From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
To: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Wainer dos Santos Moschetta <wainersm@redhat.com>,
Beraldo Leal <bleal@redhat.com>,
Willian Rampazzo <wrampazz@redhat.com>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] scripts/ci/gitlab-pipeline-status: improve message regarding timeout
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 18:53:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d232b6d8-3302-ecea-7136-340c01d87c8c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200904164258.240278-3-crosa@redhat.com>
On 9/4/20 6:42 PM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> The script has its own timeout, which is about how long the script
> will wait (when called with --wait) for the pipeline to complete, and
> not necessarily for the pipeline to complete.
>
> Hopefully this will new wording will be clearer.
too many wills?
>
> Signed-off-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
> ---
> scripts/ci/gitlab-pipeline-status | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/ci/gitlab-pipeline-status b/scripts/ci/gitlab-pipeline-status
> index 194dd4d0bb..2a36f74696 100755
> --- a/scripts/ci/gitlab-pipeline-status
> +++ b/scripts/ci/gitlab-pipeline-status
> @@ -69,7 +69,10 @@ def wait_on_pipeline_success(timeout, interval,
> start = time.time()
> while True:
> if time.time() >= (start + timeout):
> - print("Waiting on the pipeline timed out")
> + msg = ("Timeout (-t/--timeout) of %i seconds reached, "
> + "won't wait any longer for the pipeline to complete")
> + msg %= timeout
> + print(msg)
Isn't it more pythonic / cheaper to declare the msg format out
of the loop and call directly:
print(msg % timeout)
?
> return False
>
> status = get_pipeline_status(project_id, commit_sha)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-04 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-04 16:42 [PATCH 0/7] gitlab pipeline check/watch script improvements Cleber Rosa
2020-09-04 16:42 ` [PATCH 1/7] scripts/ci/gitlab-pipeline-status: make branch name configurable Cleber Rosa
2020-09-04 17:01 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-09-04 16:42 ` [PATCH 2/7] scripts/ci/gitlab-pipeline-status: improve message regarding timeout Cleber Rosa
2020-09-04 16:53 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2020-09-04 16:42 ` [PATCH 3/7] scripts/ci/gitlab-pipeline-status: give early feedback on running pipelines Cleber Rosa
2020-09-04 16:59 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-09-04 16:42 ` [PATCH 4/7] scripts/ci/gitlab-pipeline-status: refactor parser creation Cleber Rosa
2020-09-04 16:42 ` [PATCH 5/7] scripts/ci/gitlab-pipeline-status: handle keyboard interrupts Cleber Rosa
2020-09-04 16:42 ` [PATCH 6/7] scripts/ci/gitlab-pipeline-status: use more descriptive exceptions Cleber Rosa
2020-09-04 16:42 ` [PATCH 7/7] scripts/ci/gitlab-pipeline-status: wait for pipeline creation Cleber Rosa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d232b6d8-3302-ecea-7136-340c01d87c8c@redhat.com \
--to=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=bleal@redhat.com \
--cc=crosa@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=wainersm@redhat.com \
--cc=wrampazz@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).