From: Matthew Mastracci <matt@aclaro.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] kqemu benchmarks versus VMWare 5.0
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 19:10:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cv0u2q$6us$1@sea.gmane.org> (raw)
I ran QEMU+kqemu against VMWare 5.0 using the SiSoft Sandra benchmark
and got some surprising numbers. I don't know if the VMWare 5.0 beta's
debugging is getting in the way of its emulation numbers, but it seems
like QEMU is ahead of the pack here in terms of raw instruction
throughput (higher is better):
VMWare:
Integer: 13725 it/s
Floating Point: 14580 it/s
QEMU+kqemu:
Integer: 14991 it/s
Floating Point: 15949 it/s
Note that VMWare feels much smoother - most likely due to its more
advanced video and mouse drivers.
Congrats!
Matt.
next reply other threads:[~2005-02-17 2:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-17 2:10 Matthew Mastracci [this message]
2005-02-17 16:06 ` [Qemu-devel] kqemu benchmarks versus VMWare 5.0 Thomas Glanzmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='cv0u2q$6us$1@sea.gmane.org' \
--to=matt@aclaro.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).