From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49919) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1evPiu-0007oB-QJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 11:52:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1evPiF-00072F-TG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 11:50:52 -0400 References: <20180205202232.19254-1-mreitz@redhat.com> <73838a0c-d960-d24d-b706-a0ecbcbe7aaf@redhat.com> <20180307100424.GA7917@localhost.localdomain> <2d97780c-4a06-1b08-8211-760fc3567c2a@redhat.com> <20180308021241.GM13844@lemon.usersys.redhat.com> From: John Snow Message-ID: Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 11:47:58 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180308021241.GM13844@lemon.usersys.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH 0/2] block/ssh: Implement .bdrv_refresh_filename() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Fam Zheng Cc: Kevin Wolf , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Richard W . M . Jones" , qemu-block@nongnu.org, Max Reitz On 03/07/2018 09:12 PM, Fam Zheng wrote: > On Wed, 03/07 12:50, John Snow wrote: >> It's something I'd like to see patchew do, actually: >> >> "Here's a list of what's on the list that has no reviews or NACKs, and >> needs some love" > > It's not hard to define a search condition for that: > > http://patchew.org/search-help > > http://patchew.org/search?q=project%3AQEMU+age%3A%3E1m+not%3Areviewed+not%3Areplied+not%3Amerged+is%3Atested+to%3Aqemu-block > >> >> coupled with a 30 day "Hey, nobody looked at this" ping to the list >> before it NACKs a set for being too old. > > If the initial landing of the patch didn't get enough attention, chances are the > pings will not change much about it especially it's from a bot. > > A summary list sounds good, though. > > Fam > It's not really to *get* the patch attention as much as it's meant to inform the sender that it's not under consideration anymore. "Yeah, but everyone knows this...?" Consider it a formalization of the process. --js