From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36222) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fifJI-0000tk-JH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2018 08:24:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fifJF-0002mv-JI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2018 08:24:00 -0400 References: <1532496652-26364-1-git-send-email-hongbo.zhang@linaro.org> <1532496652-26364-2-git-send-email-hongbo.zhang@linaro.org> <20180725095426.f7kv4ftngeje6pkx@kamzik.brq.redhat.com> <20180725114404.6g335n3rfjt23hjc@kamzik.brq.redhat.com> <20180726104636.aua3pjsqkqnkvggk@kamzik.brq.redhat.com> <20180726111354.flyqh2yo4xm5z6m7@kamzik.brq.redhat.com> From: Laszlo Ersek Message-ID: Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 14:23:46 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180726111354.flyqh2yo4xm5z6m7@kamzik.brq.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] hw/arm: Add Arm Enterprise machine type List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Andrew Jones , Ard Biesheuvel Cc: Peter Maydell , Radoslaw Biernacki , Hongbo Zhang , QEMU Developers , Leif Lindholm , qemu-arm , =?UTF-8?Q?Alex_Benn=c3=a9e?= On 07/26/18 13:13, Andrew Jones wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 12:56:22PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> On 26 July 2018 at 12:52, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> On 26 July 2018 at 11:46, Andrew Jones wrote: >>>> i440fx and q35 are specific machine types. 'sbsa' is a generic machine >>>> type that conforms to the SBSA specification. If you weren't trying to >>>> memory map AHCI and EHCI controllers, or if memory mapped AHCI and EHCI >>>> controllers were mandated in the SBSA spec, then there wouldn't be >>>> anything to discuss. But that's not the case. You're attempting to >>>> hard code one instance of a generic class of SBSA machines, but then >>>> just call it 'sbsa'. >>> >>> Modelling a 'generic SBSA machine' is not the goal here (I'm >>> not sure that's even possible or useful), so let's just >>> stipulate that we'll call the machine type something else >>> and move on ? >>> >> >> Fine with me. Care to suggest a name? :-) >> > > Also fine by me, but I'm not going to suggest the name. I fear the > backlash I'd receive after this mail thread! > I suggest "showcase2018". (Dead serious.) Laszlo