From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1872C433DF for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 15:42:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33AE22177B for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 15:42:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="A/CsEFqu" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 33AE22177B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:33356 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kBK37-0006Do-55 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:42:49 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55844) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kBJyG-0007Ic-9g for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:37:48 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:32411 helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kBJyE-00088E-Ok for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:37:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1598542665; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vIcj6f86mNf1/zS+zr7uq2KN67HtdMZ7lT+sx5QuPhU=; b=A/CsEFquSKAMtzUBlzp03daYLZidph19YpSbeWPQCYP+e2PiZ9onHOWoKMIW9lsFOBIW1J jttGziBOhBa6+xbBd8NmJXcQLRbbEkYFLqY1znUol6mjXrl1aJZrnBntY2C8ybRyAe+MEg mN70zcAfA3Ka2Bo/uasrTp4W9l/mHZ8= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-105-Ld5n-anXN5uL2VMFR2LdBA-1; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:37:43 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Ld5n-anXN5uL2VMFR2LdBA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5C2A425D3; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 15:37:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thuth.remote.csb (ovpn-112-56.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.56]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C10410429DC; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 15:37:41 +0000 (UTC) To: Anthony Green From: Thomas Huth Subject: Is qemu-system-moxie still used? Message-ID: Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 17:37:40 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=thuth@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=207.211.31.120; envelope-from=thuth@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/08/27 02:56:52 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -30 X-Spam_score: -3.1 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.959, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , QEMU Developers Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Hi Anthony, we are currently considering to deprecate and finally remove some of the targets in QEMU that did not get much attention during the past years. qemu-system-moxie is one the targets where the status is not quite clear ... are you or anybody else still using it? If so, how do you test that the current version of QEMU is still running fine? Are there any moxie binaries publicly available somewhere in the internet that could be used for regression testing? Thanks, Thomas