From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7773C4361B for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 11:16:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 785CA229C6 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 11:16:49 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 785CA229C6 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=oracle.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:54944 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kolqS-0004lT-9r for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 06:16:48 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54290) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kolpE-0004HA-Vw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 06:15:33 -0500 Received: from aserp2130.oracle.com ([141.146.126.79]:48974) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kolpB-0008CD-7b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 06:15:31 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0BEBDnji186239; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 11:15:24 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=a4ZfLBNrCAXAR0mj3pjI7v7biXs2wzXkONLxove+nBg=; b=ndXt0HR5Cbu624Oi1ClkppX4CCyxuc7gkDf/PGZ0UhiPE66rJCePAIwCW0CN9lkAJeGC ALmn1vPtbnba4BmFJg1DK9w8VyhMgMT59PNjUf1iXKW8alokzgbunqhUA8iJvEefEQFz fcRFZNxFhkP88iuYXmP6d7V9uq090ZTP4Ff7gLwRoJTU7caAGBjNAg18SxzXJ/w2fNGv 3ePdGDwVeoAv23ADwtNQeiqSkcsPwLnP7Cl3P9PIZlqPY/oLgR1ISRMfSA8eJG2HYDl3 kN0izpQsKDmC/h+rg+pxXFSFSeM2Kpg7amul9lMV6NE06MF6i5cJvqNuHn30SHzLshex TA== Received: from userp3020.oracle.com (userp3020.oracle.com [156.151.31.79]) by aserp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 35ckcb4spp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 14 Dec 2020 11:15:24 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (userp3020.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp3020.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0BEBBH7N082216; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 11:15:23 GMT Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by userp3020.oracle.com with ESMTP id 35e6jp8xqr-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 14 Dec 2020 11:15:23 +0000 Received: from abhmp0003.oracle.com (abhmp0003.oracle.com [141.146.116.9]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 0BEBFM2m011631; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 11:15:22 GMT Received: from [10.175.19.81] (/10.175.19.81) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 03:15:22 -0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for pvpanic pci device To: Peter Maydell References: <1603891979-11961-1-git-send-email-mihai.carabas@oracle.com> From: Mihai Carabas Message-ID: Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 13:15:20 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: ro Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9834 signatures=668683 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2012140079 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9834 signatures=668683 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1011 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2012140079 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=141.146.126.79; envelope-from=mihai.carabas@oracle.com; helo=aserp2130.oracle.com X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: QEMU Developers Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" La 14.12.2020 13:03, Peter Maydell a scris: > On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 at 14:17, Mihai Carabas wrote: >> >> This patchset adds support for pvpanic pci device. The patchset was assembled >> from chuncks from some old patches [1] from 2018 which were left unmerged and >> some additions from me. >> >> How to test this: >> /usr/bin/qemu-system-aarch64 \ >> -machine virt,gic-version=3 -device pvpanic-pci >> >> After that you need to run a Linux kernel as guest, but you have to also apply >> the patches I will send for adding pci support for the pvpanic driver. > > Hi; I've reviewed most of the patches. I'm in principle in favour > of this, but the structuring of how the ISA and PCI versions of > the device are configured and built needs a little work. You > also need to sort out allocation of a PCI ID for it. Thank you for your feedback. I will apply it in the next days and send a new revision. Thank you, Mihai > > thanks > -- PMM >