From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HMQCi-0004OP-79 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 09:54:52 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HMQCg-0004Nf-Rx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 09:54:51 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HMQCg-0004Nc-Ng for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 09:54:50 -0500 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.185]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HMQCg-00021B-8Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 09:54:50 -0500 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c31so996097nfb for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 06:54:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 09:54:44 -0500 From: Peter Sender: pjcreath@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] sparc32 bug/misfeature In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 2/27/07, Blue Swirl wrote: > In Linux the IDs are listed in include/asm-sparc/machines.h, there are much > more than just these two. There are much more than those two in the original file as well. These are the only two supported by SunOS 4.x (sun4m). So should this be added to qemu as a "new machine" or should the existing sparc target simply be made more configurable?