From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57030) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gfVbl-0002H8-Ln for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2019 14:58:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gfVbh-0001Lv-N4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2019 14:58:17 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44648) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gfVbh-0001Ld-Fe for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2019 14:58:13 -0500 References: <20181227063419.12981-1-yang.zhong@intel.com> <20181227063419.12981-24-yang.zhong@intel.com> From: Thomas Huth Message-ID: Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 20:58:09 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181227063419.12981-24-yang.zhong@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 23/25] x86_64-softmmu.mak: remove i386-softmmu.mak include List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Yang Zhong , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, sameo@linux.intel.com, ehabkost@redhat.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org On 2018-12-27 07:34, Yang Zhong wrote: > Only keep same boards definitions as i386-softmmu.mak in > x86_64-softmmu.mak. > > Signed-off-by: Yang Zhong > --- > default-configs/x86_64-softmmu.mak | 6 +++++- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/default-configs/x86_64-softmmu.mak b/default-configs/x86_64-softmmu.mak > index 64b2ee2960..0c69c2930c 100644 > --- a/default-configs/x86_64-softmmu.mak > +++ b/default-configs/x86_64-softmmu.mak > @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ > # Default configuration for x86_64-softmmu > > -include i386-softmmu.mak > +# Boards: > +# > +CONFIG_ISAPC=y > +CONFIG_I440FX=y > +CONFIG_Q35=y Not sure whether this patch is really necessary since the two configs are currently really the same. Anyway, in case you want to keep the patch: Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth