From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] spapr_numa: consider user input when defining associativity
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 19:44:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf0a0fbf-5c4f-96d6-039d-780513a724e0@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201007172849.302240-5-danielhb413@gmail.com>
On 10/7/20 7:28 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> A new function called spapr_numa_define_associativity_domains()
> is created to calculate the associativity domains and change
> the associativity arrays considering user input. This is how
> the associativity domain between two NUMA nodes A and B is
> calculated:
>
> - get the distance D between them
>
> - get the correspondent NUMA level 'n_level' for D. This is done
> via a helper called spapr_numa_get_numa_level()
>
> - all associativity arrays were initialized with their own
> numa_ids, and we're calculating the distance in node_id ascending
> order, starting from node id 0 (the first node retrieved by
> numa_state). This will have a cascade effect in the algorithm because
> the associativity domains that node 0 defines will be carried over to
> other nodes, and node 1 associativities will be carried over after
> taking node 0 associativities into account, and so on. This
> happens because we'll assign assoc_src as the associativity domain
> of dst as well, for all NUMA levels beyond and including n_level.
>
> The PPC kernel expects the associativity domains of the first node
> (node id 0) to be always 0 [1], and this algorithm will grant that
> by default.
>
> Ultimately, all of this results in a best effort approximation for
> the actual NUMA distances the user input in the command line. Given
> the nature of how PAPR itself interprets NUMA distances versus the
> expectations risen by how ACPI SLIT works, there might be better
> algorithms but, in the end, it'll also result in another way to
> approximate what the user really wanted.
>
> To keep this commit message no longer than it already is, the next
> patch will update the existing documentation in ppc-spapr-numa.rst
> with more in depth details and design considerations/drawbacks.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/5e8fbea3-8faf-0951-172a-b41a2138fbcf@gmail.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
> ---
> capstone | 2 +-
> hw/ppc/spapr_numa.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/capstone b/capstone
> index f8b1b83301..22ead3e0bf 160000
> --- a/capstone
> +++ b/capstone
> @@ -1 +1 @@
> -Subproject commit f8b1b833015a4ae47110ed068e0deb7106ced66d
> +Subproject commit 22ead3e0bfdb87516656453336160e0a37b066bf
Certainly unrelated to your patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-12 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-07 17:28 [PATCH v4 0/5] pseries NUMA distance calculation Daniel Henrique Barboza
2020-10-07 17:28 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] spapr: add spapr_machine_using_legacy_numa() helper Daniel Henrique Barboza
2020-10-07 17:28 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] spapr_numa: forbid asymmetrical NUMA setups Daniel Henrique Barboza
2020-10-07 17:28 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] spapr_numa: change reference-points and maxdomain settings Daniel Henrique Barboza
2020-10-07 17:28 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] spapr_numa: consider user input when defining associativity Daniel Henrique Barboza
2020-10-12 17:44 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2020-10-12 22:48 ` David Gibson
2020-10-07 17:28 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] specs/ppc-spapr-numa: update with new NUMA support Daniel Henrique Barboza
2020-10-08 9:13 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] pseries NUMA distance calculation Greg Kurz
2020-10-08 11:07 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2020-10-08 23:52 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cf0a0fbf-5c4f-96d6-039d-780513a724e0@redhat.com \
--to=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=danielhb413@gmail.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).