From: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Sphinx and docs/index.rst: dead code?
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:26:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ce2ae0c3-8b4c-6fc0-2be2-cf1883ccd1e1@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8s=YbvO7Qw4twt5NemH4vVbZX8_mi5LveTYgYYQY5YNA@mail.gmail.com>
On 7/25/19 12:42 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 at 17:34, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Yup; I think a single point of entry would be nice -- I think we need to
>> start hosting our sphinx documentation because it's confusing that we
>> have both the traditional manual (hosted by Stefan Weil) and this newer
>> one that isn't available anywhere.
>>
>> The interop manual in particular is crucial to get hosted.
>
> Yes, this would be a good thing.
>
>> We could perhaps formalize this as follows:
>>
>> - index.rst, which is an "absolutely everything included" single point
>> of entry manual for developers and contributors,
>>
>> - user.rst, which could be a single point of entry for end users, to be
>> bundled in distro packaging.
>
> This means you'll end up building 90% of our documentation twice,
> which is something I was trying to avoid with the current setup.
>
Why? Wouldn't it suffice to build just one of the top-level docs just once?
(I guess if you later decided to build the other top-level doc later it
would duplicate the work, but is that the usual case?)
> It occurs to me that we don't necessarily need the 'top level'
> page to be generated by Sphinx -- we could just ship an index.html
> which has helpful links to the individual manuals.
>
True; we can leave it as a manual process and check the build artifact
into the repo if we want. [We likely ought to leave the source in the
tree in that case though, if we want to update the theming and other stuff.]
> (https://wiki.qemu.org/Features/Documentation is the current
> plan and lists the various manuals we'll end up with. 'user'
> in that plan means the documentation for the user-mode emulation.)
>
Ah, whoops -- sorry for the namespace collision. I'll call it
'user-manual' or something instead if I talk about this in the future.
Thanks for the wiki page.
> thanks
> -- PMM
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-25 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-24 23:22 [Qemu-devel] Sphinx and docs/index.rst: dead code? John Snow
2019-07-25 9:08 ` Peter Maydell
2019-07-25 16:34 ` John Snow
2019-07-25 16:42 ` Peter Maydell
2019-07-25 17:26 ` John Snow [this message]
2019-07-25 17:53 ` Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ce2ae0c3-8b4c-6fc0-2be2-cf1883ccd1e1@redhat.com \
--to=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).