Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] acpi: add aml_land() and aml_break() primitives

[Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>]

On 08/18/20 14:22, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> ---
>  include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h |  2 ++
>  hw/acpi/aml-build.c         | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h b/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h
> index d27da03d64..e213fc554c 100644
> --- a/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h
> +++ b/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h
> @@ -291,6 +291,7 @@ Aml *aml_store(Aml *val, Aml *target);
>  Aml *aml_and(Aml *arg1, Aml *arg2, Aml *dst);
>  Aml *aml_or(Aml *arg1, Aml *arg2, Aml *dst);
>  Aml *aml_lor(Aml *arg1, Aml *arg2);
> +Aml *aml_land(Aml *arg1, Aml *arg2);
>  Aml *aml_shiftleft(Aml *arg1, Aml *count);
>  Aml *aml_shiftright(Aml *arg1, Aml *count, Aml *dst);
>  Aml *aml_lless(Aml *arg1, Aml *arg2);
> @@ -300,6 +301,7 @@ Aml *aml_increment(Aml *arg);
>  Aml *aml_decrement(Aml *arg);
>  Aml *aml_index(Aml *arg1, Aml *idx);
>  Aml *aml_notify(Aml *arg1, Aml *arg2);
> +Aml *aml_break(void);
>  Aml *aml_call0(const char *method);
>  Aml *aml_call1(const char *method, Aml *arg1);
>  Aml *aml_call2(const char *method, Aml *arg1, Aml *arg2);
> diff --git a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> index f6fbc9b95d..14b41b56f0 100644
> --- a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> +++ b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> @@ -556,6 +556,15 @@ Aml *aml_or(Aml *arg1, Aml *arg2, Aml *dst)
>      return build_opcode_2arg_dst(0x7D /* OrOp */, arg1, arg2, dst);
>  }
>  
> +/* ACPI 1.0b: 16.2.5.4 Type 2 Opcodes Encoding: DefLAnd */
> +Aml *aml_land(Aml *arg1, Aml *arg2)
> +{
> +    Aml *var = aml_opcode(0x90 /* LandOp */);

(1) Small typo in the comment: in the spec, it is spelled "LAndOp", not
"LandOp" (consistently with "LOrOp" just below -- although "LOrOp" is
not visible in the context, in this email).

> +    aml_append(var, arg1);
> +    aml_append(var, arg2);
> +    return var;
> +}
> +
>  /* ACPI 1.0b: 16.2.5.4 Type 2 Opcodes Encoding: DefLOr */
>  Aml *aml_lor(Aml *arg1, Aml *arg2)
>  {

(2) In the header file, the declaration order is aml_lor(), then
aml_land(). But in the C file, the definitions are in the opposite
order: aml_land(), aml_lor().

Not sure which one is right, but we should be consistent, if we can.

> @@ -629,6 +638,13 @@ Aml *aml_notify(Aml *arg1, Aml *arg2)
>      return var;
>  }
>  
> +/* ACPI 1.0b: 16.2.5.3 Type 1 Opcodes Encoding: DefBreak */
> +Aml *aml_break(void)
> +{
> +    Aml *var = aml_opcode(0xa5 /* BreakOp */);
> +    return var;
> +}
> +
>  /* helper to call method without argument */
>  Aml *aml_call0(const char *method)
>  {
> 

With my trivial comments (1) and (2) fixed:

Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>

Thanks,
Laszlo