From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5990DC43461 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 04:35:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18790206CA for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 04:35:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="EluCZBcy" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 18790206CA Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:57506 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kE3S8-0006uW-8m for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 00:35:56 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34614) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kE3RG-00068F-EN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 00:35:02 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:47343 helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kE3RC-00021g-Ci for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 00:35:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1599194097; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=4tX42JeuT11tVwYg7ef2XUqO8sjNN+gdBUPZysbX08E=; b=EluCZBcyCpq81RrBHJ0esz6MM1VjAUwFOYBDfKuyigVdvNeGaoGfib+o3Q6SO07Nmss242 siW7WEn+t/4aizYbndOvvQIeI6qAIOZVhceI+ndC4o669a/wdbPPHu1nb3V2Vvd4tCHEpD p5sv+IqpveR8JXQwoNkZZ8/Atjp1ahk= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-401-E-lusR5jPTSbN6k5sU1Lgg-1; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 00:34:55 -0400 X-MC-Unique: E-lusR5jPTSbN6k5sU1Lgg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31A5818B9F84; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 04:34:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.72.13.157] (ovpn-13-157.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.13.157]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8F6B1002D57; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 04:34:34 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] memory: Skip bad range assertion if notifier is DEVIOTLB_UNMAP type To: =?UTF-8?Q?Eugenio_P=c3=a9rez?= , Peter Xu , qemu-devel@nongnu.org References: <20200625191651.5817-1-eperezma@redhat.com> <20200903161446.29615-1-eperezma@redhat.com> <20200903161446.29615-6-eperezma@redhat.com> From: Jason Wang Message-ID: Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 12:34:33 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200903161446.29615-6-eperezma@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=jasowang@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0.002 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=207.211.31.120; envelope-from=jasowang@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/03 22:51:37 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -44 X-Spam_score: -4.5 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-2.403, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , Aleksandar Rikalo , Yan Zhao , Eduardo Habkost , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Juan Quintela , =?UTF-8?Q?Herv=c3=a9_Poussineau?= , Eric Auger , qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Avi Kivity , Paolo Bonzini , David Gibson , Richard Henderson Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 2020/9/4 上午12:14, Eugenio Pérez wrote: > Device IOTLB invalidations can unmap arbitrary ranges, eiter outside of > the memory region or even [0, ~0ULL] for all the space. The assertion > could be hit by a guest, and rhel7 guest effectively hit it. > > Signed-off-by: Eugenio Pérez > Reviewed-by: Peter Xu > Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela > --- > softmmu/memory.c | 13 +++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/softmmu/memory.c b/softmmu/memory.c > index 8694fc7cf7..e723fcbaa1 100644 > --- a/softmmu/memory.c > +++ b/softmmu/memory.c > @@ -1895,6 +1895,7 @@ void memory_region_notify_iommu_one(IOMMUNotifier *notifier, > { > IOMMUTLBEntry *entry = &event->entry; > hwaddr entry_end = entry->iova + entry->addr_mask; > + IOMMUTLBEntry tmp = *entry; > > if (event->type == IOMMU_NOTIFIER_UNMAP) { > assert(entry->perm == IOMMU_NONE); > @@ -1908,10 +1909,18 @@ void memory_region_notify_iommu_one(IOMMUNotifier *notifier, > return; > } > > - assert(entry->iova >= notifier->start && entry_end <= notifier->end); > + if (notifier->notifier_flags & IOMMU_NOTIFIER_DEVIOTLB_UNMAP) { > + /* Crop (iova, addr_mask) to range */ > + tmp.iova = MAX(tmp.iova, notifier->start); > + tmp.addr_mask = MIN(entry_end, notifier->end) - tmp.iova; > + /* Confirm no underflow */ > + assert(MIN(entry_end, notifier->end) >= tmp.iova); It's still not clear to me why we need such assert. Consider notifier->end is the possible IOVA range but not possible device IOTLB invalidation range (e.g it allows [0, ULLONG_MAX]). Thanks > + } else { > + assert(entry->iova >= notifier->start && entry_end <= notifier->end); > + } > > if (event->type & notifier->notifier_flags) { > - notifier->notify(notifier, entry); > + notifier->notify(notifier, &tmp); > } > } >