From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Bruce Rogers <brogers@suse.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: borntraeger@de.ibm.com, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
"rth@twiddle.net" <rth@twiddle.net>, Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: Exclude more cpu model code when building s390x linux-user
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 21:03:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d3700c72-7030-4326-d1c1-7fdfa279b578@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58B81727020000480014092F@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
Am 02.03.2017 um 20:59 schrieb Bruce Rogers:
>>>> On 3/2/2017 at 12:53 PM, <david@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Am 02.03.2017 um 20:50 schrieb David Hildenbrand:
>>> Am 02.03.2017 um 20:33 schrieb Bruce Rogers:
>>>> Currently qemu-s390x segfaults. Avoid cpu model code which doesn't
>>>> apply in linux user case.
>>>
>>> That was also my impression, but it does apply. However, for now it
>>> doesn't matter, as also tcg isn't properly wired up.
>>>
>>> In general, linux-user can support _at least_ the same features as tcg,
>>> in theory even more (all that only apply to kernel space).
>>>
>>> We had a proper fix on this list by Richard Henderson, wonder what
>>> happened to that?
>>
>> Actually it was Stefan Weil :) cc-ing him.
>
> I'm not all so familiar with this code, I only saw a failure and fixed it the
> most obvious way for me. I'm happy if there is a better fix out there.
Thanks for taking care, seems like the other patch somehow got stuck, so
thanks for bringing that up! :)
In my original series (when I thought linux-user wouldn't care about CPU
models), your patch would have been the correct fix!
>
> BTW: I resent the patch again with SOB.
>
> Brue
>
--
Thanks,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-02 20:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-02 19:33 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: Exclude more cpu model code when building s390x linux-user Bruce Rogers
2017-03-02 19:50 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-03-02 19:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-03-02 19:59 ` Bruce Rogers
2017-03-02 20:03 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-03-02 19:51 Bruce Rogers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d3700c72-7030-4326-d1c1-7fdfa279b578@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=brogers@suse.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=sw@weilnetz.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).