From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52778) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dmAgo-0000OR-Tv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 27 Aug 2017 23:26:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dmAgl-0004We-P7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 27 Aug 2017 23:26:14 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:41729 helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dmAgl-0004WE-JR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 27 Aug 2017 23:26:11 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v7S3Np2j098552 for ; Sun, 27 Aug 2017 23:26:10 -0400 Received: from e11.ny.us.ibm.com (e11.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.201]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2ckphmmyd4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 27 Aug 2017 23:26:10 -0400 Received: from localhost by e11.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Sun, 27 Aug 2017 23:26:09 -0400 References: <20170823072656.3352-1-zyimin@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <871ef0e3-ea8b-df59-0eeb-8019b350f1d2@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170824091332.01ff3698.cohuck@redhat.com> <26519e3e-3ef4-7b18-6d80-27941ee36df9@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20d23300-2f98-7b38-afab-4c8971afb356@redhat.com> From: Yi Min Zhao Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 11:26:07 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20d23300-2f98-7b38-afab-4c8971afb356@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] four zpci patches List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake , Cornelia Huck Cc: pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, agraf@suse.de, borntraeger@de.ibm.com =E5=9C=A8 2017/8/25 =E4=B8=8A=E5=8D=8812:27, Eric Blake =E5=86=99=E9=81=93= : > On 08/24/2017 03:48 AM, Yi Min Zhao wrote: >> >> =E5=9C=A8 2017/8/24 =E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=883:13, Cornelia Huck =E5=86=99=E9= =81=93: >>> On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 13:20:12 +0800 >>> Yi Min Zhao wrote: >>> >>>> Why can't I receive [Qemu-devel] prefixed patches? >> I sent patches to qemu-devel@nongnu.org and cc you also myself. >> But what I received looks like CC ones, no [Qemu-devel] prefix. > You can tell mailman whether you want to receive copies of mails throug= h > the list even when you are listed in cc (defaults to on, but some peopl= e > like myself set it off to reduce mail); if you switch that option in > your subscription settings, then you will not see the [Qemu-devel] > prefix on any mail where you were cc'd. [side note: turning off copies > of mail where you are cc'd triggers what I consider to be a mailman bug= : > it actively rewrites the to/cc of the email to omit your address in the > copy it sends to the list, which means people who follow up to the list > no longer cc you, and do not know that you were cc'd in the first place= ] I didn't tell mailman anything. So I think the receiving copies setting=20 is turned on. What I can receive is only from cc. But as what Conny said, it seems=20 that other external reviewers in cc list didn't receive any mail unless I replied a mail. > Furthermore, there may be other places along the way that do data > de-duplication. For example, anyone subscribing via a gmail.com addres= s > gets at most one copy of a message based on the message-id; if they are > subscribed to the mailing list and also get a cc of a given message, > only one of those copies will show up (because google suppressed the > second copy with the same message-id, even though the subject lines are > different); the one copy is often (but not always) the one without the > [Qemu-devel] prefix because cc'd mail goes through less processing and > thus tends to arrive sooner than the copy sent through mailman. [side > note: google calls de-duplication a feature, but you can't turn it off, > and it's one of the reasons that I don't use google for my personal ema= il] >