:44 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2019-01-30 2:50 ` Peter Xu
2019-01-29 16:20 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-01-30 3:01 ` Peter Xu
2019-01-30 3:28 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cd92ce4d-e78f-1ad2-18d0-f50a0343e990@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=ldoktor@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).