qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, thuth@redhat.com,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
	Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/3] s390x/tcg: LAP support using immediate TLB invalidation
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 14:09:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d40ebe4f-5306-4810-db72-b148c1b2adcf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170929134938.18fae231.cohuck@redhat.com>

On 29.09.2017 13:49, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 19:00:24 +0200
> David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> Details about Low-Address Protection can be found in description of
>> patch 1 and 2. It is basically a subpage protection of the first two
>> pages of every address space (for which it is enabled).
>>
>> We can achieve this by simply directly invalidating the TLB entry and
>> therefore forcing every write accesses onto these two pages into the slow
>> path.
>>
>> With this patch, I can boot Linux just fine (which uses LAP). This also
>> makes all related kvm-unit-tests that we have pass.
>>
>> The checks are working that good, that I discovered a STFL bug. STFL
>> stores into the low addresses but low-address protection does explicitly
>> not apply. The Linux kernel calls STFL while LAP is active. So without
>> patch nr 3, booting Linux will fail. (this change is also part of a patch
>> of my SMP series).
> 
> I fear I have lost track a bit with all those patches floating around.
> IIUC, patch 3 fixes a real bug that is only exposed by your LAP
> changes. It used to be part of the stfl changes in v1 of your smp
> series but is no longer in v2. So, is this a patch that can be applied
> to current s390-next?
> 

The SMP series is based on both, this series and the CPU cleanup series
you already picked up.

You can apply Patch 3 with the following modified description (requested
by Thomas):


s390x/tcg: make STFL store into the lowcore

Using virtual memory access is wrong and will soon include low-address
protection checks, which is to be bypassed for STFL.

STFL is a privileged instruction and using LowCore requires
!CONFIG_USER_ONLY, so add the ifdef and move the declaration to the
right place.

This was originally part of a bigger STFL(E) refactoring.

Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>


The other two patches, I will resend once we know how to handle the TLB
invalidation.

>>
>> Based on: https://github.com/cohuck/qemu.git s390-next
>> Available on: https://github.com/dhildenb/qemu.git s390x_lap
>>
>>
>> David Hildenbrand (3):
>>   accel/tcg: allow to invalidate a write TLB entry immediately
>>   s390x/tcg: low-address protection support
>>   s390x/tcg: make STFL store into the lowcore
>>
>>  accel/tcg/cputlb.c           |  5 ++-
>>  accel/tcg/softmmu_template.h |  4 +-
>>  include/exec/cpu-all.h       |  3 ++
>>  target/s390x/excp_helper.c   |  3 +-
>>  target/s390x/helper.h        |  2 +-
>>  target/s390x/mem_helper.c    |  8 ----
>>  target/s390x/misc_helper.c   |  7 +++-
>>  target/s390x/mmu_helper.c    | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>>  8 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
>>
> 


-- 

Thanks,

David

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-29 12:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-27 17:00 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/3] s390x/tcg: LAP support using immediate TLB invalidation David Hildenbrand
2017-09-27 17:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/3] accel/tcg: allow to invalidate a write TLB entry immediately David Hildenbrand
2017-09-27 17:48   ` Richard Henderson
2017-09-27 18:50     ` David Hildenbrand
2017-10-16  7:24     ` David Hildenbrand
2017-10-16 18:06       ` Richard Henderson
2017-09-27 17:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 2/3] s390x/tcg: low-address protection support David Hildenbrand
2017-09-27 17:51   ` Richard Henderson
2017-09-28  4:50   ` Thomas Huth
2017-09-28 13:08     ` David Hildenbrand
2017-09-29 11:27       ` Cornelia Huck
2017-10-12  8:41         ` Thomas Huth
2017-10-16  7:20           ` David Hildenbrand
2017-09-27 17:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 3/3] s390x/tcg: make STFL store into the lowcore David Hildenbrand
2017-09-27 17:52   ` Richard Henderson
2017-09-27 18:46     ` David Hildenbrand
2017-09-28  4:23       ` Thomas Huth
2017-09-29 12:43   ` Cornelia Huck
2017-09-29 11:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/3] s390x/tcg: LAP support using immediate TLB invalidation Cornelia Huck
2017-09-29 12:09   ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2017-09-29 12:13     ` Cornelia Huck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d40ebe4f-5306-4810-db72-b148c1b2adcf@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).